NYer
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 4,167
- Reaction score
- 905
Finger pointing? Was the TWU responsible for "Negotiating" the 2003 debacle? Was and is the TWU Airtransport Division dominated by Fleet? I was there and I am still living under the concessions. We had a meeting with Jim Little and when he was asked why AMTs were being forced more concessions than others he claimed everyone got the same. When it was pointed out that not only did we take a higher pay cut but lost longevity and sick pay too he again claimed we all lost the same. Then when it was asked why we had to give up sick pay he said they wanted to take our license pay. Since we are the only ones with licenses and no other group has them we were on the hook for that value along with the other concessions. So no we did not all lose the same. It is what it is and what is done is done. I am not wanting that to happen again where the AMTs get hosed and the TWU tries to say we didn't. I'm sure if we were offered full sick pay like you never lost though you would want equal value even though you never lost it right? That is part of the problem. We should get everything back that Fleet never lost before anyone else gets a single thing. And since you didn't have to give it up we should not have to give something up to get it. If you disagree with that then that is Exhibit A on why we need to separate. Are you going to agree that we should get sick pay and longevity without Fleet getting something of equal value? I didn't think so.
If you negotiate something and Fleet doesn't an we view it in, guess what? That would be our fault for voting it in.
Maintenance has 50% pay on first SK call. Fleet doesn't, we get 100%. That's Fleet's fault too? =/
And to be clear, your original post on this was about current negotiations and even went into the BK. Now this answer goes back to 2003? Pick a decade.