CremaDiLimone
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2016
- Messages
- 1,818
- Reaction score
- 154
It wasn't 33.00 dos. I can assure you of that.
and that was with losing your insurance?
why would anyone waste their time with that?
It wasn't 33.00 dos. I can assure you of that.
Good question!!and that was with losing your insurance?
why would anyone waste their time with that?
Good question!!
and that was with losing your insurance?
why would anyone waste their time with that?
Stop supporting a card drive WeAAsles. And the solidarity meant so much that Sito C blocked negotiations the next week and put down the TWA hammer on prioritization matters. Not that I'm a big Sito fan because he is anti union as hell and right in the company's hip pocket. I applaud the TWU though in their efforts but it's TWA coming back to haunt them. Don't worry, you will get your new TA after re-enrollment...er......um......I think I just won another case I litigated, i.e., a new INTL election and got the Fake Election tossed out. Maybe that changes things again. Not until you understand that the new election I attained in 141 C Blocked Klemm and Sito from handing over our health care and has stalled negotiations will you ever learn that this isn't about the rogue TWU Local Presidents who all want to be king. I'm not a big Sidney fan but he has been the only one right about all of this, yet the other TWU Presidents are intimidated by him and you refuse to give him any credit for speaking the truth.Sorry ograc but that was the biggest show of Unity at AA that I've seen in my 22 years here bar none. The sign up sheet had over 3000 names on it for the entire day.
There was in attendance TWU, IAM, APA, APFA, CWA, IBT, AMFA and MORE. ALL putting aside any personal squabbles for a common goal.
You are ssssoooooo wrong here. The Company I heard expected at most maybe 300 people. Certainly not 3000. This event was pure UNITY and SOLIDARITY......
Stop supporting a card drive WeAAsles. And the solidarity meant so much that Sito C blocked negotiations the next week and put down the TWA hammer on prioritization matters. Not that I'm a big Sito fan because he is anti union as hell and right in the company's hip pocket. I applaud the TWU though in their efforts but it's TWA coming back to haunt them. Don't worry, you will get your new TA after re-enrollment...er......um......I think I just won another case I litigated, i.e., a new INTL election and got the Fake Election tossed out. Maybe that changes things again. Not until you understand that the new election I attained in 141 C Blocked Klemm and Sito from handing over our health care and has stalled negotiations will you ever learn that this isn't about the rogue TWU Local Presidents who all want to be king. I'm not a big Sidney fan but he has been the only one right about all of this, yet the other TWU Presidents are intimidated by him and you refuse to give him any credit for speaking the truth.
Sito is anti union. PERIOD. Worse than Lorenzo. I don't want to talk about the TWA deal, all one needs to do is point to the scoreboard and it's easy for everyone to see that the TWA peeps all got liquidated thanks to Sito and Roach and Girly man Tiberi.Tim, 700 spoke highly of Sito & O'Driscoll. What I don't get is if they did such great jobs in negotiations at TW why did they waive the LPPs and bring back concessionary agreement after concessionary agreement in TWs final years? Why didn't they call AAs bluff, they knew Carty wanted TW to eclipse UA/US and relieve ORD at the time.
Why does Sito get to stay and preside over the IAM if he isn't in an IAM shop? Did he retire from AA? Same story with Roach, why not get some new leadership in touch with the industry today.
Have you heard anything more about BA? The agents in BOS say they don't know what to expect but after DL 142 let management whack the single departure stations ATL, DFW, DEN, etc in the last agreement they aren't surprised.
Josh
June 2018. And as far as good health care, I think pilots didn't have a problem after they cashed in their health care for 16% 401k. I guess everything has a price for a majority.i realize that it may be professionally suicidal for elected and/or appointed iam negotiators to publicly say that they would consider bending on lus x laa medical...
...it may be palatable, if say, management is made aware of your vulnerable position(s) (elections in jan. '18??) and you counter with wage increases that are top-heavy at the start of the contract.
if the company acknowledges and is ok with fleet service topping out at $35.50/hr, earning $33.00 on date of signing should take much of the sting out of increased medical. for those legacy lus who believe that we will top out at $35.50 along with keeping their current medical, someone needs to explain the word, delusional, to them. that is more than out-of-line considering the weakness of unions in 2017 usa.
i don't argue and agree why not get it all. i won't say that is absurd...but, a very slim chance and ole slim just took the bus out of town.
the alternative is that the longer this drags on, the 2 parts of the assoc. may start eating each other with laa x lus employees taking militant sides.
And in many cases, using either book blows. Sometimes the best of both still sucks. For instance, who the hell still wants our PDO's? Your sick time sucks and so does ours. Your vacation sucks and so does ours. Your holidays suck and so does ours. So, maybe not "The Best of both" except for the goodies.I don't know why some people assume all you used was the AA IAM and TWU books to formulate language. You had old CBA books, UAL and SWA that you could work off of also. Not to mention off the head original ideas as well.
For a guy who's never been at the table , you're very critical of those who are??And in many cases, using either book blows. Sometimes the best of both still sucks. For instance, who the hell still wants our PDO's? Your sick time sucks and so does ours. Your vacation sucks and so does ours. Your holidays suck and so does ours. So, maybe not "The Best of both" except for the goodies.
Stop supporting a card drive WeAAsles. And the solidarity meant so much that Sito C blocked negotiations the next week and put down the TWA hammer on prioritization matters. Not that I'm a big Sito fan because he is anti union as hell and right in the company's hip pocket. I applaud the TWU though in their efforts but it's TWA coming back to haunt them. Don't worry, you will get your new TA after re-enrollment...er......um......I think I just won another case I litigated, i.e., a new INTL election and got the Fake Election tossed out. Maybe that changes things again. Not until you understand that the new election I attained in 141 C Blocked Klemm and Sito from handing over our health care and has stalled negotiations will you ever learn that this isn't about the rogue TWU Local Presidents who all want to be king. I'm not a big Sidney fan but he has been the only one right about all of this, yet the other TWU Presidents are intimidated by him and you refuse to give him any credit for speaking the truth.
3% above DL Weez $30.15x3%=$31.05..........$31.05-$30.81 =.24Crema is talking $35.00 at the end of the contract. $33.00 DOS.
Your remarks are fair and reasonable. Of course Parker shot his mouth off a long time ago about Delta plus 7 and how he would take care of employees. It's clear to see that he was telling lies. A little information to the membership can go far to remove some of the bickering .First off, your talking to the wrong person if you think any of my decisions are based on a reelection in 2018. I've always said, whenever the membership doesn't want me representing them anymore, I'm fine going back to my job.
So to answer your question, would I consider bending on medical. This contract has to be a cost positive contract. Cost positive enough to where it is leading industry. I can assure you that on the latest offer by the company, they were getting no where close to 35.00 a hour. Keep in mind that we are already schedule to go to 30.81 in September. So my answer to you on the insurance would be, let me see the 35.00 a hour offer by the company, and then we will talk. But don't hold your breath, because the 35.00 a hour offer won't come from the company.
3% above DL Weez $30.15x3%=$31.05..........$31.05-$30.81 =.24
24cents and probably 55cents differential. Not worth getting a stroke over
Hey Crema thought I'd get you back to Terra Firma with this chart. Remember first Parker was saying (Pre PS) 7% above. Then (Post PS) he went down to 3% above. (Currently we're only 1% above)
So you can see the math.
UAL
View attachment 11924