What's new

George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin

It has everything to do with it. Read 776.013 dip chit.
You best stick with subjects you're familiar with like gay and women's rights. You have no basic understanding of gun control or self defense laws what-so-ever!
 
What law(s) struck down or invalidate .013?
The crime didn't happen in their "castle" where there is NO DUTY TO RETREAT.

776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.
 
The crime didn't happen in their "castle" where there is NO DUTY TO RETREAT.

776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.

Suddenly its Google City at the Treehouse.....
taz.gif
 
What law(s) struck down or invalidate .013?

Knotbuyinit, on 25 June 2013 - 01:39 PM, said:
The crime didn't happen in their "castle" where there is NO DUTY TO RETREAT.

776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.


Captain Duh strikes again.............

DavisJim-Garfield-16-Duh-sj.jpg
 
Did Zimmerman and Martin have a DUTY TO RETREAT?

I know that. .013 does not deal with defense of home. It deals with actions in public and deletes the duty to retreat that is normally present when one is in public.
 
I know that. .013 does not deal with defense of home. It deals with actions in public and deletes the duty to retreat that is normally present when one is in public.
And that must be why it's titled "Home Protection". It deals with defense IN HOME!

So, answer the question, were Zimmerman or Martin in their home/s when Martin was killed?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top