Obamas redecorating the White House

FA Mikey

Veteran
Aug 19, 2002
4,421
301
miami
goldwatermiller08.com
Obama's not using taxpayer $$ to redecorate the White House



By Erica Orden

At a time when people are having trouble holding on to their houses, Barack and Michelle Obama have sensibly decided not to use taxpayers’ money to renovate theirs. New presidents are allotted $100,000 to overhaul the White House residence and the Oval Office, and the Obamas hired Hollywood decorator Michael S. Smith (known, per his site, for mixing “Old World classicism with very contemporary settingsâ€). But the First Couple isn’t spending that money. They “are not using public funds or accepting donations of goods for redecorating their private quarters,†says Camille Johnston, director of communications for the First Lady. Nor is the couple, who reported $4.2 million in household income in 2007 tax returns, using money from the White House Historical Association, a privately funded foundation that paid for a $74,000 set of china shortly before Laura Bush left town.



But does this mean they’re going to spend more than $100,000 or less? Though Michelle Obama has talked up Pottery Barn, Smith’s client list includes cost-is-no-object types like Rupert Murdoch, Steven Spielberg, and former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain—for whom he procured that $87,783 rug. “There’s no question that he’ll get it done in the way that it’s supposed to be done,†says Smith client and Democratic donor Katherine Chez. “But how, I don’t know.†The White House declined to disclose the budget, saying that all expenses would remain private as a result of the Obamas’ decision to absorb the cost.
 
Obama's not using taxpayer $$ to redecorate the White House



By Erica Orden

At a time when people are having trouble holding on to their houses, Barack and Michelle Obama have sensibly decided not to use taxpayers’ money to renovate theirs. New presidents are allotted $100,000 to overhaul the White House residence and the Oval Office, and the Obamas hired Hollywood decorator Michael S. Smith (known, per his site, for mixing “Old World classicism with very contemporary settingsâ€). But the First Couple isn’t spending that money. They “are not using public funds or accepting donations of goods for redecorating their private quarters,†says Camille Johnston, director of communications for the First Lady. Nor is the couple, who reported $4.2 million in household income in 2007 tax returns, using money from the White House Historical Association, a privately funded foundation that paid for a $74,000 set of china shortly before Laura Bush left town.



But does this mean they’re going to spend more than $100,000 or less? Though Michelle Obama has talked up Pottery Barn, Smith’s client list includes cost-is-no-object types like Rupert Murdoch, Steven Spielberg, and former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain—for whom he procured that $87,783 rug. “There’s no question that he’ll get it done in the way that it’s supposed to be done,†says Smith client and Democratic donor Katherine Chez. “But how, I don’t know.†The White House declined to disclose the budget, saying that all expenses would remain private as a result of the Obamas’ decision to absorb the cost.
How special......Isn't that a wonderfully refreshing sign.

PALEase!!!!

View attachment 8311
 
PALEase, is right. If they had used the 100,000 government money you would have had a field day about everyone tightening there belts and the plight of the average joe. If they had taken money from donors, same reply.
 
PALEase, is right. If they had used the 100,000 government money you would have had a field day about everyone tightening there belts and the plight of the average joe. If they had taken money from donors, same reply.

Yea, your probably right. :lol:

What you are seeing here is the good 'ole fashioned Chicago style/Demorat Poitical training he received in action.....at it's finest. She, er, He, is smooth, no doubt. I'll give him that much!

View attachment 8312
 
The White House declined to disclose the budget, saying that all expenses would remain private as a result of the Obamas’ decision to absorb the cost.

Seems like we have a right to know how they do it................

George Soros is probably paying for it....

You know....its probably not that big a deal...most likely costs less than those $100 a pound steaks they were serving on our dime recently.
 
Seems like we have a right to know how they do it................

George Soros is probably paying for it....

You know....its probably not that big a deal...most likely costs less than those $100 a pound steaks they were serving on our dime recently.
Definitely cost less than each of the record number of vacations taken to Crawford.
 

Latest posts