You rang?He was one of the Union trustees but is no longer listed.
Besides the fact that this IAMPF talk is nothing but a drag back through the weeds. There has been ZERO proof provided that the IAMPF talk here has any merit.
The fact is I also was informed by two TWU President’s that Brother Pantoja did say they were not tied to the IAMPF if a suitable financial replacement was offered (5% Contribution, 4% Match not being that)
This is nothing more than a pullback into the weeds topic meant for the “sick” pleasure of one poster on here who no longer has a vote in anything that the rest of us continue to enjoy.
(The daily stupidity here now should be along momentarily)