Judge Upholds Airline Unionization Rule Change

[Airlinelifer]

Judge Friedman ruled,

ATA - DENIED
D E L T A employees motion - DENIED

You want union representation - VOTE YES

Don't want union representation - VOTE NO or

YOU DON'T CARE or you go with the flow (QUE SERA SERA) or voting process beyond your comprehension or your in a TV reality series and don't have time to vote - THEN YOU DON'T COUNT EITHER WAY.

 

[dapoes]

Judge Friedman ruled,

ATA - DENIED
D E L T A employees motion - DENIED

You want union representation - VOTE YES

Don't want union representation - VOTE NO or

YOU DON'T CARE or you go with the flow (QUE SERA SERA) or voting process beyond your comprehension or your in a TV reality series and don't have time to vote - THEN YOU DON'T COUNT EITHER WAY.

Meh, sit back and relax for the appeals process.

 

[Airlinelifer]

Meh, sit back and relax for the appeals process.

Who's holding up the representation vote now?

 

[dapoes]

Who's holding up the representation vote now?

Im willing to wait for however long it takes. Even if DAL doesn't contest and the ATA finds its way to the SCOTUS....and suceeds, the vote could be invalidated. Look at recent events with the NLRB and the SCOTUS. http://workinprogress.firedoglake.com/2010/06/17/supreme-court-ruling-wipes-out-600-nlrb-decisions/

It would be in the best interest of everyone if and when the SCOTUS would make the final ruling. Judge Friedman admitted that his decision would most likely be appealed. All he did was kick the can down the road.

 

[700UW]

The NLRB has nothing to do with airline unions, that would be the NMB

 

[dapoes]

The NLRB has nothing to do with airline unions, that would be the NMB

You missed the point all together and didn't understand the relevance of the article it. Just because decisions was made and enforced by the entity (NLRB) an issue was pushed to the SCOTUS to effectively negate 600 decisions that were made from the NRLB.

So again, even if DAL doesn't contest and the ATA appeals the NMB ruling and finds its way to the SCOTUS....and succeeds, the vote could be invalidated altogether. NMB doesn't trump SCOTUS.

 

[Airlinelifer]

You missed the point all together and didn't understand the relevance of the article it. Just because decisions was made and enforced by the entity (NLRB) an issue was pushed to the SCOTUS to effectively negate 600 decisions that were made from the NRLB.

So again, even if DAL doesn't contest and the ATA appeals the NMB ruling and finds its way to the SCOTUS....and succeeds, the vote could be invalidated altogether. NMB doesn't trump SCOTUS.

Why is it so hard for you to comprehend that the "Yes/No vote" will show how Delta employees really feel about representation. I guess the "Give a Rip, Don't Click, Don't Vote" campaign will have to be altered.

 

[dapoes]

Why is it so hard for you to comprehend that the "Yes/No vote" will show how Delta employees really feel about representation. I guess the "Give a Rip, Don't Click, Don't Vote" campaign will have to be altered.

I actually comprehend the concept just fine. It is some who think after all this time that somehow this change is going to affect the outcome of the election. It wont.They never had the votes then and they wont have them now. Pretty pathetic that they have to scratch to eek out every last hope for a vote. Reeks of desperation and instability.

And yes you are correct, im sure the Vote No campaign will be in full swing. Be careful what you wish for, it can often bite back. 😀

 

[tech2101]

Im willing to wait for however long it takes. Even if DAL doesn't contest and the ATA finds its way to the SCOTUS....and suceeds, the vote could be invalidated. Look at recent events with the NLRB and the SCOTUS. http://workinprogress.firedoglake.com/2010/06/17/supreme-court-ruling-wipes-out-600-nlrb-decisions/

It would be in the best interest of everyone if and when the SCOTUS would make the final ruling. Judge Friedman admitted that his decision would most likely be appealed. All he did was kick the can down the road.

That was because they did not have a quorum as set forth by the rules dictated by congress.

The Supreme Court will not hear a case on this issue (NMB).

 

[dapoes]

That was because they did not have a quorum as set forth by the rules dictated by congress.

The Supreme Court will not hear a case on this issue (NMB).

ie: Your opinion based on zero facts even tho the SCOTUS has upheld....twice.

 

[tech2101]

ie: Your opinion based on zero facts even tho the SCOTUS has upheld....twice.

Never mind. I almost bit.

 

[dapoes]

Never mind. I almost bit.

Care to refute or has a Garfield cat got your tongue?

 

[Airlinelifer]

Care to refute or has a Garfield cat got your tongue?

http://bapwild.com/blog/?cat=18

 

[dapoes]

http://bapwild.com/blog/?cat=18

Err ok, your link says nothing about the two well documented cases where the SCOTUS upheld the process...twice.

 

[Airlinelifer]

Err ok, your link says nothing about the two well documented cases where the SCOTUS upheld the process...twice.

Did you read your link? What does SCOTUS deciding that the NLRB should have a minimum of three members before hearing cases have to do with the voting rules change at the NMB?

What ever your throwing at the wall, it's not sticking.

Let's look at the last 8 months:

Voting Rules are proposed *
Comment Period*
NMB publishes FInal Rule on the May10th edition of the Federal Register*
June 10th change pushed back to the 30th of June*
Court denying ATA the Motion for Discovery*
Court denying the ATA an Injunction/Summary Judgement*

vs.

"I'm willing to wait for however long it takes. Even if DAL doesn't contest and the ATA finds its way to the SCOTUS."
"The VOTE NO csmpaign will be in full swing"
"It is some who think after all this time that somehow this change is going to affect the outcome of the election."

Talk about reeking of desperation and instability.