What's new

Merger Fleet Plan Information

USA320Pilot

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2003
Messages
8,175
Reaction score
1,539
The combined business entity will reduce its fleet from 419 to 361 aircraft, down from a total of 419 mainline aircraft flown by the separate companies at the beginning of 2005. To achieve this reduction, US Airways projects returning 25 additional aircraft by the end of next year in addition to the 46 it already plans to return, with nearly all of the aircraft returned to GECAS.

Today the ALPA MEC received a briefing on the merger and here are some key points:

US Airways’ fleet will not be reduced right now other than what has already been announced. The breakdown of the reduction includes:

10 A319s - One A319 from February through August and 3 A319s in October. These are non-EOW aircraft.

11 B737s in May 2005.

10 B737s in August 2005.

10 B737s in 2006 and 5 B737s in 2007.

25 additional aircraft will be removed from the fleet and the aircraft leaving the fleet will be "metered". They will exit over an "extended" period with an exact timeline still unclear.

There has been no decision made on the B767 and B757 fleet.

Tonight CLT TV station WBTV interviewed America West CEO Doug Parker who said a total of about 60 planes would be parked with 50 from US Airways and 10 from America West.

The B757 announced for removal on Pilot Bid 05-03 for August and September is not being removed from the fleet, it is scheduled for overhaul.

There are no plans to furlough any pilot and the company is trying to make the aircraft reduction “measuredâ€￾ and work with attrition and resignations.

No decision has been made on the Republic – US Airways MDA agreement.

Decisions such as the aircraft reduction and locating the headquarters in Tempe was made because US Airways is in bankruptcy and reject leases.

New aircraft orders:

The combined airline will take delivery of 13 A320s previously ordered by America West and Airbus has agreed to reschedule and reconfirm 30 A320s from 2006 through 2008 to 2009 through 2010.

To rationalize international flying, the merged company will work with Airbus to transition to an all-Airbus international fleet of A330 aircraft and then beginning in 2011 the company will be the launch customer for the A350, with deliveries scheduled for 2010 through 2013. The company will begin service to Hawaii.

Miscellaneous Key Points:

The combination would form one of the industry’s most financially stable airlines with $10 billion in annual revenues, approximately $2 billion in total cash and among the lowest debt levels of all major airlines.

RSA has not invested in the merger. Bruce Lakefield said talks with David Bronner are continuing.

The new airline is expected to have one of the most efficient work groups in the industry. Once the anticipated annual cost savings and revenue synergies of over $600 million are implemented; the new airline will be positioned for profitability at oil prices above $50 per barrel.

According to the New York Times, “The new US Airways would rank ahead of Continental and Southwest when measured by available seat miles,â€￾ which would make the new business entity the fifth largest U.S. carrier.

Regards,

USA320Pilot
 
You say:
..."To achieve this reduction, US Airways projects returning 25 additional aircraft by the end of next year"...

Then:
..."25 additional aircraft will be removed from the fleet and the aircraft leaving the fleet will be "metered". They will exit over an "extended" period with an exact timeline still unclear."...

Same 25 aircraft?
 
USA320Pilot said:
RSA has not invested in the merger. Bruce Lakefield said talks with David Bronner are continuing.
Regards,
USA320Pilot
[post="271343"][/post]​
Gee Wrong Again!

Current US Airways Chairman David Bronner would not be part of the new company, and the Retirement Systems of Alabama, which he heads, would lose its $240 million investment in the airline.

Charlotte Observer Story (Free Subscription)
 
I like the part about the most financially stable airline in the United States. Two airlines that owe the US Government over a billion dollars in Loans, Millions more to leasing companies and creditors..

The nightmare has just begun.

I suppose Southwest, jetBlue and AirTran are not nearly as financially stable as the new US Airways!! They might as well shut down now.

The fleet plan is even better..

737-300 fleet. 5 different configurations.

737-400 fleet. 2 different configurations.

757-200 fleet. 5 different configurations.

767-200 fleet 2 different configurations.

A320 fleet. 3 different configurations, 2 engine types.

A321 fleet. All standard.

A319 fleet. 3 different configurations, 2 engine types.

A330 fleet. All standard.

5 fleet types with 20 different configurations.
 
I don't know where this low-debt comes from, last I saw HP had more long-term debt than any other U.S. airline.
 
justaumechanic said:
I like the part about the most financially stable airline in the United States. Two airlines that owe the US Government over a billion dollars in Loans, Millions more to leasing companies and creditors..

The nightmare has just begun.
[post="271375"][/post]​
Some observers say the deal won't work and compare it to "combining two one-legged men.
 
justaumechanic said:
The fleet plan is even better..

737-300 fleet. 5 different configurations.

737-400 fleet. 2 different configurations.

757-200 fleet. 5 different configurations.

767-200 fleet 2 different configurations.

A320 fleet. 3 different configurations, 2 engine types.

A321 fleet. All standard.

A319 fleet. 3 different configurations, 2 engine types.

A330 fleet. All standard.

5 fleet types with 20 different configurations.
[post="271375"][/post]​
i don't mean to be continually bringing up the past but weren't we told before on this long winding road of givebacks that all this diversity doesn't make good economic sense?
 
700UW said:
Gee Wrong Again!
Charlotte Observer Story (Free Subscription)
[post="271373"][/post]​

No need to be so negative all the time. If you had listened to the conference calls yesterady - this question was brought up to Bruce and Doug. They both CLEARLY stated that they are still talking with Doc Bronner about possibly investing in the new company. I don't agree with everything 320 posts here, but at least he isn't reporting anything that is incorrect as far as this is concerned.
 
USA320Pilot said: “RSA has not invested in the merger. Bruce Lakefield said talks with David Bronner are continuing.â€

700UW said: “Gee Wrong Again!â€

The Charlotte Observer wrote: Current US Airways Chairman David Bronner would not be part of the new company, and the Retirement Systems of Alabama, which he heads, would lose its $240 million investment in the airline.

Dfw79 said: “No need to be so negative all the time. If you had listened to the conference calls yesterady - this question was brought up to Bruce and Doug. They both CLEARLY stated that they are still talking with Doc Bronner about possibly investing in the new company. I don't agree with everything 320 posts here, but at least he isn't reporting anything that is incorrect as far as this is concerned.

USA320Pilot comments: 700UW, with all due respect, Dfw79 is correct. During yesterday’s conference call Bruce Lakefield indicated that company is in discussions with RSA about the pension fund investing in the new business enterprise.

If you would like to hear Lakefield’s comments please click onto the following links:

US Airways – America West Merger Conference Call

Click Here

US Airways – America West Webcast

Click Here

Regards,

USA320Pilot
 
Actually... 700UW is probably right... According to the press release, US Airways creditors will get 14% of the new company's equity. I beleive RSA is a creditor, as I thought they had some debt as well as equity of the current US Airways. (Correct me if I am wrong)
 
funguy2 said:
Actually... 700UW is probably right...  According to the press release, US Airways creditors will get 14% of the new company's equity.  I beleive RSA is a creditor, as I thought they had some debt as well as equity of the current US Airways.  (Correct me if I am wrong)
[post="271572"][/post]​

RSA's big loan is the $75 million of the Tranche II ATSB loan, but that's secured, and will be paid back in full, so that shouldn't get them any equity.

They do own some EETCs and the like on some of US's planes, so that'll get them a bit of equity, but I don't think it'll be much.
 
USA320Pilot said:
USA320Pilot said: “RSA has not invested in the merger. Bruce Lakefield said talks with David Bronner are continuing.â€￾

As of a few minutes age...looks like RSA is NOT going to invest further in the new company. Greeter. (Just saw it on the Google News page)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top