TWU informer
Veteran
- Nov 4, 2003
- 7,550
- 3,731
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is because he is aware of management rights clauses. It doesn't matter it be AMFA or the Teamsters the company would introduce the CBA they have with their employees and point out Article 28b to the new union on the property and say we intend to impose all terms of this agreement that don't conflict with other articles of the agreement and the new union would have to take it on the chin since they would have no past practice arguments to make to slow the company from imposing their will. With the TWU we have room to argue the issues and with a new union we would really be screwed in my opinion...
That is because he is aware of management rights clauses. It doesn't matter it be AMFA or the Teamsters the company would introduce the CBA they have with their employees and point out Article 28b to the new union on the property and say we intend to impose all terms of this agreement that don't conflict with other articles of the agreement and the new union would have to take it on the chin since they would have no past practice arguments to make to slow the company from imposing their will. With the TWU we have room to argue the issues and with a new union we would really be screwed in my opinion...
That is because he is aware of management rights clauses. It doesn't matter it be AMFA or the Teamsters the company would introduce the CBA they have with their employees and point out Article 28b to the new union on the property and say we intend to impose all terms of this agreement that don't conflict with other articles of the agreement and the new union would have to take it on the chin since they would have no past practice arguments to make to slow the company from imposing their will. With the TWU we have room to argue the issues and with a new union we would really be screwed in my opinion...I see a new union as un-effective and a false promise Informer <_<
Just curious , what would happen to all the past practice? As far as new terms, if we agreed to the new terms then past practice becomes irrelevant. Are you saying that we can keep our Wallen report because we've had it the last 50 years because of past practice?
Sorry you guys don't like the way I think but changing to any new union would only empower the company in my opinion...
Just now watched the Seham video and it looks like I'm right on point with my argument here as he pointed out in his video AMFA would get their goose cooked too at AA... B)
Thanks for the video Informer
Sorry you guys don't like the way I think but changing to any new union would only empower the company in my opinion...
Sorry you guys don't like the way I think but changing to any new union would only empower the company in my opinion...
The only time I have seen the TWU really fight was when we had the petition to revote in 2003 when the pension fund for exectutives was released the day after the vote passed. The TWU, who had to have knowlege of this but kept it from us, went to a federal judge to stop us. To my knowlege they have never gone to a judge to try to stop AA from anything. But Jim Little got a federal judge to say that he doesn't even have to let us vote. That alone calls for action on our part. A new union will be a challenge, but we have all kinds of examples on what not to do by looking at the TWU.