What's new

Deep Doo-doo

JetClipper said:
However, while publicly espousing Islam, when behind closed doors Saudi princes use oil money to fund a lifestyle so immoral it would make the Romans’ eyes water (e.g. drugs, prostitution, etc.). This dichotomy has not gone unnoticed by the extremists; add this to the growing divide between rich and poor in Saudi Arabia, and you’ve got all the ingredients for an Islamic revolution that will make 1979 Iran look like a dinner party.
JetClipper, you make it sound like it is only the saudi royals who are hypocrites. Not so. Most muslims are hypocrites. I seem to recall that at least a couple of the terrorists from 911 were in strip bars in the week prior.
 
iflyjetz said:
Most muslims are hypocrites.
You use the example of fewer than a dozen people to make summary judgement of millions? :down:
 
iflyjetz said:
JetClipper, you make it sound like it is only the saudi royals who are hypocrites. Not so. Most muslims are hypocrites. I seem to recall that at least a couple of the terrorists from 911 were in strip bars in the week prior.
That was just in case the 99 virgins thing didn't work out 😉
 
AAAHHHHH...Optimisim


EMAIL ARTICLE LINK TO ARTICLE PRINT ARTICLE

Article Published: Sunday, June 06, 2004
United expects decision soon

Eyes $1.6 billion loan guarantee

By Greg Griffin
Denver Post Staff Writer





Three men soon will make a decision that could determine the fate of United Airlines and have profound effects on an industry in chronic turmoil.

The Air Transportation Stabilization Board - formed to assist airlines after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks - is thought to be in the final stages of evaluating United's application for a $1.6 billion loan guarantee.

With the guarantee, United officials say, the Chicago-based company will be able to secure $2 billion in bank loans. That will allow it to emerge from bankruptcy protection later this year.

For Denver, United's No. 2 hub, that would mean preservation of 6,100 jobs and continuation of air service at a level not found in most cities this size.

Without government backing, the future of the world's second-largest carrier and the communities it serves is anyone's guess.


Advertisement

"Fifteen years ago it was inconceivable that someone like Pan Am or Eastern could fail, but does anyone remember them now?" said Robert Mann, president of Port Washington, N.Y.-based airline consulting firm R.W. Mann & Co. "It will be interesting to see how this shakes out."

United chief financial officer Jake Brace told The Denver Post last week that the board is in the "evaluative and deliberative process."

The airline recently provided the board with updated information on how it's being affected by escalating fuel prices and growing low-cost competition, Brace said. No more formal meetings are scheduled.

United has said it will spend $750 million more on fuel this year than it anticipated because of near-record oil prices. Also casting doubts on its chances of recovery are fresh concerns about the solvency of Delta Air Lines and of US Airways, which exited bankruptcy last year with a $900 million guarantee.

Brace said United has confidence in its business plan and its ability to repay its loans.

"They did a very thorough and competent due-diligence process," Brace said. But because United officials did not meet directly with the board, only with its staff, he said, "it's very difficult to get any feedback as to what are their concerns."

"We think we have put together a good business plan that we've validated with the capital markets," Brace said.

United asked the bankruptcy court on Friday to extend by three months - until Sept. 30 - its deadline for filing a restructuring plan. One reason is that the company is uncertain when the ATSB will make its decision.

The airline also must resolve several issues, including a dispute with unions over retiree benefit payments and ongoing negotiations with a group of debtholders.

On the ATSB are Edward Gramlich, a governor of the Federal Reserve System; Brian Roseboro, an undersecretary with the Department of Treasury; and Jeffrey Shane, an undersecretary with the Department of Transportation.

David Walker, comptroller general of the U.S. General Accounting Office, is a non-voting member.

A spokeswoman for the board didn't return a call Friday.

Michael Kestenbaum, executive director of the board, told lawmakers Thursday the federal government owns stakes equivalent to $100 million in six airlines that received loan guarantees totaling $1.8 billion.

The ATSB is authorized to grant up to $10 billion in loan guarantees.

"Currently, all five of the outstanding ATSB guaranteed loans are performing," he said. But at the same time, he acknowledged that "there is always a risk of eventual defaults (on loans) given the challenges the industry continues to face."

The importance of the board's decision goes well beyond United. If the airline is allowed to liquidate or dramatically slash its operations - possible scenarios should the loan guarantee be rejected - the industry's seating capacity would be significantly reduced.

Airline officials say there still are too many seats on the market. That's inhibiting their ability to raise fares to deal with high fuel and security costs, slowly rebounding demand and fierce low-cost competition.

"Until you get rid of some of the extra capacity - some estimates put it as high as 25 percent - there's never going to be pricing power in the industry," AirTran Airways chairman and chief executive Joe Leonard said Thursday during congressional testimony on financial troubles facing airlines.

"Anything the government does to subsidize inefficiency and discourage competition will fail, both for the airlines and for the taxpayers," he said.

United's rivals are pressing the Bush administration to reject the guarantee. They argue Sept. 11 isn't a major factor anymore and that United is to blame for many of its troubles.

Yet few expect the ATSB to withhold government assistance to United. Because it's an election year, politics are likely to play a role in the decision, probably to United's advantage since jobs are at stake.

"United is probably going to get it," said Mike Boyd, an aviation consultant based in Evergreen. "What choice does this group have? If there's even half a chance United is going to go out of business, they're going to give it to them."

Boyd said he believes United could find exit financing without the loan guarantee.

United officials say, however, there is no more money available from private sources. J.P. Morgan Chase and Citigroup are willing to loan United $2 billion to finance its emergence, if it gets the loan guarantee for $1.6 billion. That would leave only $400 million unprotected should the company default.

The board rejected United's last application in December 2002, pushing the carrier into bankruptcy. At the time, United was criticized for overestimating future revenues and failing to cut costs.

Since then, United has slashed more than $5 billion in annual costs. It also has launched a discount carrier to confront low-cost competitors.
 
Unfortunately if United DOES get the loan...then there really is no true justice.....

See Fly, didn't want you to think I had changed 😀
 
Now don't let Ronin fool any of you. In reality, he's a nice guy! The nicest!! 🙂 Now you know 😉





Now watch him get more negative :lol:
 
http://www.comcast.net/News/BUSINESS//XML/...5b156535d4.html

Are those "fossil fuel" burning cars???? What does a couple billion people owning at least one car do to the oil market???

But at least they'll get good paying union jobs....oops, sorry forgot, that's why GM is going there. Anybody read Asian Economics up in first class on the lumps...some real interesting reading on the labor market overthere. God bless this country, it's politicians, corporations, unions and well....just the big ol' melting pot...just gives me goose pimples all over 😀
 
mweiss said:
You use the example of fewer than a dozen people to make summary judgement of millions? :down:
MWeiss, my assessment is based on more than a decade of experience in multiple countries in the Middle East. It is more than just a couple dozen people.
My total time in the region, if counted continuously, is more than two years. I have had a great deal of contact with muslims from all walks of society.
 
Reuters
UPDATE - US proposes fining UAL, affiliate over maintenance
Monday June 7, 7:47 pm ET


(Adds United comment)
WASHINGTON, June 7 (Reuters) - U.S. aviation regulators proposed a $2.5 million fine on Monday against United Airlines (OTC BB:UALAQ.OB - News) and its Atlantic Coast Airlines (NasdaqNM:ACAI - News) affiliate for allegedly failing to follow proper maintenance procedures.

ADVERTISEMENT


The FAA proposed a $1.5 million fine against Atlantic Coast for allegedly operating several planes without performing mandatory inspections of engines and other components. The carrier also failed to keep proper records, the government said.

The carriers have 30 days to appeal the proposed fines.

Atlantic Coast has severed its ties with United and will begin flying as Independence Air out of Washington Dulles airport later this month.

Atlantic Coast has taken new steps to comply with maintenance, inspection and record keeping requirements, the FAA said.

Regulators also proposed a $1 million fine against bankrupt United for allegedly operating a Boeing (NYSE:BA - News) 777 aircraft on roughly 260 flights when it was not in compliance with regulations.

The FAA alleges the emergency escape slides were unusable on those flights, based on a ramp check of the aircraft by government inspectors in Denver in November 2001.

United said it quickly fixed the problem once it was discovered and worked with Boeing to ensure that it did not reoccur.

"We are disappointed that the amount of the fine is so significant since United immediately took corrective action," said Chris Nardella, an airline spokeswoman.

Nardella said the carrier had not decided whether to appeal.

A spokesman for Atlantic Coast could not be immediately reached for comment.

American Airlines (NYSE:AMR - News) and two of its affiliates agreed last week to pay $2.5 million to settle FAA allegations its violated maintenance and other regulations.
 
Ouch....that hurts. Say...those aren't the slides that were outsourced to a company that didn't have FAA certification, was it? You know, we just save and save where we can and I bet not one management person was ever questioned on this. Hmmm, Hmmm what a company. :lol:
 
out·sourc·ing ( P ) Pronunciation Key (outsôrsng, -sr-)
n.
The procuring of services or products, such as the parts used in manufacturing a motor vehicle, from an outside supplier or manufacturer in order to cut costs.

- OR-

The ability to save management positions and pilot wage rates.
 
The Ronin said:
The ability to save management positions and pilot wage rates.
Ronin, EVERYONE has taken pay cuts. As for the pilots, most have taken a 29% pay cut along with a bunch of work rule changes which lower pilots' overall compensation package. Myself and 2171 other UAL pilots have taken 100% wage cuts. Management's taken pay cuts and laid off personnel.
Are you really that stupid or just blinded by hatred to all management and pilots?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top