What's new

George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin

So , since Zimmerman wasn't placed in custody, wasn't arrested and he isn't out on bail and was only questioned means he will "Never" be accused of committing a crime , in this case......right ?

In six months, when a non-full scale investigation had finished up, if it had been given the chance, there's no way in hell Zimmerman would have been accused of a crime being committed !

This is an excuse for a certain group of people to ask for blood, no matter who's blood it is !

And no, I'm not saying this case should not be investigated but, do Police "ALWAYS" make an immediate arrest in every case they're investigating ?..........didn't think so !

Reading the state law that is an easy assumption to arrive at. As far as we know there may be one witness. We do not know what was seen by this person. In 2010 there were over 100,000 violent crimes, 600,000 property crimes, 1,000 murders, 5,000 rapes, 26,000 robberies, 70,000 aggravated assaults, 170,000 burglaries, 450,000 larceny thefts and over 400,000 car thefts. You think they have 6 months to spend on one murder? All indications are that this case was wrapped up until it hit the news. Do you have a source that says other wise? Then there is the fact that justifiable homicides have tripled in FL since the enactment of the stand your ground law. So I think the evidence is against your assertion that he would have been arrested.

If you are referring to the Panthers I agree 100%. What they did should be illegal. I understand rewards for finding information to help find a lost person or information to convict a person but what the Panthers did is abhorrent. They are essentially asking for a vigilante mob.

Not sure about the always part. In FL obviously not and that seems to be in large part due to the stand your ground law. This is a case where there were no witnesses, one person was dead the other was claiming defense. At least one officer at the time said this does not match up and wanted an arrest warrant for Zimmerman. There was no evidence, witness or other wise to say that Zimmerman was in the clear. At the vey least he should have been detained. I believe he should have been arrested and allowed to post bail and a GJ should have been convened. There is enough suspicion around the case to indicate that it was not handled properly.
 
Anybody see anything on MSM about the 49 similar shootings with 10 deaths including a 9 year little girl sitting on her porch sprayed with automatic weapons fire on the very same day in Chicago?

Wonder why?
 
Reading the state law that is an easy assumption to arrive at. As far as we know there may be one witness. We do not know what was seen by this person. In 2010 there were over 100,000 violent crimes, 600,000 property crimes, 1,000 murders, 5,000 rapes, 26,000 robberies, 70,000 aggravated assaults, 170,000 burglaries, 450,000 larceny thefts and over 400,000 car thefts. You think they have 6 months to spend on one murder? All indications are that this case was wrapped up until it hit the news. Do you have a source that says other wise? Then there is the fact that justifiable homicides have tripled in FL since the enactment of the stand your ground law. So I think the evidence is against your assertion that he would have been arrested.

If you are referring to the Panthers I agree 100%. What they did should be illegal. I understand rewards for finding information to help find a lost person or information to convict a person but what the Panthers did is abhorrent. They are essentially asking for a vigilante mob.

Not sure about the always part. In FL obviously not and that seems to be in large part due to the stand your ground law. This is a case where there were no witnesses, one person was dead the other was claiming defense. At least one officer at the time said this does not match up and wanted an arrest warrant for Zimmerman. There was no evidence, witness or other wise to say that Zimmerman was in the clear. At the vey least he should have been detained. I believe he should have been arrested and allowed to post bail and a GJ should have been convened. There is enough suspicion around the case to indicate that it was not handled properly.

And I say unless there was definitive proof that murder was the crime and not self-defense, Zimmerman should have been detained, not arrested, questioned and told not to leave town !

Is there some proof that Police had closed this case or were they just not working fast enough for a certain group ?
 
I think the bigger issue is the stand your ground law in FL. The law is fatally flawed. If you look at section 3 of the law it essentially says that I can follow someone in a public place and if that person turns on me and I feel threatened I can can use force including deadly force to save my self. Even though I initiated the pursuit, I can still claim that I felt threatened. The fact that justifiable homicides have tripled in FL seems to have skated under the radar on this one.
I’ve never read such gross and blatantly ignorant misinterpretation of Florida’s self-defense laws in my life! Since page 1 you have highjacked this thread with your straw man scenario that resembles nothing remotely close to what Florida’s self defense laws actually say. I laughed when I read “it essentially says” and then references some obscure “section 3” (citation please) reference to back your bloated expert analysis of the Martin / Zimmerman case. You made up this story and have nothing to reference your so-called factual statements.

Before you start running your trap I suggest you study up on “duty to retreat”.

First off, “Stand Your Ground” is totally irreverent to this case. Zimmerman exercised has right under “Fla. Stat. § 776.012. Use of force in defense of person” to use lethal force to save his life.

“A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:

(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony;


Deadly force may only be applied in situations where you feel “imminent death or great bodily harm,” or “the imminent commission of a forcible felony.” The law goes on to state that a person may only use deadly force if he “reasonably believes” that the aforesaid factual conditions exist".

Just as important, notice the reference to “duty to retreat”. These laws are the norm throughout the US and you don't have one once of proof to suggest SYG has raised the homicide rate, not one!

The reason a “full blown” investigation wasn’t started is because the police detectives had determined that Zimmerman acted in self defense. Zimmerman suffered a broken nose, his clothes had grass stains on them and he had a contusion on the back of his head with open, bleeding wounds. As more details have emerged, it appears that Zimmerman was attacked by the 6’2”, 170 lbs Martin.

SYG becomes irreverent once the first physical contact is made regardless to who the aggressor party is. Zimmerman did not have the opportunity to "retreat". Big difference in the application of the self defense laws.

I’ve taken your ignorant straw man assumptions and put them into context with what the Florida self defense laws really have to say.

“Mr. Knot lurks around the public square, spots Ms Tree and, well lurks Ms Tree until Ms Tree becomes suspicious of my lurking. Having had enough, Ms Tree swings around and says “WTF is your problem Mr. Knot, why are you lurking me?” Mr. Knot replies back in a loud and rude rant dishing out insult after insult about Ms Tree, his wife(?), and his family! Ms Tree gets nervous and feels threatened by Mr. Knot’s insults.

What does Ms Tree do? (remember, we are in public)
.

Ms Tree makes the right call and retreats to a public area where he feels more secure, then calls the police to report the suspicious activity.

In this case, Ms Tree had and took the opportunity to “retreat”.

The issue of “Retreat” under Fla. Stat. § 776.013:

A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony”.

Now, let’s back up a minute and change the response from Mr. Knot.

Ms. Tree swings around and says “WTF is your problem Mr. Knot, why are you lurking me? Mr. Knot responds by throwing a hard right punch in Ms. Tree’s nose, breaking his nose and takes him to his knees. Mr. Knot continues the assault and drags a dazed and confused Ms Tree to the sidewalk. Mr. Knot continues the assault by sitting on top of him and slamming his head repeatedly against the sidewalk".

Still conscious and fearing for his life, what does Ms Tree do?

Ms Tree makes the right call and pulls his concealed weapon and fires a single lethal round in to Mr. Knot’s chest.

In this case, Ms Tree did not have the opportunity to “retreat” because he had been attacked by Mr. Knot! Reference “The issue of “Retreat” under Fla. Stat. § 776.013:” The laws change when the physical assault begins no matter who the aggressor is!

It does seem clear that Zimmerman was following Martin even though 911 dispatch said not too. If I were being followed by someone at night I am not sure what I would do.

Zimmerman did not call 911. He called a non-emergency dispatcher who does not have the authority to issue a lawful command and Zimmerman was under no legal obligation to follow her order. . period. Zimmerman was asked by the dispatcher if he was following Martin, Zimmerman replied in the affirmative.Zimmerman was told by the dispatcher “you don’t need to do that” to which Zimmerman responded “OK’. Your assertion that Martin was following Zimmerman is a fabrication. The fact that you wouldn’t know what to do in a situation with similar circumstances speaks volumes about your knowledge of the law. But again, I already knew that!

Look at what Zimmerman did under the circumstances as opposed to what Martin did. Martin had every opportunity to call the police if he felt threatened just as Zimmerman did, he elected to call his girlfriend instead. You’re here to tell me Martin did all this while being hotly pursued by Zimmerman?

If you read the law, the police had no reason to arrest much less detain Zimmerman. A kid gets shot and the shooter is not even out on bail? WTF??? The law either needs to be struck down or modified. I do not see how someone can pursue an individual and then claim to be threatened by the individual.

Martin did not claim to be threatened by Zimmerman! He did not call the police to report the threat nor did he run the 100 yards to his father’s house where he would have been secure from a perceived threat, a duty to retreat.

Since you have gone out of your way to create a scenario to fit your narrative, let me field a very possible scenario based on what has been reported.

You can be sure that law enforcement has subpoenaed the cell phone records of both Zimmerman and Martin to determine through cell tower triangulation and enabled GPS to determine their relative positions to each other.

My theory goes something like this;

Weather conditions at the time were reported as heavy rain. It is more than likely that Zimmerman spotted and observed Martin while driving his SUV through the gated community he patrolled. It is not likely that Zimmerman would be patrolling outside his vehicle in the rain. It is unclear if Zimmerman stopped his SUV to question Martin from within his SUV (not against the law and well within his legal boundaries) or if Zimmerman just observed Martin and then parked and got out of his SUV to question Martin.

Zimmerman stated that Martin’s suspicious activities included indicators that he may be under the influence of alcohol / drugs and appeared to be casing homes as he slowly walked (it has been reported that Martin had just be suspended from school due to having pot residue in a plastic baggy on school property). In light of this recent disclosure, Zimmerman observations become more relevant as he may in fact have observed Martin stoned to the bone!

At some point immediately after Martin was observed, Zimmerman got out of his SUV and attempted to approach Martin. It is unclear if Zimmerman ever had the opportunity to question Martin as it appears Martin started to run as he watched Zimmerman approach. In the non-emergency call placed by Zimmerman (now public record) he does not sound like a person trying to carry on a conversation while in hot pursuit. He is not winded and there is no indication that he was under any immediate threat of danger. Zimmerman states that he lost sight of Martin for approximately 5 minutes. As noted already, Martin was within 100 yards of his father’s house when he began to run. Why didn't he run home?

Zimmerman stated that he walked back to his SUV (distance unknown) and as he was about to enter his SUV, Martin appeared from his right rear quarter. Zimmerman states that Martin asked him if he "had a problem with him” in which Zimmerman is quoted as saying “no”. According to Zimmerman, Martin replied “well you do now” at which point Martin landed a blow to Zimmerman’s nose. This blow was hard enough to break his nose and understandable take him to his knees. It is at this time at Zimmerman did not have the opportunity to retreat. As the police investigation indicates, it then appears Zimmerman was dragged a short distance across an area of grass (grass stains on his clothes) before being placed on his back on a sidewalk. Martin appears to have sat on top of Zimmerman and slammed his head against the sidewalk (contusions to the back of Zimmerman’s head and open wounds). There was an altercation . . . The fact that Martin's body was discovered so close to the point of the initial contact with Zimmerman suggest that Martin returned to Zimmerman's location. Why?

It was at this time that Zimmerman, dazed and confused, exercised his legal right to use lethal force in order to save his own life! Fortunately for Zimmerman he was carrying a legal concealed weapon.

The more I learn about Martin and his propensity to comment crime, the clearer the picture becomes of what Obama’s son would look like, a loser! I guess the police just acted stupidly huh Ms Tree?

Exit question. Why do you harbor such a racist attitude toward young white Hispanic males?
 
Exit question. Why do you harbor such a racist attitude toward young white Hispanic males?


He's not real fond of Christians either. So why be surprised? Jumping on the Liberal/Progressive band wagon and there "Hey let's lynch the Spic" because we need the Black vote in November approach to the case is the way the Liberal/Progressives operate.

It was never about Justice for Trayvon Martin or George Zimmerman. No search for truth!!! Just a search for votes by all parties. AG Bondi announces a Special Prosecutor! WHY? So somebody/anybody gets convicted to polish her record as a advocate of "All of Florida". Well it turns out the Special Prosecutor herself a Ms Corley IIRC who is up for reelection.

George Zimmerman may or may not be guilty of a crime under FL law. However IMO he'd best have pictures of the AG & Prosecutor engaged in a threesome with the Governor to avoid a guilty plea. Jesse "How Exactly does he earn a living" Jackson, Al "Tawana Brawley" Sharpton, NAACP and their accomplice in the White House have sealed Zimmerman's fate. If he walks on the state charge he'll be free from the time it takes to walk from the courtroom to the nearest FBI agent with an arrest warrant on Federal Civil Rights Law Charges.

This guy is a big thick piece of Pepperidge Farm Toast lightly buttered.
 
Anybody see anything on MSM about the 49 similar shootings with 10 deaths including a 9 year little girl sitting on her porch sprayed with automatic weapons fire on the very same day in Chicago?

Wonder why?

Peckerhead liberals like MSM keep looking the other way. You guys are smooth between the legs.

DON'T FIT THE NARRATIVE FOR THIS ARGUMENT?

BE ASHAMED, VERY ASHAMED.
 
Peckerhead liberals like MSM keep looking the other way. You guys are smooth between the legs.

DON'T FIT THE NARRATIVE FOR THIS ARGUMENT?

BE ASHAMED, VERY ASHAMED.

Damn you're right! I've been trying to figure a way to include Ron Paul so that the troll can demonstrate his superior troll skills. But alas I've failed.

It's going to be IMO a total railroad job. No search for justice
 
Just saw the police station tape of them bringing in ZIM, who claimed to have a BLOODY NOSE, and BLOODY rear of HEAD.
However, ZIM's shaved head is as smooth as a Cue Ball, (no notice of any abrasion), And NO medical attention sought at any medical facility !!!!!!!!!!

Just remember,............Ol' TOMMY said........"this thing can turn on a dime at Any Moment"
 
I’ve never read such gross and blatantly ignorant misinterpretation of Florida’s self-defense laws in my life! Since page 1 you have highjacked this thread with your straw man scenario that resembles nothing remotely close to what Florida’s self defense laws actually say. I laughed when I read “it essentially says” and then references some obscure “section 3” (citation please) reference to back your bloated expert analysis of the Martin / Zimmerman case. You made up this story and have nothing to reference your so-called factual statements.

Before you start running your trap I suggest you study up on “duty to retreat”.

First off, “Stand Your Ground” is totally irreverent to this case. Zimmerman exercised has right under “Fla. Stat. § 776.012. Use of force in defense of person” to use lethal force to save his life.

“A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:.......


According to this site you left an important part. Since you are so smart I'll let you figure it out. I'll give you a hint, it is what the stand your ground law address and is the reason the stand your ground law is being addressed by everyone and not the Castle law (that's another hint by the way).

Here is the portion of the stand your ground law that is pertinent. 776.013
(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

Reported justifiable homicides have increased Self defense stats. The rates have increase but there is valid debate as to why. Direct cause and effect cannot be determined without in depth research. Circumstantial evidence suggests that the law is at least partially to blame.

The only evidence is that there was a confrontation. There is no proof one way or the other who started the fight (if there was one) or why. I have not seen any autopsy info to indicate that Martin had defensive or offensive wounds. Zimmerman had 3 assault charges on him one of which was against a police officer if I remember reading correctly.

Mr Zimmerman acknowledged that he was following Martin. Not sure why you are contesting that. Never said he had any legal obligation to follow dispatches request. The fact that he chose not to and proceeded to follow Zimmerman goes to his intent in my opinion. Hotly pursued? You were there? He was being followed. That is all we know. I do not see it as unlikely that a black kid would be reluctant to call the cops.

When I said I did not know what I would do I meant that in every situation reactions will be different. Never knew what I would do if I was held up at gun point until I was held up at gun point in 1984. In that specific situation I know what I did. No idea what I will do the next time.

Martin is dead. He was being followed. He called his girlfriend. She indicated he was concerned/threatened. The fact that he did not call the cops does not prove anything other than he did not trust the cops. I do not trust them all that much either.

Guess we will never know why he did not go to his dads. house. He can't tell us.

Casing the houses based on what evidence? None. Just observation. Did he peer in any windows? Go in any back yards? Under the influence? Again, based on what? Has there been any blood work done to show he was under the influence? Would Zimmerman have known that? If he was under the influence would he have been casing houses? Looking for munchies may be.

How does it appear that Martin was running? Zimmerman can say what ever he wants. There is no one to contradict him. According to your little fantacy Zimmerman lied to Martin when he said he had no problem. According to you Martin was casing houses and high. make your mind. Pick one and stick with it.

I did not know they had video of Martin landing a punch on Zimmerman's nose.

OH he!!. This is stupid. Your made up fantasy has nothing to do with reality.

Zimmerman was pursing Martin. Martin may or may not have approached Zimmerman. No one knows who threw the first punch. Zimmerman was armed. Zimmerman could just as well have started to reach for his gun and Martin jumped him in self defense.

Next time try getting your facts straight before flapping your gums and leave the fantasy for someone who gives a crap.
 
Your made up fantasy has nothing to do with reality.

Which fantasy is that? Submitted for your consideration.

Suppose George Zimmerman was Black and Mr Martin white as snow would any of us know either name?

Suppose David Duke and others from the KKK came out and questioned the police over the death of Mr Martin?


What then? What if it weren't an election year? Would we have a "Special Prosecutor"? Would she be an "Up & Coming" person with enough clout and blind ambition to rail road virtually everyone or anyone in FL?

Face this fact, The power structure NEEDS a scalp for their belt and Mr Zimmerman happens to be available. Doesn't matter if he was right or wrong. What matters is the Progressives have created an ideal scenario with which to take the public's mind off of $5/gallon gasoline. 9% Unemployment, and the 30% increase in Groceries since the Empty Suit assumed power.

Let the race baiting as shiny metal object continue as it will keep the Golden Retriever attention span of the public focused on minutia while the serious stuff gets ignored. This is all part of the reelection strategy. Obama got a gift early and he's using it at Mr Martin's and Mr Zimmerman's expense. Business as usual in the land where Truth is Treason.
 
This isn't that complicated.

Just another scared white boy who thinks a gun makes him a man.
 
Poor Georgie looked awfully good for a guy having had his nose broken and his head bashed on the sidewalk. He's a hardheaed for sure.
 
Jonah Goldberg

March 29, 2012


"White Hispanic." That's how The New York Times, Reuters and other media outlets have opted to describe George Zimmerman, a man who would simply be Hispanic if he hadn't shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin. The term, rarely if ever used before this tragedy, is necessary in telling the Martin story in a more comfortable way.


Zimmerman may well deserve to go to jail. Or this may just be a confluence of horrible mistakes with no criminal intent whatsoever. That's what a Justice Department probe and a Florida grand jury will determine. But for the forces demanding action, that isn't good enough. Jackson, as is his wont, threatens there will be "no peace" until Zimmerman is arrested.
 
Which fantasy is that? Submitted for your consideration.

Suppose George Zimmerman was Black and Mr Martin white as snow would any of us know either name?

Suppose David Duke and others from the KKK came out and questioned the police over the death of Mr Martin?


What then? What if it weren't an election year? Would we have a "Special Prosecutor"? Would she be an "Up & Coming" person with enough clout and blind ambition to rail road virtually everyone or anyone in FL?

Face this fact, The power structure NEEDS a scalp for their belt and Mr Zimmerman happens to be available. Doesn't matter if he was right or wrong. What matters is the Progressives have created an ideal scenario with which to take the public's mind off of $5/gallon gasoline. 9% Unemployment, and the 30% increase in Groceries since the Empty Suit assumed power.

Let the race baiting as shiny metal object continue as it will keep the Golden Retriever attention span of the public focused on minutia while the serious stuff gets ignored. This is all part of the reelection strategy. Obama got a gift early and he's using it at Mr Martin's and Mr Zimmerman's expense. Business as usual in the land where Truth is Treason.

What does your fantasy have to do with Knobuyinit? How about instead of making scenarios up we look at real life? What would happen if a white girl (Hallaway) got abducted and possibly murdered in the Caribbean? Do you think that would be in the news? Do you think this white girl was the only person murdered in the Caribbean? Were any of the others in the news? And her suspected murderer was not even black. How long was she in the news for? A few years (or at least so it seems). How about a young pageant girl (Ramsey) who was murdered? How long was her name in the news? What about a mother who killed her daughter (Anthony) and it took how many years to convict?

Do you think there are any minorities who were murdered during this time who would have appreciated the coverage to perhaps find their killers? What about a ex-football player who murdered his ex-wife and boy friend? Was the OJ trial because he was black or was it because he was a rich man who tried to buy his way out of jail?

How long do you folks want to play this "whitey is thew victim" BS? Do you want to be a minority in from of the legal system or a caucasian? There tens of thousands of murders in this country every year. Every now and then someone wins the lotto and gets picked up by the news. Out of those someone grabs the attention. There is no rhyme or reason. This case has quite a bit more going on than just race although that does seem to be a mitigating factor.

Please spare me the drama and conspiracy theories. The public just seems to latch on to certain things. You do not seem to want to address the issue that a person who killed another person with no witnesses and at the very least under suspicious circumstances was never arrested much less detained. The decision was made at the time of the murder that there was not sufficient evidence to obtain an arrest warrant. Never mind the fact that an unarmed kid was dead. A few defensive wounds obtained in an unknown manner were all that was needed to exonerate the suspect, excuse me the victim because it seems Mr Zimmerman was thew victim here right?

You really think people are going to obsess over this case and forget that they are paying nearly $5 gallon? I am pretty sure people are able to be concerned about more than one issue.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top