Dea Certe
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 889
- 0
I thought we were told by thw W&G regime that a big part of US''s problem was too many aircraft types, which led to higher training costs, more expense in keeping parts at hand for all the fleet types, etc.
Now, here''s all this talk about adding more aircraft types. I assume these RJ''s, CRJ''s or whatever will not be flown or maintained by mainline. So, these will go to the W/O''s?
Are any of the W/O''s ALPA? I think some of the f/a''s are AFA represented.
I don''t know, but this is starting to seem like a gnarly hairball. Can someone explain this to me? I''ll admit I am probably suffering from Skyheimers, better know as Old Flyers Disease.
Thanks in advance for any explanation this ancient sky hag can comprehend.
Dea
Now, here''s all this talk about adding more aircraft types. I assume these RJ''s, CRJ''s or whatever will not be flown or maintained by mainline. So, these will go to the W/O''s?
Are any of the W/O''s ALPA? I think some of the f/a''s are AFA represented.
I don''t know, but this is starting to seem like a gnarly hairball. Can someone explain this to me? I''ll admit I am probably suffering from Skyheimers, better know as Old Flyers Disease.
Thanks in advance for any explanation this ancient sky hag can comprehend.
Dea