What's new

'HILL + Bill' are Grandparents !

NewHampshire Black Bears said:
IF the RE-PLUGS do win the senate and continue control of the House (which they will),......The TEA BAGS will go APE SHIIT and drive a wedge through the party, big enough to drive a Mack Truck through.
That's what you'd like to see, but I'm seeing the exact opposite.

The divisions you thought would be there after the primaries simply aren't materialising from where I sit in flyover land. What I'm seeing is along the lines of "rally behind the candidate" than the "screw you, we're staying home" attitude we saw from a lot of Tea Party and Libertarian leaning folks in 2012.
 
NewHampshire Black Bears said:
Then, by the time you 'consume' one another in the '16 primarys,..guess WHO will look like the only sane person on the final stage.
YUP, you got it.
 
GRANDMA....'HILL  !
If you say so, but the 2008 primaries were pretty ugly for the Dems. And then they rallied behind Obama.

I don't know why you'd expect otherwise amongst the GOP challengers, but hey, keep on believing in Granny's market power if it makes you all giddy. Maybe you can replace your happy blue pills with a picture of Granny?
 
eolesen said:
That's what you'd like to see, but I'm seeing the exact opposite.

The divisions you thought would be there after the primaries simply aren't materialising from where I sit in flyover land. What I'm seeing is along the lines of "rally behind the candidate" than the "screw you, we're staying home" attitude we saw from a lot of Tea Party and Libertarian leaning folks in 2012.
 

If you say so, but the 2008 primaries were pretty ugly for the Dems. And then they rallied behind Obama.

I don't know why you'd expect otherwise amongst the GOP challengers, but hey, keep on believing in Granny's market power if it makes you all giddy. Maybe you can replace your happy blue pills with a picture of Granny?
 You mean old "Hot Pants Hillary".
 
Now that IS funny.
 
So where is the village to raise her kid? Oh, Over-The-HILLary was talking about us poor folk on welfare!
 
http://townhall.com/columnists/markdavis/2014/09/30/clinton-baby-prompts-a-decision-more-important-than-hillarys-plans-n1898468

Two interesting points...

1) Is Hillary really willing to pass up the first two to four years of her grandchild's life to go out and campaign? My wife has a hard enough time working and missing out on time with our granddaughter.

2) Whose religion takes precedent, and how will that sit with the "losing" side? Chelsea is Protestant and her husband is Jewish. How will choosing neither one sit will with middle America?...
 
Why would anyone be concerned with Chelsea's daughters religion?

What else do you want know and what would that have to do with Hillary's policy plan?
 
signals said:
So where is the village to raise her kid? Oh, Over-The-HILLary was talking about us poor folk on welfare!
The "Village" ran out of idiots?
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
Why would anyone be concerned with Chelsea's daughters religion?

What else do you want know and what would that have to do with Hillary's policy plan?
 
Going one step further, why would anyone be concerned that Chelsea had a kid? we don't have a royal family in the US. Do we?
 
Well, why was anyone concerned with the Palins or their grandchild?....
 
eolesen said:
Well, why was anyone concerned with the Palins or their grandchild?....
Don't know? I wasn't! The Palin's have the right to live as they choose as does everyone else.
 
SparrowHawk said:
 
Going one step further, why would anyone be concerned that Chelsea had a kid? we don't have a royal family in the US. Do we?
Isn't it obvious?
 
The libtards are trying to "market" the Clinton family.
 
Tough job marketing Chelsea seeing how she looks like Howdy Doody.
 
Chelsea%20Ugly%20Its%20in%20the%20genes.jpg
 
41Nwc4di5UL.jpg

 
I mean seriously. can you tell the difference?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top