Hey Luvn- the Phila metro region, METRO REGION, PHL, Trenton, Wilmington De. and all the suburbs dwarfs PHX. Yes, maybe the city limits of PHX hold more than PHL.The overall population draw is much greater. Next time you get that long final in PHL, check it out.I wonder why SWA keeps coming on here? Even Parker gets it.
Actually according to the US Office of Management and Budget. The PHL metro area ranks #5 in the U.S. with an overall total population of 5.9 million. PHX ranks #12 with a total population of 4.3 million, and is hardly "dwarfed" by PHL.
However, major differences included the PHL metro area (aka Delaware Valley metro area)is overlapping with adjacent communities and it population numbers might be slightly inflated, where PHX only counts the Valley of the Sun. It would be like counting Tuscon, Yuma and Flagstaff in the PHX population, (which by the way when added to PHX just about exactly equals PHL). Also, PHL has one of the highest poverty rates in the country ranked #10 as opposed to PHX ranked #30, so the number of potential passengers is very similar.
But the original theme to the thread is who would wants a PHX hub. The answere is USAirways LCC. We want both a PHX (#12) and a PHL(#5) hub. Ask yourself this, why would anyone want a SFO (#13), SEA(#15),SLC(#49),MSP(#16), hub. The answere is only partially because of their respective population, but much more importantly how the logistics of getting the passenger from their house in Lancaster, PA to disneyland or the bussiness meeting/convention in the most convienent route for them and the most efficient use of equiptment for the airline is accomplished.
So in the fragmentation scenarios everybody is throwing around, both PHX and PHL are viable, but it is awfully crowded near PHL by JFK,EWR,IAD,BWI and PHX is sort of close to LAX.