Merger Relief for American Airlines: April 24, 2012

USA320Pilot

Veteran
May 18, 2003
8,175
1,539
www.usaviation.com
Merger Relief for American Airlines: April 24, 2012

ZACHS Investment Report

The rumors about American Airlines, a subsidiary of AMR Corp., merging with another airline have been heating up since the company filed for bankruptcy protection in November last year. Finally, the market buzz appears to be coming true with the three labor unions of American Airlines supporting a plan for the bankrupt carrier’s merger with rival US Airways Group Inc. ( LCC), the fifth largest U.S. airline.

This move represents a first step toward a consolidation, though creditors, directors, and management are yet to give their green signal.

The three unions – Allied Pilots Association, Association of Professional Flight Attendants and Transport Workers Union – represent as many as 55,000 employees at American Airlines. According to them, the merger would save about 6,200 jobs as opposed to what AMR Corp. can as a standalone entity, and speed up the restructuring process.

We believe the potential American Airlines-US Airways merger could change the competitive dynamics of the airline industry. The combination would be strong enough in scope and size to compete with their larger rivals, United Continental Holdings Inc. ( UAL) and Delta Airlines Inc. ( DAL). In fact, the combination would create an airline identical to the largest U.S. air carrier, UnitedContinental, in terms of revenue and traffic, and would be better than the second largest airline, Delta.

Further, the new carrier would leapfrog other airlines in the U.S. East Coast and Midwest. The potential combination would have lesser overlapping routes. The consolidation of American Airlines, if successful, would be the fourth in the last three years.

We see American Airlines-US Airways as the hottest pair in the industry as it will be in the best interest of the customers. Despite the long-standing problems with its pilot union, US Airways has been a profitable airline for the past several years, delivering best service to passengers with a top management team. On the other hand, American Airlines is a loss-making entity for several years due to its inefficient management team. In fact, it is the worst air carrier in the industry in terms of customer satisfaction.

Moreover, US Airways has been looking for a merger candidate following its bankruptcy protection filing in 2002. The company failed to acquire Delta, when it went bankrupt in 2006. As a result, US Airways will see American Airlines’ bankruptcy as a great opportunity to take over its larger rival.

We believe this is an opportune moment for American Airlines to consolidate in order to regain its lost profits and operational efficiency. As United and Delta will be long-term beneficiaries following the merger actions on both capacity and cost fronts, we believe American Airlines will also emerge as a successful candidate by balancing its debt level and lowering costs.

Nevertheless, any potential merger with AMR will take several months or a year to materialize, as American Airlines is yet to complete its court restructuring process and will undergo antitrust scrutiny.

Effective early this year, the shares of American Airlines were de-listed from the New York Stock Exchange. The company currently has a Zacks #3 (Hold) Rank for US Airways for the short term (1–3 months).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Despite all the teeth nashing and armchair experts out there, this merger is going to happen. Arpey's thesis of "you don't have to be the biggest" has been a failure. Jack Welch's idea that you have to be #1 or #2 has been proven right. AA stands no chance with organic growth in large markets with disgusted employees and the competitve response from other larger carriers.

If Tom Horton wins, he collects $50 million from an eventual IAG buyout after the Republicans change the foreign ownership rules within two years, and after he buys USAirways with investor money flocking to AA because his employees are locked into indertured servitude contracts for a decade to come.

If Tom Horton loses, he leaves AA without his chance at $50 million.

Follow the ball, no matter what, someone will be cheering at the end of the game. It's all about Horton's payoff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
This story assumes that no merger will take place before AA emerges from BK.
At this point, I think most of us are hoping the merger happens before we emerge from BK.




ZACHS Investment Report

The rumors about American Airlines, a subsidiary of AMR Corp., merging with another airline have been heating up since the company filed for bankruptcy protection in November last year. Finally, the market buzz appears to be coming true with the three labor unions of American Airlines supporting a plan for the bankrupt carrier’s merger with rival US Airways Group Inc. ( LCC), the fifth largest U.S. airline.

This move represents a first step toward a consolidation, though creditors, directors, and management are yet to give their green signal.

The three unions – Allied Pilots Association, Association of Professional Flight Attendants and Transport Workers Union – represent as many as 55,000 employees at American Airlines. According to them, the merger would save about 6,200 jobs as opposed to what AMR Corp. can as a standalone entity, and speed up the restructuring process.

We believe the potential American Airlines-US Airways merger could change the competitive dynamics of the airline industry. The combination would be strong enough in scope and size to compete with their larger rivals, United Continental Holdings Inc. ( UAL) and Delta Airlines Inc. ( DAL). In fact, the combination would create an airline identical to the largest U.S. air carrier, UnitedContinental, in terms of revenue and traffic, and would be better than the second largest airline, Delta.

Further, the new carrier would leapfrog other airlines in the U.S. East Coast and Midwest. The potential combination would have lesser overlapping routes. The consolidation of American Airlines, if successful, would be the fourth in the last three years.

We see American Airlines-US Airways as the hottest pair in the industry as it will be in the best interest of the customers. Despite the long-standing problems with its pilot union, US Airways has been a profitable airline for the past several years, delivering best service to passengers with a top management team. On the other hand, American Airlines is a loss-making entity for several years due to its inefficient management team. In fact, it is the worst air carrier in the industry in terms of customer satisfaction.

Moreover, US Airways has been looking for a merger candidate following its bankruptcy protection filing in 2002. The company failed to acquire Delta, when it went bankrupt in 2006. As a result, US Airways will see American Airlines’ bankruptcy as a great opportunity to take over its larger rival.

We believe this is an opportune moment for American Airlines to consolidate in order to regain its lost profits and operational efficiency. As United and Delta will be long-term beneficiaries following the merger actions on both capacity and cost fronts, we believe American Airlines will also emerge as a successful candidate by balancing its debt level and lowering costs.

Nevertheless, any potential merger with AMR will take several months or a year to materialize, as American Airlines is yet to complete its court restructuring process and will undergo antitrust scrutiny.

Effective early this year, the shares of American Airlines were de-listed from the New York Stock Exchange. The company currently has a Zacks #3 (Hold) Rank for US Airways for the short term (1–3 months).
[/quote]
 
Totally agree with you 85er. This all about the Benjamin's and how much of them Horton can hoard from all of us. If this merger happens now, Horton and all his cronies are gone with no golden parachute, as it should be. They took our money and wasted the opportunity to restructure out of BK, now THEY must pay with their jobs.
 
Totally agree with you 85er. This all about the Benjamin's and how much of them Horton can hoard from all of us. If this merger happens now, Horton and all his cronies are gone with no golden parachute, as it should be. They took our money and wasted the opportunity to restructure out of BK, now THEY must pay with their jobs.

As I posted on another thread, I think Horton and company's parachutes and bonusses are assured regardless of the outcome of the bankruptcy. The standard for their bonusses is that they dont quit and they don't die. So far, so good. :lol:
 
If USAir merged with AA before AA emerged from BK...wouldn't USAir assume all AA pre BK debt? It would be in Parkers best interest financially to wait until BK settles some of AA's debt?
 
There is no way world traveler will take this laying down!
He is grasping at anything he can. Keep an eye for him in DFW. He will be easy to spot in his Delta shirt and boxers..
That dude needs some help, and he doesnt work for an airline, so he says....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
As I posted on another thread, I think Horton and company's parachutes and bonusses are assured regardless of the outcome of the bankruptcy. The standard for their bonusses is that they dont quit and they don't die. So far, so good. :lol:

Agreed, they get their parachutes. They would be big money for you and me, but not for Horton who already has his cash from AT&T and the money he get would be like me and you getting a used Corrolla as a parting gift. At his point, he is hell bent on maintaining his CEO Captain bid position and the potential payoff that is well into another league. Ego might even be a bigger player in his case. When you finally make CEO and get canned in months, my guess is you're not considered in the CEO/former CEO club. Parker is no different.
 
At this point, I think most of us are hoping the merger happens before we emerge from BK.

I can almost guarantee that that won't happen. If a merger occurs it will be as part of the POR and consummated upon bankruptcy exit.

Jim
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I can almost guarantee that that won't happen. If a merger occurs it will be as part of the POR and consummated upon bankruptcy exit.

Jim

US Airways and America West have been through this before. The US Airways-AA merger will use the blue print of the US Airways-America West merger, which BoeingBoy described. The major reason it has to be part of the POR is so that Doug Parker can use the bankruptcy court to void any contract, lease, or other obligations he desires before AMR loses its abiliyt to shed costs with court assistance. This will make the combined business entity stronger post emergence.

I suspect Horton's objection to the merger is that he and his team will lose their "formal reorganization" bonus payments and he and his team will lose their jobs if the merger occurs upon bankruptcy exit. If the merger happens after bankruptcy exit AMR could remain in control of the combined carrier, Horton and his team could be the surviving management team, and the airline will be weaker with less cost cuts.

USA320Pilot
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I suspect Horton's objection to the merger is that he and his team will lose their "formal reorganization" bonus payments and he and his team will lose their jobs if the merger occurs upon bankruptcy exit. If the merger happens after bankruptcy exit AMR could remain in control of the combined carrier, Horton and his team could be the surviving management team, and the airline will be weaker with less cost cuts.
Are you saying that if Horton gets his way, and exits Ch 11 on his terms, and THEN merges with US, that the combined airline would be weaker "with less cost cuts" than if Parker is allowed to merge with AA as part of AA's plan of reorganization?

This rivals anything Lewis Carroll has written.

Parker has offered the AA labor unions contract changes that would not cut as deeply as Horton's changes. So how would AA achieve greater cost cuts under the Parker POR than under the Horton POR?
 
If the merger happens after bankruptcy exit AMR could remain in control of the combined carrier, Horton and his team could be the surviving management team, and the airline will be weaker with less cost cuts.
That's backwards. If AA gets the cuts it wants it would be lower cost post-bankruptcy than the merged carrier with the promises that Parker has made to get the Unions on board a merger.

Parkers plan - merge as part of the POR. Higher employee costs.

Horton's plan - exit as a stand-alone. Lower employee costs.

Jim
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
He is grasping at anything he can. Keep an eye for him in DFW. He will be easy to spot in his Delta shirt and boxers..
That dude needs some help, and he doesnt work for an airline, so he says....

The amazing thing about WT is since he is certainly in bed with Delta in some format and his ultimate despise of US Airways. Let's suppose what he is saying about a AA/US hookup offering no value is true, then why is he so adamant of not wanting it to happen?! From a business perspective you would want a merger like that to flop so a combined AA would be deeper in financial trouble and Delta to be better off. Like I say WT if AA/US merger is so bad you need to be a cheerleader for it, not a hater! It will only hurt AA more right?! Which since AA is a competitor it would help Delta! But I know deep down you know the truth about a AA/US combination in that's Deltas worst nightmare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Are you saying that if Horton gets his way, and exits Ch 11 on his terms, and THEN merges with US, that the combined airline would be weaker "with less cost cuts" than if Parker is allowed to merge with AA as part of AA's plan of reorganization?

This rivals anything Lewis Carroll has written.

Parker has offered the AA labor unions contract changes that would not cut as deeply as Horton's changes. So how would AA achieve greater cost cuts under the Parker POR than under the Horton POR?

Labor costs are only part of the equation. Yes under Parker's plan labor costs would be higher, but other fixed costs would come down. For example, US Airways has said a merger would reduce non union cost cuts by $500 million per year.

If US Airways' plan would generate $1.5 billion in additional revenue and cost cuts then what's Horton's objection to the proposed merger? Furthermore, why does Horton want greater cuts for AMR's employees than offered by US Airways to support a stand-alone plan?