AMFA NWA strike, what really happened.....

  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #31
Northwest Mechanics Strike Against Deep Pay/Benefit Cuts, Layoffs, Outsourcing

Monday 29 August 2005, by Joshua DeVries, William Johnson

Close to 4,400 mechanics, cleaners, and maintenance workers at Northwest Airlines (NWA) walked off the job August 20. The strike, called by the independent Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association (AMFA), is the first major airline strike since Northwest pilots struck in 1998.

The strike represents the labor movement’s first test since the recent AFL-CIO split and, so far, it seems that leaders on both sides of the split are failing spectacularly, refusing to pledge support to the strikers and even encouraging union members to cross the lines. Despite these failures, support has been strong at the local level—particularly at Northwest hubs in Detroit, Minneapolis, and San Francisco.

The strikers are fighting a proposed 25.7 percent pay cut, layoffs for over half the unit’s workforce, reduced sick pay, reduced vacation/holidays, increased health care costs, a pension freeze, and increased outsourcing to non-union shops.
Said Steve MacFarlane, a 25-year NWA mechanic and AMFA assistant national director, “This has ramifications for the entire labor movement. If we can’t fight back under these kinds of circumstances, we’re finished.”
Eric Yubian, a NWA mechanic at New York’s LaGuardia airport, explained that, “The guys believe in what they(re standing for. There might be bad blood between the unions, but this is bigger than that.”

Though AMFA has struggled to get support nationally, strikers have received a good deal of support at the local level. Said Yubian, “union members are supporting us, even if the union does not.”
Yubian noted that members of the Transport Workers Union (TWU), Machinists (IAM), and Teamsters all showed support for the picket lines. “Gate agents (represented by IAM) dropped off food and water to support the lines, and gave us information about flight delays and maintenance problems. Ramp personnel (also IAM) got us information as well.”
Chuck Schalk, an American Airlines mechanic in TWU Local 562 in New York, walked the line at LaGuardia Airport. “A strike is a strike,” he said. “Corporate America is going after unions in this country, and here’s a union standing up and saying, ‘enough is enough.’ If we don’t support them, we’re just as bad as the bosses.”
As in New York, TWU members walked the lines in Dallas and other cities. In Detroit, pickets included among others members of IAM Local 141, UAW Local 600, and Southeast Michigan Jobs with Justice.

Though pickets were spirited and NWA had to cancel 25 percent of its flights on the strike’s first day, AMFA faces an uphill fight.
Since the post-9/11 airline industry meltdown, airline unions have faced a relentless management assault on their wages, benefits, and pensions. Under the gun of bankruptcy threats, in an increasingly hostile political climate, union after union in the industry has surrendered, taking massive concessions with little talk of fighting back.
“Nine months of negotiations and [NWA management’s] offer hasn’t changed a dime,” said MacFarlane. “I mean, how low can we go here?”.
"Keeping jobs is the biggest issue," explained MacFarlane. "They want to eliminate 2,000 jobs, and they want to be able to subcontract almost all of our work. If Northwest was offering a guarantee that our guys would have a future, we’d probably be able to find a middle ground."
The job cuts and outsourcing are part of a new business model that NWA wants to use, one that emulates low-cost, non-union airlines like JetBlue. Under this model, airlines outsource most of their aircraft maintenance to non-union contractors.
According to Yubian, “it’s union busting 101. They want to make Northwest an open shop. If they force this on us, you can bet the rest of the airlines will follow.”

Despite AMFA’s pre-strike calls for solidarity, neither the AFL-CIO nor Change to Win nor other independent unions at Northwest have committed to sympathy strikes or other support.
Questioned about AMFA’s requests for support, AFL-CIO Organizing Director Stewart Acuff attacked the union shortly before the strike as a “renegade, raiding organization” and said AMFA and its more than 10,000 members are “not in the house of labor.”
The Machinists union, which represents gate agents and other ground crew workers at Northwest Air, holds a grudge against AMFA, which has gained most of its members by decertifying IAM units. Northwest mechanics and cleaners left the IAM for AMFA in 1997.
IAM Vice President Robert Roach has said that “IAM members will not be duped into standing with AMFA.”
Members of the Professional Flight Attendants Association. PFAA has stated that it will defend the right of individual workers to not cross, however.
Teamsters spokespeople stated that, “members are free to honor the picket lines, depending on individual locals’ contract language. We’re respecting the Northwest workers, but this is not necessarily a show of support for AMFA.
Schalk called the IAM’s statements “very disturbing,” saying that, “these labor leaders are acting like children. When workers are striking, you don’t cross the lines. We shouldn’t have to remind people about that.”
Some IAM members have not only been crossing the lines, but also reportedly taking on AMFA members’ work. “To cross a picket line is bad enough,” said Yubian, “but crossing a picket line to do struck work—you shouldn’t even be in a union.”
In an open letter of support for the strikers, Trent Willis, president of International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local 10 in San Francisco, made reference to labor’s devastating defeat in the 1981 air traffic controllers strike.
“Have they learned nothing from the devastating defeat of the PATCO strike 24
years ago?” asked Willis. “In 1981, officers of the Professional Air Traffic Controllers’ union (PATCO) were hauled off to jail in handcuffs at the urging of President Reagan. Unions at airports crossed the PATCO picket lines...The tragic result: a union in a key transport industry was broken and all workers have suffered from that defeat since.”
Unlike with PATCO, President George W. Bush has said he will not intervene at Northwest. A White House spokesperson stated they do not view the strike as presenting “a substantial disruption of interstate commerce.”

Northwest has stated repeatedly that if AMFA refuses concessions, bankruptcy may be unavoidable. However, it appears that, with or without concessions, NWA—which has been running $3.6 billion in operating losses since 2001— is headed for bankruptcy.
MacFarlane said that bankruptcy might not be the worst option. “We don’t think a bankruptcy judge would be any worse than what Northwest is trying to push. In bankruptcy court, Northwest would have to prove that they need all these givebacks and, frankly, I’m not sure if they can do it.”
Steenland and Co were hellbent on busting AMFA before the "splinter union"(words from our pals at the IAM) got a foothold. God forbid, the industry can't have a mechanics craft union negotiating with management to get there just due.
The IAM dispises AMFA for a couple of reasons that most on this board already know.........................
1. they shoved the IAM out the door at NWA & 2. AMFA isn't a member of the socialists group known as the AFL-CIO and subsequently doesn't walk in lockstep with the Democratic drum beaters. As if being a craft union or group representing AMTs in this industry is some big sacrilege and unpardonable sin.
Only with the cultist groups I suppose it is.......

I also believe there is/was an industry wide desire to neuter AMFA. If there's one thing management in this business doesn't's to see all the mechanic groups elect AMFA as they're representation. You can bet on that! And don't give me the outsourcing thing....Mgt in this business are going to get there business model where they want it one way or another.
Like Bob says....I'd rather have a good paying job to come back to after I'm furloughed-if I am.'s to see an engaged/unified/militant workforce...

You don't have to be militant, the membership just needs to united, as well as participate in votes. Militant will get you no where with any company. Both sides must be willing to nego back and forth. If you always play militant then you get what the teamsters got in our integration nego's. Not militant---united. Very simple.
Did you miss where I wrote "unified?"

And while militant certainly doesn't need to imply bringing a (proverbial or literal) bat to the table, it absolutely means figuring what's important to the group amd sticking to-and with- that. Would you not agree? based on what you've been writing, I would think we're on the same page.

We don't see that a lot in organized labor today, and the result is that we're easy to pick off...
Did you miss where I wrote "unified?"

And while militant certainly doesn't need to imply bringing a (proverbial or literal) bat to the table, it absolutely means figuring what's important to the group amd sticking to-and with- that. Would you not agree? based on what you've been writing, I would think we're on the same page.

We don't see that a lot in organized labor today, and the result is that we're easy to pick off...

I agree, militancy is a frame of mind and we need that. We are not going to get there when we are able to say, the membership wants this and the union wants that.

Why the two seperate entities? Is it because we cannot hold "the union" accountable (as in recall rights)? Is it because we have no idea what "the union" is disscusing, planning, and or conjuring up, behind closed doors?

Latest posts