
Travelpro72 said:Doesn't Usairways usually do any painting to an aircraft only when its due for maintenance. It took ages to get all aircraft painted in the current livery. Then it is not any more to paint in the new scheme than if you were painting it over in the old. That would seem logical to me. We hopefully will have a logical management so we shall see.
[post="268988"][/post]
Travelpro72 said:Doesn't Usairways usually do any painting to an aircraft only when its due for maintenance.
[post="268988"][/post]
CLT-Douglas said:How About these ideas to keep the US Airways theme but a lighter roof for warm conditions...
scheme 1
Scheme 1 on A330
Scheme 2
[post="268831"][/post]
cltbay1homie said:well you lost me on that one...how about we do it again? Please :down:
[post="268990"][/post]

Travelpro72 said:That's sort of what I said earlier but was told they didn't understand. ??? I thought it was something to that effect. Maintenance or scheduled painting. Speaking of painting, have anyone really looked at the paint jobs on our US's a/c lately. I know in bk things get tight but as a passenger I would think, "If the plane looks like that do they take care of the rest of it"?.... Maybe the new "appearance supervisors" LOL can get on a ladder and start painting away.
[post="269089"][/post]

also the hardest to see...the WWII NAVY planes used the same colors to help blend into the sea from above, and sky from below...not to mention their invisibility at night on the tarmac....notice BA has it right.avek00 said:Say what you will about Steve Wolf, but he gave US the best and most professional-looking livery in the sky, at least among USA carriers.
[post="269198"][/post]