What's new

More MEM cuts

let's just say, robbed, that something that should be fairly obvious to resolve is clouded by interests of money and power, not surprisingly the same issues that are involved with unions.
MEM is a smaller market than CVG or PIT. Always was.

It's obvious how the "brawl" will end so we can write an ending just like all of the others that have gone before.

DL has served MEM since the earliest days of its history and knows what kind of business demand is there. It is much less than other former hubs.
 
This thread will end like all other threads that WT throws his verbose wet blanket on...With him talking and declaring victory while standing in a big empty room.
 
help us connect that thought with the topic of MEM, Q.

MEM was a success or failure because of ______ which WT influenced.

There are more than enough indications of how to make the board better but there are some that refuse to do their part. That kind of dynamic isn't restricted to this board.
 
zoom.... zoom....

back at the ranch.... guess you haven't determined what other FA bases are open for transfers regardless of the MEM situation. Suppose the list is the same?
 
I'm an outsider, remember.

Remember also that DL is pulling one SEA and one SFO longhaul flight but adding three at SEA so the net gain in flying on the west coast is not appreciably larger. SEA is a much smaller operation than any of the hubs you noted.
 
Absent clear exercise language, anything goes. I get it. That said, given the large boost in flying ex- SEA, I'm surprised it's not an option.
 
Kev did nwa ever have a large hub or ops at sea compared to say mem or anther city
 
SEA was always a strong city for NW, with lots of service, TPAC flights, freighters, and a MTX hangar. We also have an F/A base there, and used to have a RES center as well.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top