chris perry
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 544
- Reaction score
- 118
The only reason the 737's are going to the west coast is they are pissed off at the DFW b check crew.Plain and simple...
Never mind. I got caught up in the thread hijack.I have no doubt that a DFW crew would manage to piss someone off, but I doubt that's the real reason. Finance tends to turn a blind eye to the emotional crap. It's all about where the airplanes are.
UA already has announced they're eliminating F on their p.s. service, thanks to a major change in the SGA's contract. I'd be shocked if AA didn't follow suit.
Or not, since AA doesn't always act as quick as they should...
But either way, the 762's days are numbered, and there's more and more 738 flying on the west coast.
I agree with you that Bob Owens is not lying about the current shortage of stateside AMTs. I disagree with Bob when he writes that higher pay for line mechanics would have no difference in the enrollment rates at the schools. In my view, if AA's line mechanics could achieve $45 to $50/hr, more young people would be encouraged to enroll, especially if UA and DL were forced to pay those wages to line mechanics. Inevitably, enrollment numbers would exceed demand, and the lower-paying MROs would find plenty willing to settle for today's Tulsa wages (or less).
With nearly 7 billion people on the planet, there's no shortage of hands willing to work in airplane chop shops somewhere in the third world. That's why domestic overhaul will never be paid UPS or WN wages. Heavy checks don't sneak up on the airline the way overnight problems do, so the location of the work can be controlled (unlike line maintenance). If only those airplanes weren't so darned mobile.
It's a B check, not really that much to moving it, especially when they used to do B checks there, all you need is a station that has a hangar and we have a couple of class II stations out there that have hangars and no B checks. Staffing it shouldn't be a problem, just recall some of the guys they lost a few months ago. W hen they pulled the 767 B check out of there.I agree with you E. No company is going to make a decision to move an entire check line to another station based on some malcontent(s) in one place. There are many other ways to deal with personnel issues.
TWU says they will fight it; well, ya'll know how that will go.
I have no doubt that a DFW crew would manage to piss someone off, but I doubt that's the real reason. Finance tends to turn a blind eye to the emotional crap. It's all about where the airplanes are.
UA already has announced they're eliminating F on their p.s. service, thanks to a major change in the SGA's contract. I'd be shocked if AA didn't follow suit.
Or not, since AA doesn't always act as quick as they should...
But either way, the 762's days are numbered, and there's more and more 738 flying on the west coast.
EXTRA HEADS ? YOUR KIDDING RIGHT ?Owe they tried to turn a blind eye to it but truth be told the average B check was taking 3 to 4 days and that has been going on for the better part of a year. so lets see what they want to do with the extra heads.
What does any of this have to do with corrosion on 757
I guess it's just easier to farm the work out. Have you Buck heard anything about moveing some of the work to MCI, there was a brief discussion with the local 514 president and the former 530 president who is still in Kansas City but later heard they are outsourceing them now .GO FIGURETULE is going to be the 737 base. But I do not see why the 757 could not be done at MCI. However as the Airbus arrives, there will be a one for one swap with the 757's.
You mean the guy who has now collected 1 years worth of salary from AA without ever showing up to work or relocate. Go Figurethe former 530 president who is still in Kansas City but later heard they are outsourceing them now .GO FIGURE
<_< ------ Hey! He's not scoring any points with us either Tex!You mean the guy who has now collected 1 years worth of salary from AA without ever showing up to work or relocate. Go Figure