Let's play what if!

Insp4

Veteran
May 27, 2016
6,084
906
What if the ongoing 2020 election audit finds that the votes there in Arizona were indeed manipulated, and Trump actually won that State? `And what if it was proven that their voting machines were in fact hacked? The same machines used in many key States? ........ What if it was proven Trump did in fact win that election?......... What then? And I realize this is more than a stretch! But we are playing "What if" here! Would the powers to be, both Democrat, and Republican, in Washington, just decide to cover it up to protect their own, and avoid a Constitutional crisis? ............ Your opinion!
 
Last edited:
What if you didn’t spend all your time on Facebook, and started watching FoxNews, and your cable crashed, and you started talking to your neighbor who still has a Trump sign in his yard, and he told you his cat is channeling Thomas Jefferson, and it told him if the founding fathers anticipated Trump they would have allowed self-declared kings to rule the United States.

Would you watch the cat while your neighbor went to Washington for the coronation?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kev3188
What if the ongoing 2020 election audit finds that the votes there in Arizona were indeed manipulated, and Trump actually won that State? `And what if it was proven that their voting machines were in fact hacked? The same machines used in many key States? ........ What if it was proven Trump did in fact win that election?......... What then? And I realize this is more than a stretch! But we are playing "What if" here! Would the powers to be, both Democrat, and Republican, in Washington, just decide to cover it up to protect their own, and avoid a Constitutional crisis? ............ Your opinion!
That's not really an audit. But if any of that happened, the FIRST thing that would be done is to audit the audit, since the lead auditor already believes that Trump won and has already done a few things that could call the audit into question. Trump didn't win the election. The only "evidence" driving all of these are the words of Donald John Trump. And if you are keeping score at home, Trump said a lot of words of the past four years, and many of those words were fantasy and lies. And the easiest way to tell if Trump was lying was to see if his lips were moving.

It doesn't matter though, because Trump has basically accomplished his mission of destroying democracy in the US. If the Democrats win in 2024...you already think there is fraud. Trump's been telling you that the 2020 election was rigged and full of fraud since BEFORE he was elected in 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robbedagain
There is no "what if."

Trump went 0-for-everything in court.

The reality is that the GOP isn't interested in "election integrity." These silly exercises and performative outrage are all cover to facilitate voter suppression nationwide.

They could at least be intellectually honest about it...
 
  • Like
Reactions: robbedagain
That's not really an audit. But if any of that happened, the FIRST thing that would be done is to audit the audit, since the lead auditor already believes that Trump won and has already done a few things that could call the audit into question. Trump didn't win the election. e are the words of Donald John Trump. And if you are keeping score at home, Trump said a lot of words of the past four years, and many of those words were fantasy and lies. And the easiest way to tell if Trump was lying was to see if his lips were moviThe only "evidence" driving all of thesng.

It doesn't matter though, because Trump has basically accomplished his mission of destroying democracy in the US. If the Democrats win in 2024...you already think there is fraud. Trump's been telling you that the 2020 election was rigged and full of fraud since BEFORE he was elected in 2016.
K.C. You used the prevailing leftest mantra that there was no "evidence".......... But there is! Trump's team has hundreds of signed "affidavits" of wrong doing on fill............ So, are "affidavits" legal in a court of law as "evidence"? ........ Yes they are! So to say that there is no "evidence" in itself, is a false statement! ........ But, if the liberal's say the phrase often enough, they believe, people will believe it is true. And obviously in your case they have succeeded! ........ This is a page directly out of the Democrat's playbook. And just one example of what they would have you believe.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: robbedagain
K.C. You used the prevailing leftest mantra that there was no "evidence".......... But there is! Trump's team has hundreds of signed "affidavits" of wrong doing on fill............ So, are "affidavits" legal in a court of law as "evidence"? ........ Yes they are! So to say that there is no "evidence" in itself, is a false statement! ........ But, if the liberal's say the phrase often enough, they believe, people will believe it is true. And obviously in your case they have succeeded! ........ This is a page directly out of the Democrat's playbook. And just one example of what they would have you believe.
They have affidavids too. So....what evidence is there that the person signing the affiidavit is telling the truth? I mean, that drunk chick that was from Michigan signed an affidavit....but they didn't bother pursuing it since her testimony pretty much proved that she didn't have a clue about where she even was. And I wonder how many affidavit signers would hold up when they are questioned in court. Affidavits in and of themselves are....nothing. I mean.....there are some women who signed affidavits that said Trump raped them...why didn't we believe THOSE. Some of those affidavits were people saying "I seen them rolling a cooler into the counting room"....but they never said what was in the cooler. Diet Coke isn't fraud. And they didn't know if they were Biden ballots or Diet Coke. So yeah...there is no evidence.

And as far as your comment about saying something enough and people will believe it...in November 20163, Trump was saying that there was fraud and he would have won the popular vote if it wasn't for all the illegals voting.. No evidence. In July 2020 he was saying that if he wasn't reelected, it would be because of fraud and a rigged election. He repeated THAT several times BEFORE the election. So he was 'greasing the skids' in preparation for losing. He lost...you HEARD that if he lost it's because of fraud, and you are predisposed to believe it because he told you enough times in the months leading up to the election.
 
K.C. you are showing your ignorance again! An affidavit is a legal document. The consequences of falsifying one is jail time! It's called "perjury"!!! ......... But, we have to give you a pass on that one, because liberals really don't believe in that word "consequences" for one's actions now
do they?
 
K.C. you are showing your ignorance again! An affidavit is a legal document. The consequences of falsifying one is jail time! It's called "perjury"!!! ......... But, we have to give you a pass on that one, because liberals really don't believe in that word "consequences" for one's actions now
do they

So if the women signed an affidavit saying that Trump raped them, you believe it...right? Do you support rapists, or should they face consequences. After all...there are affidavits saying that he did.

Are you saying that lawyers everywhere see an affidavit and throw in the towel, accepting defeat becuase....it's an affidavit? Or do you think they might call their bluff and depose them...ask them about that cooler that they seen being rolled into the counting room. When the lawyer asks...."how many ballots did you seen in the cooler", what does the affidavit signer say? Perjury is a crime too (ask Bill Clinton). If they didn't see any, then the only thing the affidavit proves is that they seen a cooler being wheeled into the counting room. So....where's the proof.
 
Listen K.C. if the Democrats had such a document they would have paraded it out here long ago. Saying you have one, and actually producing it are two completely different things. If they attempted to go forward with such B.S. Trump would eat their lunch, and they know it! But what they are good at is using a story like that, even if they can't prove it, as propaganda to put doubt in people's minds......... And I can't believe you would bring up " I didn't have sexual relations with that women" Bill Clinton!
 
Last edited:
Listen K.C. if the Democrats had such a document they would have paraded it out here long ago. Saying you have one, and actually producing it are two completely different things. If they attempted to go forward with such B.S. Trump would eat their lunch, and they know it! But what they are good at is using a story like that, even if they can't prove it, as propaganda to put doubt in people's minds......... And I can't believe you would bring up " I didn't have sexual relations with that women" Bill Clinton!

But....there were AFFIDAVITS. Using your definition, they are true. OR if these haven't been proven, then.....neither have the affidavits claiming fraud. See where I'm going with this?
 
But....there were AFFIDAVITS. Using your definition, they are true. OR if these haven't been proven, then.....neither have the affidavits claiming fraud. See where I'm going with this?
Not really K.C. Trump went to court with a fist full of affidavits claiming irregularities witnessed by pol workers, and others. But he couldn't find a judge with balls enough to even look at them. Do the Democrats really have an affidavit? Is that what you are saying? Is there some poor little girl somewhere out there claiming Trump raped her? Why hasn't she come forward by now? .........And, using your logic, Trump found hundreds of people willing to sign a document that "if" proven false knew they would go to jail? This whole line about Trump raping someone is total B.S. nothing more!........ In the meantime, the Arizona audit continues!
 
Last edited: