Well, it looks like I won't be at the top of this MCO-PHX flight:
It would have to be someone that is retired. I am not aware of anyone still working with 55 years of service. Not to mention that they would be 73 years old assuming they started when they were 18. As far as Fleet Service is concerned, I believe the most senior person has a 1965 DOH. I did work with a few guys at my former station that had 1956 to 1962 hire dates...
It would have to be someone that is retired. I am not aware of anyone still working with 55 years of service. Not to mention that they would be 73 years old assuming they started when they were 18. As far as Fleet Service is concerned, I believe the most senior person has a 1965 DOH. I did work with a few guys at my former station that had 1956 to 1962 hire dates...
It would have to be someone that is retired. I am not aware of anyone still working with 55 years of service. Not to mention that they would be 73 years old assuming they started when they were 18. As far as Fleet Service is concerned, I believe the most senior person has a 1965 DOH. I did work with a few guys at my former station that had 1956 to 1962 hire dates...
There is an F/A with over 50 years. Her picture rotates onthe HubWings.
But it's sad that a retiree had to burn an SA1 pass to avoid boarding behind a new hire.
I agree. I suppose this can be debated but I've always felt the retired should fly under their doh & not be kicked to sa4. Lord willing my turn will come soon.
But didn't the money they were making have more buying power?You have to remember that most retirees weren't making anywhere near that much before retirement and their pension was taken over by the PBGC, cutting what would have been a middle income living in retirement to qualifying for food stamps. Somehow, I and every other East employee got by boarding after retirees since long before AWA was around.
Personally, despite the changes, I still have a comfortable standard of living and don't have to work to make ends meet. But I expect that those like me will be the exception rather than the rule going forward. Although they won't be working for US after retirement, many retirees will be working somewhere and have the same time/schedule constraints as any new hire.
Jim
You have to remember that most retirees weren't making anywhere near that much before retirement and their pension was taken over by the PBGC, cutting what would have been a middle income living in retirement to qualifying for food stamps. Somehow, I and every other East employee got by boarding after retirees since long before AWA was around.
Personally, despite the changes, I still have a comfortable standard of living and don't have to work to make ends meet. But I expect that those like me will be the exception rather than the rule going forward. Although they won't be working for US after retirement, many retirees will be working somewhere and have the same time/schedule constraints as any new hire.
Jim
True for everyone over enough time - at least dollar for dollar. Count in concessions and loss of pension, and the decreasing buying power of each dollar is compounded - less dollars each worth less. Which is why most retirees, who made much less than 6 figures in the best of times, won't have the retirement income they envisioned having and will be working after retiring from US. How many, that had expected a livable retirement, will be getting $1000-$2000/month from the PBGC?But didn't the money they were making have more buying power?