I will vote "NO" on anything that is including the removal of the 4th line. I would think that anyone would. However, I am hearing (from hangar talk) that the majority of the Dallas guys are thinking that all the other stations don't care about the 4th line going away and will vote yes just to get the pay-out. I don't think this is true. Our outstation folks are smart enough to see that any headcount at any station would better protect us all. If SWA had to do a major lay-off, rif, or reduction of some sort, they will have to start at the bottom and move upward in the scenoirity list. The more that are at the bottom the more the upper list is protected. Yea, I know, SWA will never do that. You never know that to be fact, we all must prepare ourselves for the absolute worse case scenerio. If we don't, alot of us will be looking back to our 2012 Amendable Contract asking, "why in the $#@# did we vote to allow that 4th line to go buy-buy??" I also think that we will never have another oppertunity to get a 4th line of maint back into Dallas (or anywhere, for that matter). The company only agreed to the 4th line to get the almighty elsovador crap to pass, knowing full well, that they were going after the 4th line some time in the future--And here we are. It's time for us all to get on the same page and tell the company by a 100% majority, that they can forget getting rid of the 4th line, Then move on with the contract negotiations with no further 4th line discussions except for the fact of it starting by July 2013. Already late from when it was suppose to start. Stay united guys. From what I understand the nego team is standing strong on this 4th line.