Wow, I thought that was when the company made money.Good for them. Management bonuses were set by a compensation committee and should he fulfilled to them accordingly. Would the outraged employee posters be okay if AA management decided to evade your collective bargaining agreement? You can't have it both ways. Bonuses and stock awards are commonplace and necessary to attract and retain key talent.
Josh
Are you kidding me! retain and attract managers that are fiscally reckless, clueless, and just plain morons. Are these the managers your talking about? What a joke! I'm amazed that the pilots, f/a, and mechanics haven't shut this place down. But, I think it's coming!Good for them. Management bonuses were set by a compensation committee and should he fulfilled to them accordingly. Would the outraged employee posters be okay if AA management decided to evade your collective bargaining agreement? You can't have it both ways. Bonuses and stock awards are commonplace and necessary to attract and retain key talent.
Josh
There are three scenario's going on here with this comment by Josh.Good for them. Management bonuses were set by a compensation committee and should he fulfilled to them accordingly. Would the outraged employee posters be okay if AA management decided to evade your collective bargaining agreement? You can't have it both ways. Bonuses and stock awards are commonplace and necessary to attract and retain key talent.
Josh
Whenever I see your scene name, I dont even bother reading your posts. I scroll right down and pass your nonsense.Good for them. Management bonuses were set by a compensation committee and should he fulfilled to them accordingly. Would the outraged employee posters be okay if AA management decided to evade your collective bargaining agreement? You can't have it both ways. Bonuses and stock awards are commonplace and necessary to attract and retain key talent.
Josh
I agree, and what ever happened to the saying, "Lead by example." If I were one of these executives receiving these payouts, I truly would be ashamed.Sorry, there is no excuse for this program to continue to exist. It's feeding at the trough, and I've questioned it for seven years running. No other action by management, including the concessions, has caused more damage to management/labor relations.
I keep waiting for Arpey to show himself as a true leader, and publicly decline the awards. And I'm sure some of his direct reports would follow suit. But it has yet to happen.
Typically L6 and higher is included in the plan; L5's are the exception, and few & far between.
I'm not sure I really understand how this bonus system works. The way I read it is, every manager level 5 and higher gets paid, Right? Also, it reads that in May they will receive an additional bonus in deferred shares, Right? And if that's not enough, in July they get SAR's, not the airborne sickness, but more stock options, Right? Is this standard practice for a corporation to reward their executives, when all three labor groups agreed to concessions to avoid bankruptcy?Not again !!!
On April 20, 2011 these PSP shares will be awarded. Using a $10 share price, if a manager chooses to cash-in his or her shares, the following total bonus value will be realized by approximately 950 AA managers. These managers include AA Flight level 8 or higher managers and level 5 or higher managers outside of AA Flight.
PSP Bonus Value @$10 share price (vest April 20, 2011):
All participating managers..................................$14.3 million
Top 5 Officers..................................................$3.1 million
Arpey.............................................................$1.15 million
Horton...........................................................$540,000
Garton...........................................................$540,000
Reding...........................................................$540,000
Kennedy.........................................................$307,000
On May 20, 2011, management will also receive a deferred shares bonus award. This bonus is not affected by competitor rankings.
Deferred Share Bonus Value @$10 per share:
All participating managers...................................$9.5 million
Top 5 Officers...................................................$1.7 million
In July 2011, management will be awarded Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR), which are similar to options with varying strike prices.
SARs (Options) Value @$10 per share:
All participating managers..................................$11.3 million
Top 5 Officers..................................................$2.9 million
2011 Total Bonus Value @ $10 share price:
All participating managers..................................$35.1 million
Top 5 Officers..................................................$7.6 million
The 2011 management bonus total value (@$10 share price) of $35.1 million will be in addition to the $344 million awarded AA management during the period 2006-2010. As management bonus plans are granted three years in advance, the bonus share totals are known through vesting year 2013. Using a $10 share price assumption, the total value of AA manager bonuses for the period 2011-2013 could reach an additional $226 million.
Source: SEC Filings
I'm not sure I really understand how this bonus system works. The way I read it is, every manager level 5 and higher gets paid, Right? Also, it reads that in May they will receive an additional bonus in deferred shares, Right? And if that's not enough, in July they get SAR's, not the airborne sickness, but more stock options, Right? Is this standard practice for a corporation to reward their executives, when all three labor groups agreed to concessions to avoid bankruptcy?
Love it, hate it, call it a loophole or make up other names for it, but at the end of the day, I will call it IMMORAL, and a slap in the face, to the backbone of AA. Thanks for your insight, it means alot since your ex/management.First of all, I said earlier today that very few of the L5 managers are among the privileged, and those that are probably are not in the field locations (including the bases). I knew a lot of L5's at HDQ when I was still there, and none ever admitted to being in this particular program.
Second... is it standard practice to reward executives? Not really, but as has been pointed out ad nauseum, this is not a reward -- it is contractual variable compensation.
Love it, hate it, call it a loophole or make up other names for it, but at the end of the day, variable compensation is not a discretionary payment. It has a stated value to be paid provided certain conditions are met. Quite similar to commissions and other incentive payments which exist for commissioned salespeople. Hit the target, you get paid. GM continued to pay out incentives to their dealers for hitting sales targets while they were in bankruptcy, and their salesforce continued to earn commissions. The fact that they'd stiffed shareholders, creditors, and the banks didn't matter.
We've discussed this several years in a row. It pisses me off, too, but as much as I feel the triggering conditions should have been changed seven years ago to include financial benchmarks/thresholds, I don't sit on AMR's compensation committee, so they weren't changed.