What's new

FA TA voted down

Go away PIT BULL.............you left a long time ago......get on with your life. This doesn't affect you one little bit..............MOVE ON!!!

Another management cronie sent by Parker..

I'm here to stay, pal!!!!! :angry2:
 
Yes, and what we can do and continue to do is use her opinions to line the bottom of our bird cages with. Too bad for the birds, I think they can do so much better.

I'd like you now to consider what I propose thusly -

First, those oft evily painted and frequent victims of character assassination, Mike and Carol, were ousted so that others could then step in and show us all how a real contract negotiation is done. Remember that?

The others stepped in- CC, et al and trashed the original contract ...but went ahead and promised a newer, better 2nd contract. Remember all that too?

Next, and skipping ahead for attention spans sake, a 2nd TA was produced that was largely the same as the 1st. What I want you to remember is that this 2nd TA which was basically the same as the first with more money was wholey supported by the entire AFA Council. We all received emails and watched kindof corney infomercial styled videos stating the importance of a yes vote. There were also many emphatic statements stating the solidarity of the AFA Council made during this process.

Remember this?

Now, the tricky part...Pitbull as you would argue, with her much valued opines (lol) blubbers on and on about how CC supported the needs of her base by way of the huge CLT fail, but herein lays the problem. "CC" publicly stated her support for the 2nd TA. So if the base rejected the 2nd TA and "CC" supported the 2nd TA then it isn't an unreasonable question to ask: "what is "CC" still doing there as CLT Pres?" This does in fact lend credence to the jokes about the CLT membership being a bunch of idiots. How does Pitbull draw the conclusion that CC was supporting and protecting a base by a landslide fail when the "outcome" was the exact opposite of what CC publicly stated that she wanted?

The videos and emails stated that all base Presidents were onboard with the 2nd TA.

Remember this?

So Skyhigh who exactly is the "CC" Pitbull is writing about? Remember AFA was working "IN UNITY" and still puts forth emails stating as much. You just posted one earlier this evening.

Maybe Pitbull just missed out on what happened over the last few months...which begs the answer ~ this might be why so many don't care for her "opinions".

Of interest is that should we fas go out on strike at some point all the cries of poverty from the fas over reduced pay etc will land firmly and exactly where they belong- at CC's feet.

I am so very glad you like to read opinions...I do have a few on this particular topic.

I didn't miss anything....the T/A 2 FAILED AGAIN...probably because you have plenty of PIT f/as based in CLT. NONETHELESS, Cathy is representing her f/as well. There are only 3 bases on the EAST...that means 3 presidents voted to bring the t/a out for a vote. The MEC has an obligation to give the f/as an opportunity to say nay or yea for their future. I am sure that if they didn't bring out the t/a, you would be on here spouting off how the MEC DENIED their members a chance to vote...and this is CC fault, blah, blah, blah crap again.
Well, you got the chance, and it failed.

THEIR voices have been heard loud and clear by the leadership and the mangement!
That leads the union to the next course of action....vote on a strike. I think the f/as showed unity, courage, strength by voting the t/a down again, after all, the union is the membership; they are who run the union!!!!

Or did you miss that somewhere?????
 
You and CC are a cancer on the F/A group.

CC needs to go!

YOU (pITTbULL) are responsible for PBS.

Did you ever hear from "leadership"?(CC)

I thought not.

MUTANT!MORONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!MM!
 
Do you have a drinking or substance abuse problem?

If not with each post you make yourself look even more foolish.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top