With the recent passage of the IBT M&R agreement I'm a bit puzzled. The IBT is telling UPS that $46.99 is not enough for the A&Ps yet they told mechanics at Continental that $36.52 is a good deal. One of my contacts informed me that Continental mechanics at EWR questioned this and the response was "you are comparing apples to oranges". Really? Well does an applle become an orange depending on its location and who is buying it? Would an Apple still be an Apple and an Orange still be an Orange no matter who the buyer was and where it was sold?
EWR has a decent UPS presence. If a mechanic quits Continental and is hired by UPS has he majically transformed himself from an apple to an orange, or is he still an A&P with the same exact skillsets and liabilities? Is a 767 freighter really that different from a 767 passenger airplane, does it carry $10/hr worth of adiitional liability and difficulty? What makes the A&P at Continental worth $10/hr less than the mechanic at UPS?
The fact is that $46.99 is a fair price for an A&P. Its around what the industry paid in 2002, once inflation is thrown in.
An A&P wortking at EWR on heavy transport aircraft carries virtually the same exact skillsets and liabilitise whether he is working or freighters or passenger planes. They are no different, they are the same. They are not different species, they are the same species, the IBT has just decided for some reason that Continental should get a really good deal.
EWR has a decent UPS presence. If a mechanic quits Continental and is hired by UPS has he majically transformed himself from an apple to an orange, or is he still an A&P with the same exact skillsets and liabilities? Is a 767 freighter really that different from a 767 passenger airplane, does it carry $10/hr worth of adiitional liability and difficulty? What makes the A&P at Continental worth $10/hr less than the mechanic at UPS?
The fact is that $46.99 is a fair price for an A&P. Its around what the industry paid in 2002, once inflation is thrown in.
An A&P wortking at EWR on heavy transport aircraft carries virtually the same exact skillsets and liabilitise whether he is working or freighters or passenger planes. They are no different, they are the same. They are not different species, they are the same species, the IBT has just decided for some reason that Continental should get a really good deal.