What's new

Iam Vote

Will the IAM vote pass?

  • YES

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • NO

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
RedOne said:
....
We just had a some agents to come from large city into our small station...and all they can do is load bags. Thats all they have done for 20 + years. In a small station agents must know how to work forms, work air freight, do pushbacks, deice, operate jetway, cater aircraft, clean aircraft, among other things ( I probably left out some).
[post="237065"][/post]​
Wait till you have to transfer to a hub. Productivity goes down the toilet. I still say they should have contracted out the hubs for FS & CS and kept the non hub cities mainline staff.
 
speedbird86 said:
Wait till you have to transfer to a hub. Productivity goes down the toilet. I still say they should have contracted out the hubs for FS & CS and kept the non hub cities mainline staff.
[post="237144"][/post]​

This kind of mentality will assure the demise of U's already fragile state and why I predict total failure to occur sometime this year. If I didn't believe this I would still be there, good luck to the ones still standing. Stand together or Die Apart.
 
deano said:
This kind of mentality will assure the demise of U's already fragile state and why I predict total failure to occur sometime this year.
[post="237165"][/post]​
You lost me Deano. Please explain "this kind of mentality". My journey was from a small station to a medium station and finally a hub until I found light at the end of my journey. With all due respect. I can tell you first hand by being there that employee productivity within the FS & CS ranks was much higher in a non hub facility. I do agree, and I hope and prey we're both wrong, but I do agree that the end for US is very near. It's truly a shame to because if this airline, dating back to 1987 when all the mergers started happening had been managed properly, I'm confident we wouldn't be talking about this today. I may be a bit off topic here and even ranting a bit, but I paid my dues so I feel I have the right. I put the blame for the demise of this airline squarely on the shoulders of management both current and mostly past administrations. The lack of vision and planning, the attitude of good ole boys, multi-million dollar blunders. Talk about mentality. Did you go through "mirror image". Mirror image meant everything we do is right and everything you do is wrong but after we spend millions training you the right way we'll go and spend millions more training you to do it the wrong way which was the right way to begin with but we were just too stupid or proud to admit it. :blink: Water flows down hill and that ain't all that flows down hill. IMO what this company has today is a product of what was dumped on them years ago from above. The difference today is that John Q. Customer isn't footing the bill for this ignorance anymore. Instead of paying $1198 RT they're paying $198 RT and they expect better service. But anyway, sorry for ranting. Just had to vent a bit.
Have a good day. 😀
 
delldude said:
SO HOW WE VOTING...I'M STILL UNSURE....
[post="237187"][/post]​
You're right dell. Remember this poll has a margin of error of -+99.9%. <_<
 
speedbird86 said:
You lost me Deano. Please explain "this kind of mentality".
[post="237181"][/post]​
Fine. Again in simple terms.

Fear will rule the day especially with the old timers, dissention will be high and is shown in your words in that post, too much discord, too much negatives to make a positive outcome. What they are shooting for is to have labor make way for a fire sale and with some posters attitudes it will happen.
 
deano said:
Fine. Again in simple terms.

Fear will rule the day especially with the old timers, dissention will be high and is shown in your words in that post, too much discord, too much negatives to make a positive outcome. What they are shooting for is to have labor make way for a fire sale and with some posters attitudes it will happen.

[post="237202"][/post]​
I'm not sorry if the truth hurts. The rank and file have or never have had any decisions as to the outcome of US demise other than to vote on contracts. Which by the way, at this time not one has been voted down. That tells me that although there may be posters here that may be negative, US labor force has by and large tried to save this company many times over. I don't consider that fear but rather frustration.
 
speedbird86 said:
I'm not sorry if the truth hurts. The rank and file have or never have had any decisions as to the outcome of US demise other than to vote on contracts. Which by the way, at this time not one has been voted down. That tells me that although there may be posters here that may be negative, US labor force has by and large tried to save this company many times over. I don't consider that fear but rather frustration.
[post="237209"][/post]​



You didn't sit beside the few old timers like I did during the 92 strike and watch them just about cry, and that was only two days into the strike! It's fear and you're in total denial thinking otherwise. Fear is how that company is run and so far it has been working for henchman Glass. Frustration is reserved for when there is hope, it's not frustration. As far as labor saving the company and only a few posters being negative: That is why I am now outside looking in.

Good Luck, and if the majority has your attitude, then God help the employees.

Frustration! Thanks for the laugh of the day…..Speaking of which, have a nice day. I know I will because U is no longer part of me and I shouldn’t even be here wasting my time, 15 years was too much!

Cheerio ___Curt
 
deano said:
   Fine. Again in simple terms.

    Fear will rule the day especially with the old timers, dissention will be high and is shown in your words in that post, too much discord, too much negatives to make a positive outcome. What they are shooting for is to have labor make way for a fire sale and with some posters attitudes it will happen.

[post="237202"][/post]​

You may be right. Fear may rule the day. You can blame the old timers, but the blame really lies elsewhere. The blame lies in the fact that your union has provided no leadership, no alternatives, no options, no plans, no future and no hope.

Working people formed unions in times of crisis to protect them from what we in this industry are going through. They did not form unions when times were good and companies gave raises, they formed when companies wanted concessions.

Working people learned that through collective action they had power.

In few other industries is the potential for labor as great as the labor intensive specific skilled aviation industry. The need for criminal free backrounds and the ability to secure a 10 year background check simply adds to labors leverage.

Labor has failed to make the most of this potential power, and the fault can be placed squarely on the divisive fractured structure of the labor movement in this industry.

During the deregulated era Labors structure in the airlines was acceptable, a mish mash of industrial unions that were organized like company unions mixed in with a few craft unions also organized along company lines was able to deliver acceptable performance.
However the deregulated Era presented new challenges that the unions never rose up to.

Where does the company have the advantage?

Seniority.

Workers have shown that they will give up everything in order to preserve seniority. The way we have it structured our most cherished benifit is the company's strongest weapon against us.

Our seniority is tied to the company, not the union.

If workers had portable seniority they would not be as willing to sacrifice everything else to preserve their relationship with one particular company. Seniority makes the union members relationship with the company more important than his relationship with the union.

In order for portable senioritty to be effective that union would need to have a monopoly on the entire industry, or at least the entire craft.

No longer would there be any progressions. This is the rate you pay for x workers. The lack of progressions makes it advantageous to hire experienced workers instead of inexperienced ones and keeps the system viable.

Well any way the point is that we need a major restructuring of the Labor movement in this industry. It will not happen from within as the leaders of the IAM, TWU and IBT lack the courage or the incentive to embark upon what would undoubtably be a tumultuous arduos task.

Resistance would not come from the members but from the leaders of the varous unions who are willing to sacrifice the well being of all their members to preserve their positions.

Lack of good leadership has led to the downfall of civilzations, in our case it led to the downfall of a career. Dont let the spinmasters that have assumed the postions that leaders should be filling tell you anything different, its not the members fault, its the leaders fault. When they say "Get involved", asking for specifics is not an anti-union act. When they blame you ask them what you need them for? Call their bluff and if they actually do ask you to do something specific, do it, then see what their next excuse will be.

The fact is there will be no change from within, we have only one option out there if we ever want to see this industry once again provide careers. We need to form industry-wide unions where members enjoy the same freedom of movement as assetts. Where we can speak as one and not let any company or court pick us apart one at a time. A union that will lead, a union that is specific to our industry. We need Airline industry unions. The IAM, TWU and IBT should be sent back to their respective industries, they have done enough damage to ours.
 
Speedbird you are wrong.

A contract was voted down in 1992, that is why the M&R group went on strike. A contract was voted down in the summer of 1999 and a better one ratified in October and the first vote on the concessions in 2002 was voted down.

Don't let the facts get in your way.
 
The high seniority workers will continue to cast the lower seniority workers out. This is throwing away the future. They will shurly eat it when those that were cast out flourish beyond them.
 
700UW said:
Speedbird you are wrong.

A contract was voted down in 1992, that is why the M&R group went on strike. A contract was voted down in the summer of 1999 and a better one ratified in October and the first vote on the concessions in 2002 was voted down.

Don't let the facts get in your way.
[post="237224"][/post]​

Yes and the IAM made them revote on the same concessions.

Remember "Give Dave a chance"? And "Dave is different"?

I remember posting on your boards then, pretty much everything I said came to pass. I wish it hadnt.
 
ggu23311 said:
The high seniority workers will continue to cast the lower seniority workers out. This is throwing away the future. They will shurly eat it when those that were cast out flourish beyond them.
[post="237232"][/post]​
This is very true. I see it, I worked with the ones who will do exactly that justifying it by saying the junior members would do the same because it's self preservation.

Bob, good post but I must tell you I was recently hired by a global company having thousands of plants everywhere, and in no plant do they have a union. I had to go through that ten year background check you mentioned, drug and alcohol tests, DOT records thoroughly checked out. The benefits are better than they ever where at U, the wages comparable. Jobs are bid like in a union except skill is just as important as seniority, schooling is provided to better yourself if one chooses. Also provided: sick days, 11 paid holidays, vacation after only 6 months of service, matching 401 that is unheard of. They don't have a defended pension fund that corporate America is taking away thru the court systems. This is only one company and I am sure many others exist just like it where people work and support their families without the constant depressing news of doom and gloom with wages and benefits being constantly down graded or completely taken away. You don't pay union dues and you are far better off. If this trend continues there will be no need to reorganize the unions to better serve their memberships like you suggest because people will migrate to the greener pastures of the non union work environments, and why in the hell wouldn’t they!?

I don't think the unions are coming to an end anytime soon, but I do believe they are in serious trouble. When one must pay dues that are not cheap and for that privilege receive constant cuts that creates a downgraded life style, well how long can this go on with unions justifying dues collection, how much more will people put up with being brutalized and paying dues for that brutalization privilege, how long Bob Owens, how long? That is the question you should be asking.

If this is a grand Corporate American plan to conquer unions, so far they are winning.

Curt
 
deano,Jan 9 2005, 09:01 PM]
If this trend continues there will be no need to reorganize the unions to better serve their memberships like you suggest because people will migrate to the greener pastures of the non union work environments, and why in the hell wouldn’t they!?

Well this has been a trend for some time, that why unions like the IAM are shrinking. Between their last two conventions they lost 25% of their members. At this rate they will no longer exist by 2016, and judgeing by the way they are performing maybe thats not a bad thing, their abscence could create a void for a better union.

The main problem is the undemocratic nature of these unions and the fact that once in power its nearly impossible to remove top officers. Stanley Aronowitz a radical professor a CUNY or one of those New York City colleges wrote a book called "From the ashes of the old". He cited this fact and coined a phase that I have often repeated that "once in place union officials are only removed by death or indictment". So you have these guys in place that you cant remove. They surround themselves with loyalists who are less competant -lest they pose a threat to his hegemony. These incompetants are in place to replace the leader when he either dies or is indicted, they continue the process, all of which leaves a power structure intact but that is populated by incompetants.


I don't think the unions are coming to an end anytime soon, but I do believe they are in serious trouble. When one must pay dues that are not cheap and for that privilege receive constant cuts that creates a downgraded life style, well how long can this go on with unions justifying dues collection, how much more will people put up with being brutalized and paying dues for that brutalization privilege, how long Bob Owens, how long? That is the question you should be asking.

I have. Human tolerance for abuse is astounding.

If this is a grand Corporate American plan to conquer unions, so far they are winning.

And the "leaders" are making it easy.

Good luck in your new profession. I've been in this 25 years. In 95 I had resolved to leave if things did not get better with the next contract, they did, briefly, but are now worse than ever. My wife started taking classes in the local community college last year. Doing well, 4.0. So I'm probably not going anywhere just yet so I may as well fight.
Curt
 
700UW said:
Speedbird you are wrong.

A contract was voted down in 1992, that is why the M&R group went on strike. A contract was voted down in the summer of 1999 and a better one ratified in October and the first vote on the concessions in 2002 was voted down.

Don't let the facts get in your way.
[post="237224"][/post]​
700 you're right about the '92 deal. I'm speaking in recent terms. If I'm not mistaken the '02 vote was voted down. Then a re-vote was taken without one word in the original TA being changed and it slipped in by a narrow margine. So I guess one could argue that a recent TA was voted down. The point I was trying to make was the employees gave everything the company ask for.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top