sounding a bit defensive for someone that "expected it".
Jim
A perfect Jimism. Throw a little something out there that looks like you are questioning a poster, but leave yourself a little room so you can deny it.
Here's one of my posts to jetz:
767jetz, on 31 July 2011 - 04:46 PM, said:
Wrong, wrong, wrong. This has nothing to do with "doing something illegal" wrt company policies or FAR's. This has to so with an illegal work action. All they have to do is prove that there was a concerted effort to slow down or hurt the company and it's game over. The text messages alone is enough to prove that. The charts and data just support the argument. A half dozen pilots trying to influence the rest in the name of getting a contract or fighting a seniority dispute is all it takes. Trust me. UA is already on this road with the injunction due to a half dozen pilots. USAPA is toast if the company goes after damages.
Pi brat said:
I think you are right, and as you said it has happened before.
So, when it happened at UA did it make you straighten up, fly right and be happy in your job? Did it motivate you to excel? Cause I have to be honest jetz, from the jumpseat riders I've had, you guys seem like the most miserable pilot group in the industry.
So, US may be successful in dropping the hammer, only to finish off the job of demoralizing and disenfranchising most of it pilots.
I suggest a different road for our management. That they call a time out. Say "Yeah, let's have on open forum for our LINE PILOTS to air their concerns. Nope, they decided to take a different road. Oh well.