Dog Wonder
Veteran
And if you're NOT voting for Ron Paul it means you agree with the current structure and actions implemented
Is that a parallel to 'If you don't vote for Obama you are a racist"?
And if you're NOT voting for Ron Paul it means you agree with the current structure and actions implemented
Congress (republicans) are not going to vote against a Consumer protection department that they voted for in the first place. They figured that they could vote for the legislation and then sink an appointment the the very department they supported. Now they are faced with going up against the president in an election year and would have to explain to the voters why they do not want to allow a department to have a leader who is supported by both conservatives and liberals. Yea, that will play just great during an election cycle. The republicans did not look a few moves ahead on this one and it would appear that they just got stomped.
And if you're NOT voting for Ron Paul it means you agree with the current structure and actions implemented
Lets put it this way SH, if Ron Paul is the candidate against Obama he will be my candidate.
How did you deduce all of that nonsense above from my observational post? Having a bad night dude?My link
I think you mean running for re-election now that both houses can't forward the progressive agenda that was his steamroller now sucks and he will do a run around on the Constitution.
You know, like "natural born".
He is an ass.......and he is demonstrating why we have/need a separation of powers.
But it sounds like its ok by you.....
How did you deduce all of that nonsense above from my observational post? Having a bad night dude?
I think what the administration is challenging is that a pro-forma session that lasts more than three days is a recess.
Running against a congress that is only liked by freinds and family members (of congress) is probably a good strategy right now.
It's ok. It's not the first time and I'm sure it won't be the last "My Bad" from you ! :blink:
Well "THIS" you can take to the Bank, I won't be saying "MY BAD" meaning I said the Democrats won the general election,........and then had to admit I was Wrong !!!!!!!!!!!!!
BY the way ..southwind,...... W H E N are you, AND..dell...gonna commit/admit to WHO you want to win the GOP Primary ????????????????????????
(Not like I did'nt KNOW for SURE who you guys want) !!!! 🙄
I beg to differ, a vote for unionization is done by secret ballot, and are local lodge elections.
Someone on a different forum presented an interesting argument.
He argued that neither side will pursue this to the courts due to thatfact that this is a Congressional rule and not a law. Congress does not want tbe courts to determine whether or not a rule is legal or not. The rule being whether or not a pro-forma session of Congress actually meets the COTUS intent of being 'in session'.
Until that is determined Obama did not violet a law but. Congressional rule. Neither side is interested in drawing the courts into the fray over a minor rule violation. Not even sure it could be done withou violating the COTUS in terms of the separation of powers.
It is an interesting argument that seems pretty logical to me. Sounds like Obama played this one pretty well.
I personally do not agree with it but if Congress is going to play dirty then I guess the President has to as well.
Actually, its none of your business. That's why it's called a secret ballot, that is unless you're voting in a union election.
![]()
...........if Obama was a Black GOP President....do you actually think the DNC would move to impeach?
Ridiculous.
A Black GOP president?
The Republicans threw Herman Cain into a blender.