USA320Pilot
Veteran
Hawk:
That's a very interesting development. Is SLV an acronym for "sick leave"?
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot
That's a very interesting development. Is SLV an acronym for "sick leave"?
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot
It's far more interesting from where I sit than it would be if I had skin in the game. <_<USA320Pilot said:Regardless, it will be interesting watching this play out during the next couple of months.
USA320Pilot,USA320Pilot said:USFlyer:
I agree with your comments, but remember this: The CWA proposal was an opener and once the Board of Arbitration issues its Opinion & Award, watch the IAM change its position.
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot
An "OPENER" ? Thats an understatement if I ever saw one. No one in their right mind would ever agree to that or anything even remotely close to it. Its an insult at best and intimidation at worst. I haven't seen the arbitration decision yet. Is it out or are you using your unnamed sources again? You've got some nerve! :down: SavyUSA320Pilot said:USFlyer:
I agree with your comments, but remember this: The CWA proposal was an opener and once the Board of Arbitration issues its Opinion & Award, watch the IAM change its position.
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot
Bzzzzzt! Wrong!USA320Pilot said:GECAS/Bombardier/Embraer, the ATSB, and RSA are turning up the heat on labor. I firmly believe the company's proposal was an opener and the airline does not want to enter bankruptcy, but the company is prepared to do so, if necessary.
I disagree... UAIR does not have piles of money around...oldiebutgoody said:Exactly!
That's why they really can't expect to prevail in court. Any trip to court will only be to liquidate, IMO. I think UAIR is far from having to do that!
The IAM will not change its position as we are going to win the arbitration, care to make a wager on what Mr Bloch rules?USA320Pilot said:USFlyer:
I agree with your comments, but remember this: The CWA proposal was an opener and once the Board of Arbitration issues its Opinion & Award, watch the IAM change its position.
Respectfully,
USA320Pilot
Think about what you are saying! Why would the creditors, who stand to lose MOST if not ALL of their investment, force UAIR into chapter 7? Makes NO SENSE at all. They have got to see that a better business plan, possibly even a merger of some type, stands to get them out of this "jam", and if the industry improves (which it will, eventually, or MUCH MORE of the US economy will suffer), they could even make a buck (which is what it's all about). This BS about using loan covenants to beat the employees over the head again is ridiculous; if UAIR isthat close to the brink it's already gone. The key to airline profitability is ASSET UTILIZATION! Not continually "raping" the hired help.funguy2 said:I disagree... UAIR does not have piles of money around...
Furthermore, once they run out of money, and fail to pay bills, the creditors can force BK... So in effect, the ATSB can force BK when/if UAIR defaults on the loan.
HAWK,Hawk said:The company will purge the (SLV) and five-hour penalty for an interim period. This is a starting point to build a bridge to eliminate any cultural skepticism and extending the olive branch.
If they (IAM-M) win, maybe.USA320Pilot said:I agree with your comments, but remember this: The CWA proposal was an opener and once the Board of Arbitration issues its Opinion & Award, watch the IAM change its position.