LGA/037,
Delta is weaker because it spent an enormous amount of energy on the merger, spent a lot of money fighting off US Airways, and promised the creditors more money on their investment follwoing emergence. The POR and Disclosure Statement has a lot of holes in it, with one, the amount of money being paid to senior management in equity-based compensation. I wonder how the rank-and-file employees will feel when that is announced?
How much did it cost? I do not know, but in his State of the Airline webcast with US Airways employees last Tuesday Doug Parker indicated it was a "significant" number much less than nwhat US Airways spent.
In regard to an unbalanced route network, I would be careful about having too many widebody aircraft or international flying when the next industry "shock event" event occurs and peopel refuse to fly out of the continental U.S.
In the end, I believe a profitable company is the best defense against "shock" events and it provides the best job security and pay, which is whyy I believe the proposed US Airways - Delta merger should have proceeded.
Now that it is over, I believe US Airways should contact Northwest about merging while the Eagain-based company is still in it formal reorganization. If the parties can come to an amicable agreement then I think the new business enterpirse could become a powerhouse.
If the two companies merge, they would have an enormous cost benefit over AA, UA, DL, & CO, who would have no option but to merge to try to close the gap on US/NW, but they would do it without the flexibility of one company being in bankruptcy. Personally, I believe this whole thing with Delta could place US Airways in an enviable position with Delta becoming the weakest legacy carrier.
Regards,
USA320Pilot