What's new

No deal for maintance or stores

We miss the real updates we used to get from you Bob.

If you were AMFA you would have a group of observers to get the infomation from. Now your going to have to rely on the TWU without open negos to the membership, Hmmmm, will they tell you everything? You would know this if you had members at the table with open negos.
 
I was informed yesterday that the union passed 3% a year for a 3 year contract and the company just pushed their term sheet back.
 
If you were AMFA you would have a group of observers to get the infomation from. Now your going to have to rely on the TWU without open negos to the membership, Hmmmm, will they tell you everything? You would know this if you had members at the table with open negos.
The TWU minions on this board have been challenged many times to explain why secret negotiations are superior to open negotiations.
 
No where on twubkfacts.org mentions if an agreement was reached or not.

They just said they met for 2 days.
 
No where on twubkfacts.org mentions if an agreement was reached or not.

They just said they met for 2 days.

Without open negotiations, where the membership can bear witness to those that are being compensated by the membership the aura of a Secret Society prevails.

The investors should demand a ROI just like any other business provides or goes into bankruptcy.
 

Yes, this the efficient method I would take to prevent the TWU membership from gaining access to the information they are entitled to.

If the TWU was serious about communication with it's membership they would just use the dues collected for the Democrat political machine to fill the proper envelopes , but as I understand it, that is against the law.
 
Buck, you always like to talk about the unions giving democrats money and bring politics into something where politics has nothing to do with it. You know why unions don't contribute to republicans? Because republicans are looking to bust unions, which would make one wonder why you would support people out to destroy you? You love reagan, who was a union buster, yet you support AMFA. You truly are one confused individual.
 
Judge Peck (mediating the talks) ordered that the talks be confidential:

Yes he ordered the talks to be confidential.

Saying a deal was struck or no deal still keeps the talks confidential.

This makes me think they have a deal. And this is why the don't want to say one way or the other. They don't want to say they don't have a deal because they don't want to get caght lying. And they don't want to say they do have a deal because they are going to sign it at the last minute.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top