April/May 2013 Pilot Discussion

[end_of_alpa]

One more time:

23 While USAPA notes that a JCBA must still be negotiated following the merger,​

. 24 and asserts that the MOU is therefore not a “final product” and “does not affect [the ​

. 1 ripeness] analysis at all” (USAPA’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 44) at pp. 9-10 (pp. 14- ​

. 2 15 of the ECF filing)), it fails to mention that the MOU itself has already determined and ​

. 3 sharply circumscribed the parameters of the JCBA. ​

You clowns just voted in a contract and didn't even realize it. The company totally baked you east idiots!!! LOL

Dude, if you read the WHOLE pleading (which is have baked as it is) the Company is not really making a cogent argument. And in any case, it may be the companies weak attempt at a pleading, but it doesn't really bring a clear and cogent argument. We'll just have to wait for Silver in May. SYIC

 

[Phoenix]

One more time:

23 While USAPA notes that a JCBA must still be negotiated following the merger,​

. 24 and asserts that the MOU is therefore not a “final product” and “does not affect [the ​

. 1 ripeness] analysis at all” (USAPA’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 44) at pp. 9-10 (pp. 14- ​

. 2 15 of the ECF filing)), it fails to mention that the MOU itself has already determined and ​

. 3 sharply circumscribed the parameters of the JCBA. ​

You clowns just voted in a contract and didn't even realize it. The company totally baked you east idiots!!! LOL

Contingently, sharply circumscribes...

Be that as it may, the same laws that govern USAPA's right and responsibility to negotiate SLI with the company (as opposed to anyone dictating it to them) are the same laws that assign them the right and responsibility to negotiate at any time with any party regarding SLI, i.e. during MB negotiations. The laws have not changed, but of course there is one new relevant fact.. the new contingent MOU in which all parties chose for MB procedure to govern, irrespective of its previous applicability.

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

Dude, if you read the WHOLE pleading (which is have baked as it is) the Company is not really making a cogent argument. And in any case, it may be the companies weak attempt at a pleading, but it doesn't really bring a clear and cogent argument. We'll just have to wait for Silver in May. SYIC

HERE IS PRECHILL http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkwT8W2JLYo

 

[Black Swan]

Be fore caddie. The birth of this forums cadence from the west.

http://leonidas.cact...nstructions.pdf

Unbelievable tampering by Wake. He had no idea of RLA law. No wonder he got spanked in the face! And the West pilots honestly try and believe any jury would not have delivered the same verdict against USAPA after being given those biased and misguided instructions.
Pretty much this- " you must find USAPA guilty or not innocent......."

 

[nevergiveup]

Well said, you are exactly correct. I'm not surprised Janie and crew cannot figure out what's about to hit them, but the company was quite clear that they as well as the UCC, AMR and AOL have identified a new set of circumstances which makes this ripe. In case you haven't heard, Jamie, there is a merger going on and this thing called an MOU which is a contract between all parties. Everyone knows it's ripe, hard for you to accept, I understand. Your ignorance has ensured the Nicolau will be put into effect. Thank you for removing the AWA MEC and then voting in a contract- you made this easier for us in the west.

Truly, the company's filing lays it out beautifully for all of us on here. Upon POR the west has won.

A hidden JCBA in the MOU. Wow, that's incredible, you west guys are brilliant! Move is brilliant!

 

[prechilill]

A hidden JCBA in the MOU. Wow, that's incredible, you west guys are brilliant! Move is brilliant!

Talk to the company, it's in their filing. You're screwed buddy. 🙂

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

Unbelievable tampering by Wake. He had no idea of RLA law. No wonder he got spanked in the face! And the West pilots honestly try and believe any jury would not have delivered the same verdict against USAPA after being given those biased and misguided instructions.
Pretty much this- " you must find USAPA guilty or not innocent......."

http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/chambers/index.php?id=9
BALDOCK, ROBERT TITANIUM MEMBER AOL

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

Talk about political influence how bout down right WAKE's down right personal influence !

 

[Beancounter]

If I remember right people asked the lawyers if the MOU constituted a contract, prior to the voting. The lawyers answer was yes, this isn't a surprise to anyone is it?

Bean

 

[cactusboy53]

http://www.ca10.usco.../index.php?id=9
BALDOCK, ROBERT TITANIUM MEMBER AOL

Mut;
For those of us that are slow, would you mind explaining your post? Are you insinuating that Judge Wake is guilty of tampering because of any relationship that he may have with Judge Baldock? Are you further insinuating that the relationship between Judge Baldock & his son then somehow influenced Judge Wake in the court proceedings in Addington v. USAPA?

Please be sure to show your work......OR, ARE YOU A BIG BAG OF WIND?

 

[nevergiveup]

Talk to the company, it's in their filing. You're screwed buddy. 🙂

Do you recall what also happens at the POR?

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

If I remember right people asked the lawyers if the MOU constituted a contract, prior to the voting. The lawyers answer was yes, this isn't a surprise to anyone is it?

Bean

Well BEAN actually NO!, What is hilarious to the EAST is the fact the attrition train has started, the MOU has an expiration date of 2018 and you voted to change the TA! STAGNATION NATION , the WEST choice!

 

[cactusboy53]

Unbelievable tampering by Wake. He had no idea of RLA law. No wonder he got spanked in the face! And the West pilots honestly try and believe any jury would not have delivered the same verdict against USAPA after being given those biased and misguided instructions.
Pretty much this- " you must find USAPA guilty or not innocent......."

Swanny;
Would you be so kind to show your proof of the honorable Judge Wake's "tampering"? Would you be so kind to expound on how "he got spanked in the face" by the the 9th Apellate Court (I presume that is the "spanking" that you refer to). Your legal opinions are awaited. Teach us, oh master...........

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

Mut;
For those of us that are slow, would you mind explaining your post? Are you insinuating that Judge Wake is guilty of tampering because of any relationship that he may have with Judge Baldock? Are you further insinuating that the relationship between Judge Baldock & his son then somehow influenced Judge Wake in the court proceedings in Addington v. USAPA?

Please be sure to show your work......OR, ARE YOU A BIG BAG OF WIND?

NO but thank you for pointing it out! The South starts with S, but Slow aint part of the equation!

 

[cactusboy53]

Well BEAN actually NO!, What is hilarious to the EAST is the fact the attrition train has started, the MOU has an expiration date of 2018 and you voted to change the TA! STAGNATION NATION , the WEST choice!

Oh, I understand now. You really aren't right (legally speaking), but with aid you are capturing US Airways upgrades that (with the installment of the Nicolau) do not belong to you. In other words, you are a cheat AND you some how find that "hilarious". Very interesting.