if you got past the first line and into the data, you would see that AA increased int'l system capacity by 2.3% and its domestic system by 1%.
But the domestic system improved its LF while, once again, AA's LF IN EVERY int'l region DECLINED.
AA is simply trying to grow its int'l network at a time when the demand is not there while leaving its domestic system untouched.
Companies the size of AA should be better able to align their strategies with the market.
AA will very soon have to face the reality that it will end up being the #3 out of 3 US int'l carriers regardless of what it is in the domestic market.
AA didn't have a Pacific presence before the merger and its Atlantic system was eclipsed by DL and UA. The justification for the merger was that AA and US together could better compete with DL and UA. Yet since the merger AA has spent enormous money trying to grow its int'l route system where it was not strong.
AA's performance on the TATL system is all the more shocking considering the Air France strike.
The whole truth is that AA is and will be a lot smaller airline than a lot of you thought they would be if they have the slightest goal of being profitable on par with the best in the business.