Ms Tree
Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2010
- Messages
- 9,731
- Reaction score
- 9,009
You're sitting on ' stolen ' land, Senor.....poor Davey Crocket....
Find me a country who is not.
You're sitting on ' stolen ' land, Senor.....poor Davey Crocket....
I think they did as they've held title for some 3000+ years. I guess you refer to God as the supreme authority.
My point in the Israel/Indians of the America's "O N L Y" was that it was christian illegal interference.
The cambodian thing ....duly noted ! 2/3/1003 wrongs, never make a right !
SS check ? Still cashing it, cause I earned the S O B ! 🙄
dell, there are(in this world) an ENORMOUS amount of people who believe in GOD etc. who don't recognize the bible (old and new) as a Supreme Authority. Maybe the non-believers (of the bible) could/should be Exterminated, to simplify things ???
The Spanish Inquisition comes to mind. !!
dell, there are(in this world) an ENORMOUS amount of people who believe in GOD etc. who don't recognize the bible (old and new) as a Supreme Authority. Maybe the non-believers (of the bible) could/should be Exterminated, to simplify things ???
The Spanish Inquisition comes to mind. !!
Well Tommy.......I think HISTORY supports the Jewish position. Has Israel ever lost their capital or promised land anywhere in 3000 years? Get back to me on this.
No dell, with the military they have, there not about to lose (most) anything, anytime soon, Obviously.
Tommy, you missed the boat once again.
If you noticed, and obviously you didn't, I referenced Israels possession of Jerusalem as their capital under King David and the promised land since Israels inception, some 3000 years ago. I wasn't aware their army back then was as good as it is today.
Oooops, my bad.
Let me re-read your specific post.
OK, I'm back. Your right, in that the Jews were first in "laying claim" to Jerusalem, and not losing it since.(followed in order by christianity, then Islam)
No argument that that American Indians were given a crappy deal.
But you can't live in tepee's forever.
When do you loose the 'victim' card?
Is using the 'victim' card enhancing the Indian Society?
True, it would have been better for England to send in teachers and lawyers first but was not realistic.
I still fail to see your analogy.
B) xUT
So then, why the issue with 1948?
There is more to this than "Victim". There are things the BIA is doing this very day that hamper the tribes ability to develop. The "Job" that has been done is still being done.
My Issue isn't with the city of jerusalem(which is an agreeably shared city as far as christianity and islam is concerned(not sure if the Jews feel that way), my 1948 Issue is with the Illegally occupied "country of Israel", minus jerusalem.