What's new

Congrats Michael Sam!

AdAstraPerAspera said:
Wow, the only sick thing happening here is the amount of glee sme people are taking in watching a man's career stumble, simply because he is gay.
 
He got cut in the begining and that was it until some asss in the NFL thought it would be good copy if Sam got picked up to a practice squad bypassing others who were most likely better players so the NFL could have a 'moment' with the gay community.
 
That in itself is biased bullshit.
 
That's not bullshit. It's pro sports. Sorry that you fail to grasp that there are economic factos at play, not political ones. Managers don't make roster decisions based on politics, sorry. They're just selling entertainment. Sorry if that is difficult to understand for you.
 
being an NFL practice squad player is a nice paying gig compared to the usual 1st job out of collage ,around 7500 a week I think during the season.
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
That's not bullshit. It's pro sports. Sorry that you fail to grasp that there are economic factos at play, not political ones. Managers don't make roster decisions based on politics, sorry. They're just selling entertainment. Sorry if that is difficult to understand for you.
 
Says, Mr. Politically Correct!
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
By the way I never got your response on this...
 
http://www.cdc.gov/h.../ataglance.html
 
https://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/hrc-issue-brief-hiv-aids-and-the-lgbt-community#_ftn2
 
Although MSM represent about 4% of the male population in the United States, in 2010, MSM accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males and 63% of all new infections. 
 
Let's see you libtard spin your way out of that.
 
EDIT: Upon checking my links I noticed the CDC link from before was broken. I did a Google search and found a replacement. The I found something even more interesting.
 
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/surveillance/incidence/
 
Although MSM represent about 7% of the male population in the United States, in 2010 MSM accounted for 78% of the new HIV infections among males.
 
Funny how that "represented" percentage went up 3 percent but the percentage of infections remained the same.
 
Ministry of Truth
Well?
 
Run from the truth you coward.
 
I see you libtards won't even touch this
 
Here goes the guy who does not believe statistics, quoting himself quoting statistics again.

And they have noting to do with NFL.

I have to admit that you have keen interest in all threads gay...
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
Here goes the guy who does not believe statistics, quoting himself quoting statistics again.

And they have noting to do with NFL.

I have to admit that you have keen interest in all threads gay...
You do have a valid point.  I wonder if La La will see the irony. 
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
Well?
 
Run from the truth you coward.
 
I see you libtards won't even touch this
 
First of all, I'm not a liberal, but I see that any person who disagrees with you is, right?
 
Second, you seem to behave as if it is hot news that anal sex is the most efficiently successful way of transmitting HIV, but as far as I know, that has been common knowledge since the late 80's, so I'm not really sure why you're making such a party out of it. Safe and effective sex techniques can make the risk minimal. Not to mention, when a positive person's viral load is at an undetectable level, you can confidently have sex with them knowing the risk of transmission is so low that transmission would be extremely difficult.
 
Oh, and did you know they even make a pill, now?
 
http://www.truvada.com
 
Yes, it's called Truvada. It is a daily pill taken by an HIV-negative person. When used properly, you can effectively reduce your risk of infection to even lower than that of condom-sex!
 
The future has arrived! And it is getting better every day!
 
What say you now, huh? Lol
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
Here goes the guy who does not believe statistics, quoting himself quoting statistics again.

And they have noting to do with NFL.

I have to admit that you have keen interest in all threads gay...
This is not a "statistic" it is an accurate count of all NEW infections taken by the CDC. It is not calculated using sampling. It is calculated using hard numbers.
 
Try to spin it some more Glenn.
 
AdAstraPerAspera said:
 
First of all, I'm not a liberal, but I see that any person who disagrees with you is, right?
 
Second, you seem to behave as if it is hot news that anal sex is the most efficiently successful way of transmitting HIV, but as far as I know, that has been common knowledge since the late 80's, so I'm not really sure why you're making such a party out of it. Safe and effective sex techniques can make the risk minimal. Not to mention, when a positive person's viral load is at an undetectable level, you can confidently have sex with them knowing the risk of transmission is so low that transmission would be extremely difficult.
 
Oh, and did you know they even make a pill, now?
 
http://www.truvada.com
 
Yes, it's called Truvada. It is a daily pill taken by an HIV-negative person. When used properly, you can effectively reduce your risk of infection to even lower than that of condom-sex!
 
The future has arrived! And it is getting better every day!
 
What say you now, huh? Lol
I say some heterosexual people also engage in anal sex but have nowhere NEAR the infection rate.
 
The fact the infection rate is so high suggest a lot of casual sex in the gay community (probably at public parks and rest stops)
 
I guess gay people just can't control their impulses.
 
The fact the infection rate is so high suggest a lot of casual sex in the gay community (probably at public parks and rest stops)
Heteros just don't do those things
 

Latest posts

Back
Top