Do some research, you like to read.
Election year 2020
- Thread starter Insp4
- Start date
KCFlyer
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2002
- Messages
- 11,581
- Reaction score
- 1,455
You're talking about the kidnappers. This as a different group of kinder, gentler "stop the steal" protesters.
https://www.npr.org/2020/12/07/9439...an-armed-group-protested-in-front-of-her-hous
robbedagain
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2003
- Messages
- 11,125
- Reaction score
- 2,676
Allegedly. what happened to innocent until proven guilty? willing to forfeit that right too?
Dog Wonder
Veteran
Those kind of things are OK if O’Keefe does them. Won’t see law enforcement busting down his door with guns drawn.
Search warrant spelled it out. She breaks the law, she gets charged like any other perp.
KCFlyer
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2002
- Messages
- 11,581
- Reaction score
- 1,455
In your dreams. One thing that is often overlooked in these..."THIS will win us the election" posts is this. For the Supreme Court to hear something, they have to hear something that is called "evidence". There have been 35 lawsuits thrown out from the states in question...so one has to wonder, what evidence does Texas have that the other cases didn't? Because "this election was full of fraud" isn't really evidence. So it will be dismissed.
Insp4
Veteran
- Joined
- May 27, 2016
- Messages
- 6,082
- Reaction score
- 902
Once again KC, you have your head up your tailpipe! What makes this suit different is that it's not about "fraud"!
robbedagain
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2003
- Messages
- 11,125
- Reaction score
- 2,676
I sure as heck would not be betting on the SCOTUS giving TX what they want given that EACH STATE SETS their own rules and laws regarding election.. 2nd The TX AG himself is already under federal probe for violations 3rd The SCOTUS has pretty much indicated that they do not want to get involved particularly given that the states and in some cases the state supreme courts have already ruled against trump and his comedy sitcom batch of idiots.. 4th Even if SCOTUS does actually get involved it is doubtful that theyll even rule in TX favor
Trumplicans sure seem hell bent on having an authortarian style president that trump is Whatever happened to democracy is beyond me.
You republicans sure are "devastated" because of the FACT that mail in ballots were heavily democratic favored given that it happened in the pandemic era
your republicans especially tried their dammest to do voter suppression take TX for example the largest county the TX gov wanted only 1 ballot box for a county of over 1 million REALLLY Now in GA their official wants to reduce or has done so in Cobb County which again reduces the number of ways to vote again in a pandemic that is getting worse by the day given the severe lack of leadership in the WH and on Capitol Hill.
In the case of Florida whereas the woman had her home raided.... REALLY did they absolutely have to go in with guns drawn? Really such an idiotic governor .
until the FACTS come to life no one knows whether or not she truly had what was alleged Also why did the cops NOT take the other electronics THEY ONLY TOOK THE CELLPHONE The judge had just barely a month or so as judge prior he was a lawyer today a REPUBLICAN member on the woman's side resigned over that particular issue bec of how it went down. Clearly per him this was completely retaliation for her coming out with the truth that she says is stark difference to gov with the number of covid cases and deaths..
WTF is matter with the Republican party? I get the fact they want to protect the base that trump has formed but to go this far in the matter that they have is literally like an authortarian country and that is not what America is. Their values are so out of touch
Trumplicans sure seem hell bent on having an authortarian style president that trump is Whatever happened to democracy is beyond me.
You republicans sure are "devastated" because of the FACT that mail in ballots were heavily democratic favored given that it happened in the pandemic era
your republicans especially tried their dammest to do voter suppression take TX for example the largest county the TX gov wanted only 1 ballot box for a county of over 1 million REALLLY Now in GA their official wants to reduce or has done so in Cobb County which again reduces the number of ways to vote again in a pandemic that is getting worse by the day given the severe lack of leadership in the WH and on Capitol Hill.
In the case of Florida whereas the woman had her home raided.... REALLY did they absolutely have to go in with guns drawn? Really such an idiotic governor .
until the FACTS come to life no one knows whether or not she truly had what was alleged Also why did the cops NOT take the other electronics THEY ONLY TOOK THE CELLPHONE The judge had just barely a month or so as judge prior he was a lawyer today a REPUBLICAN member on the woman's side resigned over that particular issue bec of how it went down. Clearly per him this was completely retaliation for her coming out with the truth that she says is stark difference to gov with the number of covid cases and deaths..
WTF is matter with the Republican party? I get the fact they want to protect the base that trump has formed but to go this far in the matter that they have is literally like an authortarian country and that is not what America is. Their values are so out of touch
KCFlyer
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2002
- Messages
- 11,581
- Reaction score
- 1,455
Then what are they suing about? Election rule changes? What evidence (there's that word again) do they have that can prove that the changes were either illegal or fraudulent? What exactly is the attorney general of Texas going to argue?
Insp4
Veteran
- Joined
- May 27, 2016
- Messages
- 6,082
- Reaction score
- 902
Frankly Kc, you don't know what you are tailing about! Do a little homework and look into the case! That will tell you what Texas is saying is these States did not abide by the U.S Constitution, and that by doing so adversely effected their election. Oh, and may I add that more States are considering joining in on the suit! Now rob thinks he has it figured out, but as i replied to him, we'll have to wait and see!
Last edited:
KCFlyer
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2002
- Messages
- 11,581
- Reaction score
- 1,455
We will. But back in 1966 Delaware sued New York over the "winner take all" electoral votes. The court didn't hear the case, but what is interesting is that it was cited as part of this:
Original jurisdiction is limited and manifestly to be sparingly exercised, and should not be expanded by construction. Exercise of its original jurisdiction is not obligatory on the Court but discretionary, to be determined on a case-by-case basis on grounds of practical necessity. It is to be honored only in appropriate cases. And the question of what is appropriate concerns of course the seriousness and dignity of the claim; yet beyond that it necessarily involves the availability of another forum where there is jurisdiction over the named parties, where the issues tendered may be litigated, and where appropriate relief may be had. We incline to a sparing use of our original jurisdiction so that our increasing duties with the appellate docket will not suffer.
Basically they are saying (or will say) to Texas - don't waste our time.
And FWIW, a similar request was made by Mike Kelly of Pennsylvania to overturn the PA election results. Righties were juming with joy when it was presented to justice Alito. Here is the results of that case https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/120820zr_bq7d.pdf
Similar threads
