Article - US Airways' local service unlikely to grow

jimcfs

Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
983
8
Athens, WV
www.cfld.com
From PIT Tribune-Review.

US Airways' local service unlikely to grow
By Rick Stouffer
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Friday, July 27, 2007

Pittsburgh's size and attractiveness to low-cost airlines are two strikes against Pittsburgh International Airport winning additional US Airways flights, a top airline executive said Thursday.

US Airways President Scott Kirby said the Pittsburgh market is important to US Airways, as it selected the region as the site for its new $25 million to-be-built operations center. But when it comes to flights in and out of Pittsburgh International, airline passengers shouldn't expect service downsizing to reverse within the foreseeable future.

"We continue to try to make Pittsburgh work for us," said Kirby, during a conference call to discuss US Airways' second-quarter financial results. "If we can sustain the service level there we will, but we won't operate unprofitable routes."

This month, the airline further slashed its departures to 127 per day from 148 earlier this year. US Airways' departures from Pittsburgh have declined from 245 in November 2004, shortly after the airline's second bankruptcy filing, and almost 400 in fall 2003. The airline operated more than 500 flights a day in summer 2001 out of Pittsburgh, when the airport still served as a hub.

Kirby said US Airways has no further plans to pull back service in and out of Pittsburgh International, adding that many of the cuts this summer are due to its Express (commuter) partners having a difficult time finding qualified pilots.

"Pittsburgh has great public officials, including (Allegheny County Airport Authority Executive Director) Kent George, but Pittsburgh is a relatively small city, and it's very attractive to low-cost carriers," Kirby said. "Those two things don't make it attractive to a hub carrier."

"That information has been conveyed to Kent in the past," Airport Authority spokeswoman JoAnn Jenny said. "It's been the strategy of the Authority not to depend on the hub carrier, but to go out and recruit low-cost carriers. It's our job to defend and represent the area."

George on Wednesday said that the influx of low-cost carriers, including Southwest Airlines, JetBlue Airways and AirTran Airways, was the reason average fares have significantly dropped at Pittsburgh International, and why passenger volumes are increasing.

Increased expenses related to its operations improvement plan and aircraft maintenance weighed on US Airways Group Inc.'s bottom line as the air carrier yesterday reported a 13.6 percent drop in net income for the three months ended June 30.

The Tempe, Ariz.-based company reported net income of $263 million, or $2.77 a share, down from $305 million, or $3.25 a share, in the year-earlier period.

Aircraft maintenance expenses rose to $170 million from $153 million, associated with the return of leased aircraft and engine overhaul timing, along with increased investment in aircraft operations, the company said.

Revenues for the quarter slightly dropped, to $3.15 billion from $3.17 billion one year ago. Passenger revenue from mainline operations slightly increased, while Express or commuter and cargo revenues fell.

"This was our sixth consecutive quarter of profitability, showing the value of the merger," said US Airways Group CEO Doug Parker. "We are flying right now as good as any airline, and the revenue environment going into the third quarter looks rather encouraging."

Kirby added that he expects much improved revenues in the third quarter, with significant growth in business demand.

Parker said US Airways on June 30 had about $3.5 billion in cash on hand. Asked if those funds could be used for an acquisition, the US Airway's CEO said no.

"It's more important to us to have more cash on hand than anyone else, given the industry's current situation," Parker said.
 
From PIT Tribune-Review.

US Airways' local service unlikely to grow
By Rick Stouffer
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Friday, July 27, 2007

Pittsburgh's size and attractiveness to low-cost airlines are two strikes against Pittsburgh International Airport winning additional US Airways flights, a top airline executive said Thursday.

US Airways President Scott Kirby said the Pittsburgh market is important to US Airways, as it selected the region as the site for its new $25 million to-be-built operations center. But when it comes to flights in and out of Pittsburgh International, airline passengers shouldn't expect service downsizing to reverse within the foreseeable future.

"We continue to try to make Pittsburgh work for us," said Kirby, during a conference call to discuss US Airways' second-quarter financial results. "If we can sustain the service level there we will, but we won't operate unprofitable routes."

This month, the airline further slashed its departures to 127 per day from 148 earlier this year. US Airways' departures from Pittsburgh have declined from 245 in November 2004, shortly after the airline's second bankruptcy filing, and almost 400 in fall 2003. The airline operated more than 500 flights a day in summer 2001 out of Pittsburgh, when the airport still served as a hub.

Kirby said US Airways has no further plans to pull back service in and out of Pittsburgh International, adding that many of the cuts this summer are due to its Express (commuter) partners having a difficult time finding qualified pilots.

"Pittsburgh has great public officials, including (Allegheny County Airport Authority Executive Director) Kent George, but Pittsburgh is a relatively small city, and it's very attractive to low-cost carriers," Kirby said. "Those two things don't make it attractive to a hub carrier."

"That information has been conveyed to Kent in the past," Airport Authority spokeswoman JoAnn Jenny said. "It's been the strategy of the Authority not to depend on the hub carrier, but to go out and recruit low-cost carriers. It's our job to defend and represent the area."

George on Wednesday said that the influx of low-cost carriers, including Southwest Airlines, JetBlue Airways and AirTran Airways, was the reason average fares have significantly dropped at Pittsburgh International, and why passenger volumes are increasing.

Increased expenses related to its operations improvement plan and aircraft maintenance weighed on US Airways Group Inc.'s bottom line as the air carrier yesterday reported a 13.6 percent drop in net income for the three months ended June 30.

The Tempe, Ariz.-based company reported net income of $263 million, or $2.77 a share, down from $305 million, or $3.25 a share, in the year-earlier period.

Aircraft maintenance expenses rose to $170 million from $153 million, associated with the return of leased aircraft and engine overhaul timing, along with increased investment in aircraft operations, the company said.

Revenues for the quarter slightly dropped, to $3.15 billion from $3.17 billion one year ago. Passenger revenue from mainline operations slightly increased, while Express or commuter and cargo revenues fell.

"This was our sixth consecutive quarter of profitability, showing the value of the merger," said US Airways Group CEO Doug Parker. "We are flying right now as good as any airline, and the revenue environment going into the third quarter looks rather encouraging."

Kirby added that he expects much improved revenues in the third quarter, with significant growth in business demand.

Parker said US Airways on June 30 had about $3.5 billion in cash on hand. Asked if those funds could be used for an acquisition, the US Airway's CEO said no.

"It's more important to us to have more cash on hand than anyone else, given the industry's current situation," Parker said.

Kirby, "Pittsburgh is a relatively small city, and it's very attractive to low-cost carriers," Kirby said. "Those two things don't make it attractive to a hub carrier."

But i thought US Airways was a low-cost carrier, hence the stock ticker LCC???

Then Doogie had this to say,

"We are flying right now as good as any airline, and the revenue environment going into the third quarter looks rather encouraging."

Okie dokie, if you say so.

And then he blatantly lied when he said this,

Parker said US Airways on June 30 had about $3.5 billion in cash on hand. Asked if those funds could be used for an acquisition, the US Airway's CEO said no.

"It's more important to us to have more cash on hand than anyone else, given the industry's current situation," Parker said.

More cash on hand than anybody else??? Really???

In the June 2007 quarter Delta generated $1.1 billion in free cash flow. As of June 30, 2007, Delta had $3.7 billion in cash on hand.

And UAL,

Grew its cash and short-term investments balance by $895 million to $5.1 billion at June 30, 2007.

And finally AA,

AMR ended the second quarter with approximately $6.4 billion in cash on-hand

I truly believe that Douglas Parker and his lapdog Scott Kirby, or is it the other way around? are delusional.
 
Delusional....

No just out of rehab...

Make no mistake..we're making money on the backs of employees and past suppliers who got stiffed in bankruptcy...

Operationally we're a mess. Qik - Shares is a joke....
 
Also in today's news:

World: World is round, say 'Explorers'

Entertainment: Lohan may have drinking problem

Travel: Iraq tourism unlikely to pick up this year

Religion: Pope Catholic

Health: Heroin, crack cocaine, may be bad for you
 
Also in today's news:

World: World is round, say 'Explorers'

Entertainment: Lohan may have drinking problem

Travel: Iraq tourism unlikely to pick up this year

Religion: Pope Catholic

Health: Heroin, crack cocaine, may be bad for you
:lol: Lohan MAY have a drinking problem <HA> more like the Trainwreck fell far off the rail. And THAT'S Entertainment! Any chance her and Dougie share stories and Starbucks at the Betty Ford Clinic?! :rolleyes:
 
Where's the "rehab" for all the "re-hub PIT" People?
It's just like crack...they can't put down the pipe!

I got an idea,lets send all yens in PHX to lets say,ORD for the winter.Or 2 or 3 and see how the story changes. :up:
 
Where's the "rehab" for all the "re-hub PIT" People?
It's just like crack...they can't put down the pipe!

It's not necessary. We may not have the flights, but we still can do the job better than anyone else. Who cares that we don't fly to as many places? We still get paid for the same eight hours+, and we still take pride in the work that we do.

It will be the same no matter how many times Tempe "right-sizes" PIT.

The lies eventually catch up with the liars. Like I said before: If money is all that those guys care about, it will be their undoing in the end.
 
It's not necessary. We may not have the flights, but we still can do the job better than anyone else. Who cares that we don't fly to as many places? We still get paid for the same eight hours+, and we still take pride in the work that we do.

It will be the same no matter how many times Tempe "right-sizes" PIT.

The lies eventually catch up with the liars. Like I said before: If money is all that those guys care about, it will be their undoing in the end.
So true my freind,and I dont guess they have checked the loads out of PIT lately,there full....hum havnt we visited this in the past.

Seems like the uppers answer to full loads is to drop instead of add flts...gotta scratch my head.... :rolleyes:
 
So true my freind,and I dont guess they have checked the loads out of PIT lately,there full....hum havnt we visited this in the past.

Seems like the uppers answer to full loads is to drop instead of add flts...gotta scratch my head.... :rolleyes:

It's been the same since before BK2. Cut full flights out of PIT, then cry that either 1) The company isn't making as much money from PIT as they used to, or 2) Those full flights aren't yielding as much profit as they could from another hub.

Typical BS. BTW, for Kirby to blame Express carrier "partners" for the lack of pilots is deceptive. PSA and Piedmont seem to have a fair share of the flight crew woes he speaks of, and last time I checked they were subsidiaries of US. Does it have anything to do with J4J? Impending retirements of Mainline pilots? It very well might. And unlike Republic and Air Wisconsin crew shortages, which IMO tend to be either sporadic or due to the end-of-the-month dispatch blues, the WO problems are ongoing and constant, and the respective WO crew scheduling departments are suffering from attrition as well.

No number of different cancellation codes can hide the fact that CREW is the number one reason US cancels Express flights. It's disappointing to see MECH, OPS, EQUIP or WX codes when we know perfectly well it's none of those reasons.
 
US Airways' local service unlikely to grow
By Rick Stouffer
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Friday, July 27, 2007

Pittsburgh's size and attractiveness to low-cost airlines are two strikes against Pittsburgh International Airport winning additional US Airways flights, a top airline executive said Thursday.

Translation: We want hubs in huge cities with no competition!

US Airways President Scott Kirby said the Pittsburgh market is important to US Airways, as it selected the region as the site for its new $25 million to-be-built operations center. But when it comes to flights in and out of Pittsburgh International, airline passengers shouldn't expect service downsizing to reverse within the foreseeable future.

"We continue to try to make Pittsburgh work for us," said Kirby, during a conference call to discuss US Airways' second-quarter financial results. "If we can sustain the service level there we will, but we won't operate unprofitable routes."

Interesting how Southwest, with higher pay rates, can operate PIT flights profitably but US can't.

"Pittsburgh has great public officials, including (Allegheny County Airport Authority Executive Director) Kent George, but Pittsburgh is a relatively small city, and it's very attractive to low-cost carriers," Kirby said. "Those two things don't make it attractive to a hub carrier."

As pointed out by delta777, LCC saying that it's attractive only to other "lcc"'s is laughable.

Kirby added that he expects much improved revenues in the third quarter, with significant growth in business demand.

I've had a tough day, and I needed the laugh. :lol:

I wonder what business sector they expect to give them significant growth? Rappers? Drug dealers? Ghetto Rims 'R Us?

"It's more important to us to have more cash on hand than anyone else, given the industry's current situation," Parker said.

Translation: the next BK will be a Chapter 7, so we better hang on to as much cash as we can.
 
PIT is gone, even as a 'FOCUS' city.

The unbelieveably smart, and occasionally sober, prodigies who think Hell with the lid off is preparation for life after death would rather get rid of people who know more than they do than listen to them.

Hire more consultants, take a kickback.

And rot in Hell Chugalug and Snot.

Too bad there is no where worse to send you than Tempe.
 
PIT is gone, even as a 'FOCUS' city.

The unbelieveably smart, and occasionally sober, prodigies who think Hell with the lid off is preparation for life after death would rather get rid of people who know more than they do than listen to them.

Hire more consultants, take a kickback.

And rot in Hell Chugalug and Snot.

Too bad there is no where worse to send you than Tempe.
Wow ! You are friends with US1YFARE.
 

Latest posts