What's new

Abortion: Which Side Is Fabricating?

Of course you wouldnt. However having children, changes your perspective and your life. But again you wouldn't know that.


I would rather my nieces not suffer hunger or disease due to over population. One would think that having children would make one inclined to prevent them suffering. I guess not. You seem to prefer the idea of nature dealing with it. No wonder the Titanic sunk.
 
I would rather my nieces not suffer hunger or disease due to over population. One would think that having children would make one inclined to prevent them suffering. I guess not. You seem to prefer the idea of nature dealing with it. No wonder the Titanic sunk.
You rather them not suffer? Are they to be included in that (final) solution of yours?
 
I guess you did not read my earlier post. Nothing I have said has anything to do with anyone who is already born. The only thing I am advocating is birth controls to limit population. Not sure why you are so infatuated with getting rid of people who are already alive.

I would rather see the human race deal with the issue prior to nature taking over.
 
The only thing I am advocating is birth controls to limit population. Not sure why you are so infatuated with getting rid of people who are already alive.
With birth controls would you not need to implement death controls? With limiting births and not increasing deaths you end up with nation of old people with not enough youths to keep it strong.
 
With birth controls would you not need to implement death controls? With limiting births and not increasing deaths you end up with nation of old people with not enough youths to keep it strong.


I believe I stated earlier I advocate replacement value. Each person has one kid. Pop would remain neutral. Might drop a bit I think that would be a good thing. Either way, no one needs to get wacked.
 
Sorry Garf but to speak about birth control issues whilst never participating in birthing or raising another human being is about as absurd as electing a president with no foreign policy experience.
 
Each person has one kid. Pop would remain neutral.

Think about it, it doesn't work that way. I have one kid to replace me then when can my replacement have a kid? When I am gone? What if I live to be a hundred?
 
Sorry Garf but to speak about birth control issues whilst never participating in birthing or raising another human being is about as absurd as electing a president with no foreign policy experience.
Which we have done over and over in the past 200 years.

Not sure what that has to do with the topic though. :unsure:
 
Which we have done over and over in the past 200 years.

Not sure what that has to do with the topic though. :unsure:

I believe Bill Clinton ate at the International House of Pancakes.....while governor.... 😛
 
Who is this "we" you speak of? Liberals? Yes I know...
We, as in the people of the United States of America.

Reagan and George W. Bush had zero foreign policy experience. I think they are considered conservatives...

Darn, you can see Mexico from Texas and California, so maybe they did have some. 😉
 
Back
Top