What's new

Aircraft Crashes in Texas

  • Thread starter Thread starter nuclearfission
  • Start date Start date
And you actually think there is no concerted effort to link this guy to the 'right wing extremists' from the left?

If they find he drove within two blocks of a tea party gig......all bets are off.

Stack's beef with the IRS apparently went back 30 years, to the early 80s, when he seems to have been involved with a tax resistance movement that was percolating around the country, particularly in California. In the note he apparently wrote the day of the attack, Stack holds forth at length on his grievances with the IRS. (The note's authenticity has not been confirmed by authorities.)

My friend....Dem's don't get involved in tax resistance movements because as proven in Obama's administration, they just don't pay them.

He's linked now.....
 
And you actually think there is no concerted effort to link this guy to the 'right wing extremists' from the left?

If they find he drove within two blocks of a tea party gig......all bets are off.



My friend....Dem's don't get involved in tax resistance movements because as proven in Obama's administration, they just don't pay them.

He's linked now.....
His final diatribe was not only about the IRS. Your point is well taken on the tax issue, but, his final rant mentions everything from a person with their left leg shorter than the right.
 
That would be your favorite lefty liberal mainstream media outlets, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NYT, etc. And im sure plenty of lefty politicians are going to jump all over it as well.
Please provide us all with the source/link where the so-called mainstream media linked this guy to the tea party.
 
Please provide us all with the source/link where the so-called mainstream media linked this guy to the tea party.
Tech,
Add substance to the topic please. You have not changed one iota. All you ever do is ask for a "source". Find it yourself. If you cannot, then post that, as Garf has already done in a previous post. Even though I disagree with Garf on many subjects, the poster at least looks into something before posting and does not immediately ask for "YOUR"(the poster) sacred sources.
All:
I posted this thread to stir debate. I have been away awhile from the boards because the "debate" always denegrates into....provide this source......look at this source. What about reasonable discussion of issues? OPINIONS?? Although I have not opined in some time, I have been purusing to "watch", if you will. Some of you people are like machines for God sake! You live here!

I digress.....GOOD DAY!
 
Tech,
Add substance to the topic please. You have not changed one iota. All you ever do is ask for a "source". Find it yourself. If you cannot, then post that, as Garf has already done in a previous post. Even though I disagree with Garf on many subjects, the poster at least looks into something before posting and does not immediately ask for "YOUR"(the poster) sacred sources.
All:
I posted this thread to stir debate. I have been away awhile from the boards because the "debate" always denegrates into....provide this source......look at this source. What about reasonable discussion of issues? OPINIONS?? Although I have not opined in some time, I have been purusing to "watch", if you will. Some of you people are like machines for God sake! You live here!

I digress.....GOOD DAY!
Airbud posted this:

I love how the liberal talking (open mouth breathers) heads try to tie this whacko to the Tea Party and as a right wing extremist.

If she actually heard this, it is very simple to provide the source of this information. If she wanted to give an opinion, she should not have made the statement in that manner. Maybe she should have said, "I am sure the talking heads will try and tie this guy to the tea party."

I don't know why you feel like you need to answer for airbud. In my opinion, you should let her speak for herself.

Back on topic.

I have not heard any of the news outlets tie this guy to anything but some rock band in Austin, The Milton Hershey School in PA, and his blog. Of course, I do not watch any of the liberal entertainment shows like Olberman, Maddow, or the rest. I also do not watch the mirrors of these like Hannity, Beck, O'Reilly, etc.

This guy was a nut case, plain and simple.

He really showed 'em by leaving behind a fatherless 12 year-old daughter and a now widowed wife.
 
I have not heard any of the news outlets tie this guy to anything but some rock band in Austin, The Milton Hershey School in PA, and his blog. Of course, I do not watch any of the liberal entertainment shows like Olberman, Maddow, or the rest. I also do not watch the mirrors of these like Hannity, Beck, O'Reilly, etc.

You a devout follower of the failing Obama kissing networks then......... :lol:

The point you're falling to see is MSM has been bending over backwards to find something, anything remotely connecting this guy to the right to assassinate the conservative movement that Obama has awoken.

MSM is quite in bed with the Obama agenda......more people should be shocked.

315_9-15-08_NR,_Obama_Pet_Peacock_-_jpg.jpg
 
The point you're falling to see is MSM has been bending over backwards to find something, anything remotely connecting this guy to the right to assassinate the conservative movement that Obama has awoken.
I have no doubt that some networks are doing just as you say. Just the same as Fox News tries to tie anything democratic to some kind of extreme liberal group such as acorn.

They are no longer news outlets, they are sensationalist reality entertainment providers. I get a small minority of my current events from television (the major networks that is).
 
Airbud posted this:



If she actually heard this, it is very simple to provide the source of this information. If she wanted to give an opinion, she should not have made the statement in that manner. Maybe she should have said, "I am sure the talking heads will try and tie this guy to the tea party."

I don't know why you feel like you need to answer for airbud. In my opinion, you should let her speak for herself.

Back on topic.

I have not heard any of the news outlets tie this guy to anything but some rock band in Austin, The Milton Hershey School in PA, and his blog. Of course, I do not watch any of the liberal entertainment shows like Olberman, Maddow, or the rest. I also do not watch the mirrors of these like Hannity, Beck, O'Reilly, etc.

This guy was a nut case, plain and simple.

He really showed 'em by leaving behind a fatherless 12 year-old daughter and a now widowed wife.
You really know how to be-clown oneself dont you? And im not a "she" either. Your an absolute embarrassment to the human race.
 
This guy was a nut case, plain and simple.

He really showed 'em by leaving behind a fatherless 12 year-old daughter and a now widowed wife.
Well....well...I agree with you on that, Techie. B)
 
I have no doubt that some networks are doing just as you say. Just the same as Fox News tries to tie anything democratic to some kind of extreme liberal group such as acorn.

They are no longer news outlets, they are sensationalist reality entertainment providers. I get a small minority of my current events from television (the major networks that is).


If they are I have not found them. the closest one I found was the Newsweek article that discussed the extreme rights actions but made a clear distinction that Stacks beliefs were all over the place and that he seemed to despise all of government not just one party or that he was associated with one party.

Just another accusation made by the OP and airbud with out any supporting evidence.

Fission, please don't patronize us by saying you were trying to stir debate. As is clearly evident by your avatar, you were trolling. You posted an accusation without any supporting evidence. if you were really trying to stir debate, you would have presented your theory (the liberal MSM is going to do ....) then you would have provided some sort of evidence to support your claim. You provided no such evidence. Then airbud jumped on the run away train and made further unsubstantiated claims. I posted articles from the sites that airbud cited showing that none of them made the accusation that you implied and airbud flat out said would make.

Airbuds responses have the intellectual equivalent of "did too". I do not recall many of your posts but I seem to recall you were better than that. Judging from your avatar, perhaps I was mistaken. If you want ot argue your point, by all means do so, but don't confuse making an accusation with out supporting evidence as an argument.
 
If they are I have not found them. the closest one I found was the Newsweek article that discussed the extreme rights actions but made a clear distinction that Stacks beliefs were all over the place and that he seemed to despise all of government not just one party or that he was associated with one party.

Just another accusation made by the OP and airbud with out any supporting evidence.

Fission, please don't patronize us by saying you were trying to stir debate. As is clearly evident by your avatar, you were trolling. You posted an accusation without any supporting evidence. if you were really trying to stir debate, you would have presented your theory (the liberal MSM is going to do ....) then you would have provided some sort of evidence to support your claim. You provided no such evidence. Then airbud jumped on the run away train and made further unsubstantiated claims. I posted articles from the sites that airbud cited showing that none of them made the accusation that you implied and airbud flat out said would make.

Airbuds responses have the intellectual equivalent of "did too". I do not recall many of your posts but I seem to recall you were better than that. Judging from your avatar, perhaps I was mistaken. If you want ot argue your point, by all means do so, but don't confuse making an accusation with out supporting evidence as an argument.

Spare me your drama, i could flood you two clowns all day with the facts and it wouldn't change your liberal lefty opinion one bit. All you would do is crawl back to your corner without a peep as usual. I didn't post for you or your brother Einstein benefit either. What you two have to say (or not) means very little to me and considered irrelevant. Those who are aware what i refereed to have seen exactly what im talking about, those that don't, wont. And never will. I could care less.

But it is entertaining watching you two spit and squirm over it. lol
 
I have no doubt that some networks are doing just as you say. Just the same as Fox News tries to tie anything democratic to some kind of extreme liberal group such as acorn.

They are no longer news outlets, they are sensationalist reality entertainment providers. I get a small minority of my current events from television (the major networks that is).


Its a rating driven sponsor paying thing.
Whats quite sad is MSM no longer asks those questions it did years ago....now they carry water for the guy they helped elect. Study the rules for radicals and you should see where MSM got all wrapped up in it.
Hate Bush....Hate Bush....
I watched little Katie for quite some time......recently I've gone to Bret Baier.....funny thing is I think they cover more things that need to be looked into than MSM. Say what you want about 'fair and balanced'....but they have a huge audience because they are asking questions that should be asked that aren't even looked at by MSM.
Why would Obama and his clowns make issue with Fox on the talking head Sunday shows?
Wanna know why?
Its in the rules for radicals.....

And to your Fox trying to tie DNC to everything.............what does your MSM do? 😱
See anybody in MSM going after Chuck Rangel? Or is that OK with you?
Fox goes after DNC there's usually a Fox in the hen house.....
 
Whats quite sad is MSM no longer asks those questions it did years ago....now they carry water for the guy they helped elect. Study the rules for radicals and you should see where MSM got all wrapped up in it.
News flash...

Fox news is Mainstream Media.
 
Fission, please don't patronize us by saying you were trying to stir debate. As is clearly evident by your avatar, you were trolling. You posted an accusation without any supporting evidence. if you were really trying to stir debate, you would have presented your theory (the liberal MSM is going to do ....) then you would have provided some sort of evidence to support your claim. You provided no such evidence. Then airbud jumped on the run away train and made further unsubstantiated claims. I posted articles from the sites that airbud cited showing that none of them made the accusation that you implied and airbud flat out said would make.
Oh, dear Garf.

#1 Patronizing..........I don't patronize. :shock:
#2 Because of my avatar....you have a clear understanding of all that I stand for? Just from an avatar. Man, you must be pretty doggone intelligent. :blink:
#3 You and Techie boy must be brothers....at least in blood. Your rants about "supporting" evidence are boorish to say the least. I will say, there was an article on the Hufffo- blow- hard- post that did indeed mention a reference to the terrorist/murderer(whatever) and the Tea Party. But at 5:30am and my desire to go to work, I failed to post a reference on this forum. I'm soooo sorry for that miscalculation. By noon.....the story was pulled. Believe me or not, take it for what it's worth.
#4 Airbud cited what he/she cited.....not me. You have a problem with Airbud, respond to the poster in the thread, to one of their opines, not mine. Or use the PM feature.

GOOD DAY!!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top