Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You still don't get it? This isn't about the votes. Or the money. It's about running the electoral clock out on Dec. 19th.on those four States. To prevent Trump from the 270 electorial votes needed to get him to the Presidency.
Well, desperate times call for desperate measures. And Hillary is a desperate women. If..... Trump don't have the 270 needed. the decision goes to the House of Representatives where Hillary does have a chance, although small, but right now she has none.Good luck with that...
It's all just another attempt to de-legitimize the election results.
Monday you make up numbers about dead registered voters, Tuesday you blame some one else for questioning results.
Watching TV is for the couchbound.E, it didn't come from MSNBC so he doesn't believe, but then he believed them gushing how HRC would win.....lmao
Watching TV is for the couchbound.
Trump still claims the election was rigged.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-donald-trump-recount-20161127-story.html
Hillary has a much chance of winning after the recount as the USA does about seeing Trump's financial obligations and conflicts of interest.
The Democrats’ real strategy in launching recounts
The recount in Wisconsin, and the coming ones in Michigan and Pennsylvania will not change the outcomes in any of the states. No recount ever changes thousands of votes. I do not think that is the purpose.
The recounts, if done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters. If all 3 states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232. No one hits 270.
Then this goes to Congress, where the House voting 1 vote per state elects Trump, and Senate selects Pence. This would be first time Pthis happened since 1824, but in that case, John Quincy Adams won in the House, though he had fewer electoral college votes than Andrew Jackson.
If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it? The answer is to make Trump seem even more illegitimate, that he did not win the popular vote (he lost by over 2.1 million), he did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270), and was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress.