April/May 2013 Pilot Discussion

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

Mut;
For those of us that are slow, would you mind explaining your post? Are you insinuating that Judge Wake is guilty of tampering because of any relationship that he may have with Judge Baldock? Are you further insinuating that the relationship between Judge Baldock & his son then somehow influenced Judge Wake in the court proceedings in Addington v. USAPA?

Please be sure to show your work......OR, ARE YOU A BIG BAG OF WIND?

A BIG BAG OF WIND? I just showed my work! FORE!

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

Oh, I understand now. You really aren't right (legally speaking), but with aid you are capturing US Airways upgrades that (with the installment of the Nicolau) do not belong to you. In other words, you are a cheat AND you some how find that "hilarious". Very interesting.

We have no JCBA, excuse me but there are no pilots on my contract that are not bidding vacancies on my contractual list, your attrition and growth are yours enjoy! Cheating what LOA 93 not a PHX pilot on it! MM!

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

Oh, I understand now. You really aren't right (legally speaking), but with aid you are capturing US Airways upgrades that (with the installment of the Nicolau) do not belong to you. In other words, you are a cheat AND you some how find that "hilarious". Very interesting.

Well they do belong to the EAST I do not see a PHX position open on that bid did you?

 

[prechilill]

Do you recall what also happens at the POR?

I'm getting my 330 captain bid

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

I'm getting my 330 captain bid

HEY you have to be on that list! http://www.google.co...iw=1280&bih=572 WEBBER, RUSSELL R TITANIUM! HER HUSBAND DUI the best man?

 

[electricjet98]

Yes they have won the ability to determine your shorts are ripe, real ripe! A memorandum of understanding (MoU) is a document describing a bilateral or multilateral agreement between two or more parties. It expresses a convergence of will between the parties, indicating an intended common line of action. It is often used in cases where parties either do not imply a legal commitment or in situations where the parties cannot create a legally enforceable agreement. It is a more formal alternative to a gentlemen's agreement

Yes, similar to a tentative agreement. And by ratifying it, it is now a contract.

 

[Phoenix]

Talk to the company, it's in their filing. You're screwed buddy. 🙂

If the company or West pilots desired the MOU to alter USAPA's right and responsibility to negotiate an SLI within a wide range of reasonableness, on behalf of all its pilots, then they should have insisted the MOU stipulate as much.

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

If the company or West pilots desired the MOU to alter USAPA's right and responsibility to negotiate an SLI within a wide range of reasonableness, on behalf of all its pilots, then they should have insisted the MOU stipulate as much.

ELISE EBERWINE OUR VP OF COMM(HER SPOUSE IS AOL TITANIUM MEMBER WEBER, SO SHE IS AN AOL MEMBER ALSO) is behind these filings! MM

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

THANX GARY!

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

Yes, similar to a tentative agreement. And by ratifying it, it is now a contract.

The T/A had a clause to change IT! CHANGED!

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

Yes, similar to a tentative agreement. And by ratifying it, it is now a contract.

The definition makes no mention to T/A! No way similar, get a BA!

 

[electricjet98]

If the company or West pilots desired the MOU to alter USAPA's right and responsibility to negotiate an SLI within a wide range of reasonableness, on behalf of all its pilots, then they should have insisted the MOU stipulate as much.

USAPA has never shown any degree of "reasonableness" and it is not up to a group of east pilots to tell me what my seniority is worth.

Paraphrasing Judge Silver..."A neutral arbitrator's decision is powerfull evidence of a fair award".

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

USAPA has never shown any degree of "reasonableness" and it is not up to a group of east pilots to tell me what my seniority is worth.

Paraphrasing Judge Silver..."A neutral arbitrator's decision is powerfull evidence of a fair award".

well your next post might parphrase the "legal award' BECAUSE AN OPINIONS ARE LIKE ASS, WELL, OK!

 

[prechilill]

If the company or West pilots desired the MOU to alter USAPA's right and responsibility to negotiate an SLI within a wide range of reasonableness, on behalf of all its pilots, then they should have insisted the MOU stipulate as much.

98%. Lol!!

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

USAPA has never shown any degree of "reasonableness" and it is not up to a group of east pilots to tell me what my seniority is worth.

Paraphrasing Judge Silver..."A neutral arbitrator's decision is powerfull evidence of a fair award".

To me they are very reasonable, what is your dilemma?