What's new

Good bye patreus

An extramarital affair is cause for pulling a top secret clearance. No top secret clearance, no ability to be told anything....well...top secret, therefore, no ability to be the Director of the CIA.

Say's the Great and Wonderful Quag ! Who knows and see's all !
 
Say's the Great and Wonderful Quag ! Who knows and see's all !
Are you trying to say what I posted is not true?

Have you ever had a clearance? Do you know what it takes?

Let me simplify it for you. A top CIA official with no top secret clearance is like a truck driver with no drivers license.

You might even be able to look it up on commieblaster and post a link for us.

I will help you out a little:

"In fact, anyone applying for a Top Secret for Sensitive Compartmentalized Information (TSSCI) clearance would be denied for simply having any outstanding debt. Something as simple as a DUI or alcohol problem can endanger passing a Secret Clearance review, which is one lower than TSSCI (also referred to as a 'need-to-know').
Petraeus, as the head of the CIA, certainly had the type of Top Secret clearance which allowed him comprehensive access to the most sensitive pieces of National Security information."


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/petraus-opened-himself-to-blackmail-with-his-extra-maritial-affair-2012-11#ixzz2Bp1WGdR5
 
Glenn is correct regarding security clearances.

Sometimes a duck is just a duck. In this case I'm not so sure. Time will tell.
 
Wasn't saying Quag didn't get "THIS ONE" right..............

I'm just questioning the timing of this event, since Patreaus was set to testify before congress next week ?

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck...........!
 
Its not a rumor about Holder, he came out and said he isnt sure if he wants to remain for a second term.
 
Ok...there was a violation of rules, but you don't really believe thats the only rule that was broken do you?

Remember all those drug tests on the military and public that the cia said they never did, but did actally do?

What we are witnessing is a violation of convenience.
 
I doubt it was a violation of convenience. The only convenience was the timing being after the election. Otherwise, it would have cast a longer shadow over the Libya stuff than it has cast on its own.
 
Here are few more questions right wing...nutscases... are asking:

1) What kind of voodoo witch doctor spells did Obama cast over this good Christian General to get him to schtup this woman?

2) Did Obama make him resign because this is a violation of Sharia law?

3) Why didn't Obama send in a black woman to initiate an affair with him? Is Obama a racist?

4) What "stuff" did Obama offer the General to get him to resign?

5) Is that even really Gen Petraeus, or did Obama replace him wtih some kind of new drone that he developed in one of his FEMA concentration camps?

6) How deeply invlolved with Fast and Furious was Gen. Petraeus? How about Solydra? What's he hiding, huh?


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83678.html#ixzz2BsLlzy8e
 
Wow, Politico being unusually shrill? They're Obama supporters. Are they turning on their own?
 
Tweet of the day:

ScreenShot2012-11-12at125337AM.png
 
Say it ain't so... more proof the investigation was going on over the summer, yet nobody bothered to act until the week after the election.

http://hotair.com/archives/2012/11/12/fbi-knew-of-petraeus-broadwell-affair-in-the-summer/
 
I doubt it was a violation of convenience. The only convenience was the timing being after the election. Otherwise, it would have cast a longer shadow over the Libya stuff than it has cast on its own.

Perhaps you should ask Eric Cantor. He was told abut the affair back in October.

I think we need to have an investigation into Canor and find out why he was covering this up.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top