Freedom4all
Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2009
- Messages
- 767
- Reaction score
- 0
Despite what Obama said, the House bill would allow abortions to be covered by a federal plan and by federally subsidized private plans. Fact Check Source
I don't like this even a little and NOT for the reason you might think.
If you take out all of the moral implications an abortion is nothing more then elective surgery. Ergo if you cover abortions then logic would dictate that Boob Jobs should also be covered as that is elective surgery as well
Nothing more! Nothing Less.
If you don't believe in abortion - DON'T have one!
Do you pay premiums into a group medical health coverage plan?Using Taxpayers dollars to be used for abortions, there is no way I would support that ever. :down:
if someone wants to terminate the life of their unborn child, they can pay for that out of their own pocket.
Its one thing to have a choice in these terrible situations, its quite another to forward the bill to the taxpayer. :down:
"Forty-six percent of workers today in employer-based health insurance finance abortion. I think this is critical. Many of you know people who consider themselves very good, solid citizens [and] who consider themselves pro-life. They go to church on Sunday; but on Monday morning, they finance abortion. They don't know they finance abortion, they do not conscientiously do it -- but they do do it. And they do it through private health insurance. They do it because the plan covers it," Moffitt pointed out.
Moffitt also notes that 86 percent of employer-sponsored plans cover artificial contraception. He advocates three policies to restore patients' freedom of conscience: fixing the federal tax code to create fairness in health coverage; offering values-driven healthcare plans; and eliminating barriers to purchasing health plans across state lines. He believes there needs to be a national consumer-driven market for health insurance.
Not covered:
• Procedures, services, drugs, and supplies related to
abortions except when the life of the mother would
be endangered if the fetus were carried to term or
when the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or
incest
• Genetic testing of the baby’s father
that is probably true and it makes me more sick.. on top of the fact they want to send the bill to the taxpayer on top of it all!Do you pay premiums into a group medical health coverage plan?
Don't look now, but you may already be assisting in paying for them.
I am willing to bet that 90% of all people who have health coverage have never read more than the highlight sheet sent out every year...at least until they get a bill and find out that something was not covered, or out of network!that is probably true and it makes me more sick.. on top of the fact they want to send the bill to the taxpayer on top of it all!
its just sickening! :down:
I dont think that is true!I am willing to bet that 90% of all people who have health coverage have never read more than the highlight sheet sent out every year...at least until they get a bill and find out that something was not covered, or out of network!
Relax. That is not what I said.just because someone recognizes the importance of health coverage does not mean they skim over the part "we cover abortions too" !
I am thinking in general terms based on what I am reading not necessarily focused on your comments.That is not what I said.
And what I said was not about you.
Obviously if we are talking about it here, all of us are probably very familiar with what ourcoverage is. Maybe I do not give enough credit to the masses. Ninety percent may be a little high figure.
I can be very composed and find something sickening and...sad.Relax.
I am thinking in general terms based on what I am reading not necessarily focused on your comments.
and of course it wasn't about me!
but!
I think more than 90 percent of people do read more than the highlight fact sheet was sort of the point!
and they probably cover some abortions..
my personal opinion abortion procedures for the sake of not assuming any responsibility is simply irresponsible with their own bodies!
these people who go out and get "knocked up" and then a quick visit to the Doctor is the way to go and then right back out in the same scene again and its no big deal if it happens again is just terrible and it happens just like that all the time!
(yes there are procedures that are necessary for severe cases.. in some life saving situations for the mother, but most of them are done because they can) that is a problem!
I understand that, but the topic of this thread is Abortion. and you are correct, that is considered elective if it is performed excluding the life saving case of the mother.No matter what your beliefs on abortion, tax dollars should not be used for elective procedures.
Abortion coverage will never make it out of the Senate Committee version.I understand that, but the topic of this thread is Abortion. and you are correct, that is considered elective if it is performed excluding the life saving case of the mother.
(and if that is what they expect Tax payers to cover in that proposal, the "elective" ones?)
:down: