What's new

Congrats Michael Sam!

AdAstraPerAspera said:
When you've been told for centuries what you are is shameful, it is natural to be celebrate it when you can now be proud of it.
 
Perhaps those telling for centuries were correct in their analysis. It was lobbying that changed the rules.
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
When you've been told for centuries what you are is shameful, it is natural to be celebrate it when you can now be proud of it.
Keep shouting from the roof tops.   Given the current climate I think marriage equality and all that goes with it is just around the corner.
 
delldude said:
 
Perhaps those telling for centuries were correct in their analysis. It was lobbying science that changed the rules.
 
FIFY.
 
Those throughout history didn't have the scientific knowledge base yet. You lose.
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
 
FIFY.
 
Those throughout history didn't have the scientific knowledge base yet. You lose.
 
Scientific knowledge base from pressuring psychologists?
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
The scientific method isn't subject to opinions or politics, sorry.
Yeah, not sure I'd agree with you on that. Just look at the "data" on global warming.
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
 
Your own article lead in disproves your point.
 
 
Genes examined in study are not sufficient or necessary to make men gay but do play some role in sexuality, say US researchers
 
Shooting in the dark as much as farting contributes to global warming .
 
From your same article:
 
 
A study of gay men in the US has found fresh evidence that male sexual orientation is influenced by genes.
 
So WTF is it? influenced or not?
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
When you've been told for centuries what you are is shameful, it is natural to be celebrate it when you can now be proud of it.
It is shameful. What exactly are you proud of? That you can live an unnatural lifestyle and disgust people.
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
Those throughout history didn't have the scientific knowledge base yet. You lose.
GMAFB. There was absolutely nothing scientific about them removing homosexuality as a mental disease. It was political. 
 
Speak for yourself. If i "disgust" you, that's your problem, not mine. And you belong to an ever-shrinking minority.

And when applied as intended, the Scientific Method is about gathering data, experimenting, and testing known hypotheses. There's no step on the checklist for a scientist to insert her/his opinion. Then hopefully someone independently peer reviews their work to confirm it. That is how it us supposed to work. Are there people who have allied it to become corrupted by biases, politics, or business interests? Of course, but I would argue that they aren't True scientists, then.

And just as I know identical twins who are both gay, I also know twin pairs who are not. Also, my younger brother, the most genetically similar person to me on the planet, is heterosexual. But the article I mentioned indicates there are genetic factors, it's not my problem if someone has a comprehension issue.

also, FWIW, Lulu, you might want to reconsider using the word "disgust" when referring to others. Your glass house is becoming a target
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
It is shameful. What exactly are you proud of? That you can live an unnatural lifestyle and disgust people.
 

GMAFB. There was absolutely nothing scientific about them removing homosexuality as a mental disease. It was political.
The more important question is what scientific evidence was there that it was put in the DSM in the first place
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
But the article I mentioned indicates there are genetic factors, it's not my problem if someone has a comprehension issue.
How many years until the pedophiles start using that one?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top