Kansas lawmaker introduces, and state house passes, a new law making it legal to discriminate agains

[delldude]

Just Ain't Right broadening their tent to Mooslims and Communissss!?

 
 
Naw, that be the Obama tent....
 

 

[KCFlyer]

 
 
Naw, that be the Obama tent....
 

And if you're gonna have butt sex, make sure there is a vagina on the other side, just to be safe. 

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

I see a pattern with you and your posting. When someone is winning the debate with factual information, you simply call them stupid.

Another fact is that when someone is losing a debate, they resort to "intellectually dishonest" tactics (something you seem to have mastered):

Here is what I have seen of you:

"Stereotyping:

debater “proves” his point about a particular person by citing a stereotype that supposedly applies to the group that opponent is a member of; dismissing criticism by academic researchers by citing Ivory Tower stereotypes is an example of this debate tactic. For example, Professor David Romer of Cal did a study that found coaches should go for a first down far more often and kick far less on fourth down; Some coaches laughed and rejected his findings because he is a “professor,” turning the report sideways when reading it, dismissing Romer as “Ivory Tower.” If Romer is wrong, it is because of an error or omission in his facts or logic; not because he is a college professor."

"Name calling:

debater tries to diminish the argument of his opponent by calling the opponent a name that is subjective and unattractive; for example, cult members and bad real estate gurus typically warn the targets of their frauds that “dream stealers” will try to tell them the cult or guru is giving them bad advice; name calling is only intellectually dishonest when the name in question is ill defined or is so subjective that it tells the listener more about the speaker than the person being spoken about"

http://www.johntreed.com/debate.html

Carry on.

[SIZE=10.5pt]I just call it like I see it.  If you don't like it don't read my posts. [/SIZE]
 
I have lost nothing.  I supply documented facts all the time; the left just has an uncanny, willful, ability to ignore them. They do not want anything to interfere with their fantasy world or to criticize their agenda.
 
I could care less about studies. From what I have seen most studies have a political bent and are designed to give the answer people with an agenda want the public to see. The left AND right use that tactic.
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
 
I deal in fact not opinion polls, studies, or statistics. Only a small portion of the section I posted, as far as I am concerned, has any validity. I have put that part in bold lettering for you.. The rest of it is hearsay.
 
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/basics/ataglance.html
 
Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) of all races and ethnicities remain the population most profoundly affected by HIV.
 
In 2010, the estimated number of new HIV infections among MSM was 29,800, a significant 12% increase from the 26,700 new infections among MSM in 2008.
 
Although MSM represent about 4% of the male population in the United States, in 2010, MSM accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males and 63% of all new infections. MSM accounted for 52% of all people living with HIV infection in 2009, the most recent year these data are available.
 
Carry on.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Why the obsession with who does what with whom?  

I don't know. Why don't you ask the organizers of the Gay Pride Parade and The American Airlines Rainbow Team? They seem to go out of their way to advertise it.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Especially with the hetero trend of "hooking up"

Google all the stories of gays arrested for "hooking up" at public parks and rest stops then try that argument again.

 

[xUT]

HIV Incidence

 

Overall
Comparing 2008 to 2010, the overall estimated number of HIV infections remained stable in every age group and in all racial/ethnic groups. There were decreases among women; including African American women. However burden is still high among African Americans and men who have sex with men (MSM). There were sharp increases in youth, especially young African American MSM.

 

 

Transmission Category
Comparing 2008 to 2010, the estimated number of new HIV infections among MSM increased 12%, from 26,700 (95% CI: 23,400–30,000) in 2008 to 29,800 (95% CI: 26,200–33,500) in 2010. The number of new HIV infections among females with infection attributed to heterosexual contact decreased 18% from 9,800 (95% CI: 8,200–11,400) in 2008 to 8,000 (95% CI: 6,700–9,200) in 2010. In 2010, the majority of new HIV infections was attributed to male-to-male sexual contact (63% overall and 78% among males). Among females, the largest percentage of new HIV infections was attributed to heterosexual contact (84%).

Some people never learn.
After this disease becomes immune to the 'cocktail' of drugs now used to suppress it (not cure), it will once again kill millions of people.
 
And I have to pay for your bad decisions and 'life style'.
 
B) xUT
 

 

[xUT]

And if you're gonna have butt sex, make sure there is a vagina on the other side, just to be safe. 

You seem to have an affinity with butt sex.
How did that work out 4 U?
😛

 

[Ms Tree]

 
[SIZE=10.5pt]I just call it like I see it.  If you don't like it don't read my posts. [/SIZE]
 
I have lost nothing.  I supply documented facts all the time; the left just has an uncanny, willful, ability to ignore them. They do not want anything to interfere with their fantasy world or to criticize their agenda.
 
I could care less about studies. From what I have seen most studies have a political bent and are designed to give the answer people with an agenda want the public to see. The left AND right use that tactic.
[SIZE=10.5pt] [/SIZE]
 
I deal in fact not opinion polls, studies, or statistics. Only a small portion of the section I posted, as far as I am concerned, has any validity. I have put that part in bold lettering for you.. The rest of it is hearsay.
 
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/basics/ataglance.html
 
Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) of all races and ethnicities remain the population most profoundly affected by HIV.
 
In 2010, the estimated number of new HIV infections among MSM was 29,800, a significant 12% increase from the 26,700 new infections among MSM in 2008.
 
Although MSM represent about 4% of the male population in the United States, in 2010, MSM accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males and 63% of all new infections. MSM accounted for 52% of all people living with HIV infection in 2009, the most recent year these data are available.
 
Carry on.
 

Emphasis added.
 
You do not like studies just facts (where do the facts that you like come from) and in the same post you quote a study by the CDC that you agree with.  WTF??????

 

[Ms Tree]

I don't know. Why don't you ask the organizers of the Gay Pride Parade and The American Airlines Rainbow Team? They seem to go out of their way to advertise it.

 
 
I was asking the people like your self who seem to be obsessed with depriving people of equality.  
 
When people are seeking equality how does one do it without bringing it to peoples attention.  Both women and Blacks had their movements to gain equality under the law, that seems to be how its done.

 

[Ms Tree]

Google all the stories of gays arrested for "hooking up" at public parks and rest stops then try that argument again.

And stories of gays hooking up are so much better than 'facts' about how many people do this right?  You did say you dealt in facts not studies right?  So are all the stories factual?  Do you know exactly how many gays do this as opposed to heteros? 

 

[Ms Tree]

HIV Incidence
 
 
Some people never learn.
After this disease becomes immune to the 'cocktail' of drugs now used to suppress it (not cure), it will once again kill millions of people.
 
And I have to pay for your bad decisions and 'life style'.
 
B) xUT
 
 

 
First there is no factual evidence to support the idea that homosexuality is a decision.  Secondly, you pay for the bad decisions of people every day.  Alcoholism, smoking, obesity to name three and those three kill far more people than HIV does.   And those actually are decisions. I have yet to see the right advocate for laws or constitutional amendments against these actions.

 

[La Li Lu Le Lo]

Emphasis added.
 
You do not like studies just facts (where do the facts that you like come from) and in the same post you quote a study by the CDC that you agree with.  WTF??????

edited
 
MSM accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males and 63% of all new infections
 
THAT IS A FACT. The data was collected from recorded diagnoses through clinical testing.
 
 

And stories of gays hooking up are so much better than 'facts' about how many people do this right?  You did say you dealt in facts not studies right?  So are all the stories factual?  

Spin it how you like. The arrest happened. They are a matter of public record. THAT IS A FACT.

 

[AdAstraPerAspera]

Not all gays necessarily have anal sex, you know.

 

[delldude]

 
 
I was asking the people like your self who seem to be obsessed with depriving people of equality.  
 
When people are seeking equality how does one do it without bringing it to peoples attention.  Both women and Blacks had their movements to gain equality under the law, that seems to be how its done.

 
You have these deep crusader like attributes....Where's you're F-ing compassion to those in Russia or the ME who lose their lives over deviant sexual behavior?

 

[delldude]

Not all gays necessarily have anal sex, you know.

 
Its a stigma.....