Gay Marriage

[xUT]

No twist at all. Perversion is a POV. Some used to find interracial marriage a perversion. Some religions find that sex for pleasure is a perversion. Some feel that a 40 yr old man married to a 20 yr old woman is a perversion (my sister and brother in law have been married for over 30 years). What you find perverse is not a legal argument and does not matter in the least.


This argument is solely about equal rights. The right of two (or more) adults to enter in to a binding contract. You may laugh all you want but you have yet to provide a legal argument against equal marriage. I do practice what I preach. I do my best to separate my personal feelings from my positions on peoples rights.


No idea what you are ranting on about in the rest of your post. Bottom line is if you have a compelling legal argument go for it, other wise it really does not matter.

Well, that's the argument. You perceive that perversion is a 'point of view'.
You will never convince me that homosexuality is not perverse as is bestiality, nambla, child molesters, or any other of your 'point of views'.
Your race argument/excuse is not the same as deviancy. Never was, never will be.
But keep playing it up as most of society believes this bull ####.
B) xUT

 

[SparrowHawk]

However as long as one "Perversions" don't infringe upon the rights of others then they are IMO permissable under the COTUS.

Liberty is about living life on your terms. Same as if you were a member of Serpent Handling congregation. Nobody's business what you do.

 

[delldude]

Yo Knucklehead.
You can 'crack on me ALL day long,....I find it comical.
BUT,
Truth be told,.....for whatever reason, you NEVER mention a Spouse, gal-pal, a date etc, but appear to be a sex expert, which then has me pondering if you 'may' be a ..Pickle Smoocher, perhaps a Voyeur or possess an assortment of Blow-up Dolls ! ?????????????????????

Dude, you got class....Best change your ways or you'll find yourself in a pickle.

 

[delldude]

Hey Bears,
Here you are on a gay thread calling somebody a pickle smoocher... LOL
You know that's what got me banned... 😛
B) xUT

Klaussen 'er what?

 

[Ms Tree]

Well, that's the argument. You perceive that perversion is a 'point of view'.
You will never convince me that homosexuality is not perverse as is bestiality, nambla, child molesters, or any other of your 'point of views'.
Your race argument/excuse is not the same as deviancy. Never was, never will be.
But keep playing it up as most of society believes this bull ####.
B) xUT

Fine. You can consider what ever you want as a perversion. I could care less. Just don't start passing laws prohibiting things you find offensive with no legal argument to support it and think that this slippery slope cannot come back and bite you in the ass.

Perhaps someone down line will think Christianity is a perversion and ban that. Extreme example but you get the point.

If you have a legal argument against homosexuality legs hear what you have. Southwind obviously does not.

 

[NewHampshire Black Bears]

So you are saying "NO" gay couple wants to get hitched , simply because of the benefits of said hitching ?
Your are the naive and stupid one, in this discussion, if you believe that!
Again, don't like what you see or hear.............Ignore !


1. I don't believe in bringing my wife into any of the discussions here, as it's non-relavent and she is not here to voice her opinion on any of these discussions !
2. Sounds to me like your "Cruisin"...............Dolt !

OK southwind, thanx for clearing things up,that UR married. (Not that you had to prove anything to anyone) (My BAD) !!!

 

[delldude]

OK southwind, thanx for clearing things up,that UR married. (Not that you had to prove anything to anyone) (My BAD) !!!

Was it important to your narrative?

 

[Dog Wonder]

OK southwind, thanx for clearing things up,that UR married. (Not that you had to prove anything to anyone) (My BAD) !!!

Wanna buy the Brooklyn Bridge.

 

[RDU Jetblast]

Well, that's the argument. You perceive that perversion is a 'point of view'.
You will never convince me that homosexuality is not perverse as is bestiality, nambla, child molesters, or any other of your 'point of views'.
Your race argument/excuse is not the same as deviancy. Never was, never will be.
But keep playing it up as most of society believes this bull ####.
B) xUT

How do you explain homosexuality as a perversion if it A) goes back to the dawn of time and B) there is evidence that animals swing both ways? C) there is genuine love involved D) and you get turn on watching two women have sex? C'mon, we know you do so dont lie about it

 

[delldude]

OK southwind, thanx for clearing things up,that UR married. (Not that you had to prove anything to anyone) (My BAD) !!!

Not that you had to prove anything?

Why then do you, Dog Wonder and Quagmire keep resorting to slandering the man if it wasn't so important to you and your friends?

 

[southwind]

Not a problem Dell. Just means I'm pushing the right buttons !

 

[delldude]

Not a problem Dell. Just means I'm pushing the right buttons !

Yeah, guess it shows their true political party affiliation.

 

[Dog Wonder]

Not that you had to prove anything?

Why then do you, Dog Wonder and Quagmire keep resorting to slandering the man if it wasn't so important to you and your friends?

Pointing and laughing is slander?

 

[Kev3188]

Still waiting to hear a legitimate reason why 2 people who are in love shouldn't be allowed to marry. The world's a wild place; anytime fate conspires to bring two people together, it should be celebrated, not condemned...

 

[Ms Tree]

I do not believe there is one and that is why when these laws finally hit the SCOTUS i think they will fail.