luvthe9
Veteran
- Aug 30, 2002
- 9,464
- 14,119
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As others have said I feel US should compensate them for their expenses & nothing else.
i am not sure which correspondence, quasi-un-accredited law school you are going to...but, can you spare all of us your "legal" opinion on matters? "a lot" of people really believe that you are a professional. LOL!!From a legal perspective...
First I would ask if NY Waterways had business interruption insurance.
Second I would see if the accident could (or should) be considered an Act of God. How could US Airways have known that a flock of birds would intercept their plane at 3,000'. US Airways has no independent radar and they are not required to have it. The radar is from the FAA, whose employees cleared Flt. 1549 for departure. If anyone would or could have that information, it would be the FAA.
If Flt. 1549 had crash landed in the Hudson due to mechanical issues or pilot error then I would fully agree that US Airways is liable for consequential damages to third parties. However, I don't see that here.
The person is a professional, they left the airlines to go work in the legal field.
Foot taste well?
I think all hp-fa was doing is laying out the legal case that US might have in defending against a lawsuit. What the morally right thing for US to do is a different subject.i am not sure which correspondence...
I am still around, just been real busy, I still watch the boards.700UW!!!! Where have you been?