I choose to participate because some people choose to intentionally manipulate what I say in order to try to defame me.
I haven't seen you or others sit back when people have defamed you, let alone the organizations you are loyal to - and I wouldn't expect you to.
I have repeatedly said that I want a site where people can openly discuss business issues - my preference for discussion topics - without turning the conversations into personal pi87ing matches. and yet repeatedly when real data is presented, far too many people here turn the conversations into attacks on other people instead of admitting that perhaps someone else might be right and might have the information and knowledge to present that data.
I make the choice to stay as involved on this forum as I do to ensure that it either is a place where the honest and objective interchange of ideas takes place or else I will be well in the thick of it all making sure that my point is made.
You and others who say you want that environment and want less of my participation would do well to help create an environment where facts and non-personal attacks are the norm and those who choose to attack others esp. when they bring facts that they don't like are solidly called out. If I had a nickel for every time I have been caller a liar or my user name has been manipulated and it has left unchanged by the moderators, I would be a very rich man. I shouldn't have to be constantly pushing the report button to create a climate that the board should have and moderators should AUTOMATICALLY ESTABLISH every time they participate in the forum in any capacity.
There are a number of bright and articulate people on this forum including you and FWAAA who generally stay further away from the personal attacks than others and who make the forum enjoyable.
and to FWAAA's point, BKK is a top O&D for AA's LAX-NRT flight (although it is low-yielding traffic) and does connect well via HND but there are still about 20% of AA's traffic that does not connect over HND based on an 11pm ish arrival.
and if AA really uses a 787, it is a smaller aircraft than even the current configuration 777s so all of the connections aren't necessary - but AA has to get its share of high value local HND traffic who are willing to pay for taxis or use personal cars based on the arrival time of the flight and the limited public transportation options. A big part of the reason why the HND slots are not attractive is because many people do not want to arrive close to midnight esp. if they live some distance from the airport.
and while some business travelers pay for the close-in convenience of HND - DL's average fare on LAX-HND is higher than LAX-NRT - there are some coach passengers who will be lost and the pool of business travelers does not grow near as fast as the pool of additional coach passengers that AA will have to tap in order to make this route work.
AA is by definition adding more than 20% more seats to the HND market by taking a route that DL did not operate for a number of months of the year.
and HND will always be subject to price competition from NRT where the weaker yen is causing NRT fares to fall. So, AA could well push traffic onto its own new HND flight - but at the expense of AA/JL flights from NRT.
btw, this topic is about DL and LAX-LHR. Other than MAH's glee in posting DL's withdrawal from the market on its own metal, there is no reason to keep this topic open, esp. since half or more of the posts regarding AA's HND and NRT service MUST INVOLVE its JV partner JL. The same type of JV arrangement that will make or break AA's LAX-HND flight is the exact same type of arrangement that is being used by DL in LAX-LHR on VS metal as well as MSP, SEA, and PHL to LHR where there is no VS metal.