Neg...don't know that info myself.
I don't disregard your point as per working upwards on the blame ladder. We'll stay on opposite sides of the fence as regards the fix for such though. I just do not feel that said layers of inacessability to the membership should exist in any proper union. Such serves only to breed little nestings of permanent "politicians"/snakes who's only real goal is to slither their way "up", and increase the "power" and income base of Alpo, and thus make secure their own "phoney-baloney jobs". These people aren't "pilots" in any real sense anymore. How many MEC members, of whatever tribal persuasion, fly much at all?..outside of traveling first class to BS conferences and various harrumphing festivals. Do they fly the line at nat'l? isn't it just too cute to see that bloated leech Prater dressed up in his "airline captain" costume? It all sickens me.
Call your MEC office and ask them to email you a copy of the resolution pertaining to DOH and the merger committee. If you trust your reps, then ask them directly why they went in that direction.
And as for structure, I personally believe the system is sound. The biggest shortcoming is apathy and the lack of pro-activity on the part of the line pilot.
Your Rep is a part of the MEC when they are in session. It is your rep that carries your message to the entire AAA union where he interacts with the other reps doing the same thing. Debates ensue and resolutions are passed. The MEC officers are merely mouthpieces and administrators running the day-to-day operations of the entire AAA union.
Your MEC is a part of the BoD when it comes to National and sets its policy. It all starts with the line pilot working all the way down to Prater.
It is the line pilot that is responsible for watching his rep. If you don't like what he's doing, recall him.
And as an FYI, being a former officer, I've never travelled FC, attended conferences that were BS (very worthwhile), and avoid any "harrumphing festivals" as they tend to waster my time and keep me away from family and friends.
Not to say that there isn't any abuse because there is. But you get that in any structure and its eventually dealt with accordingly. National watches the bucks pretty well as does the government.
And most of the guys I've worked with within and across airlines are very hardworking and take this stuff personally.
So PHL wasn't leading where you want to go? That makes them bad leaders? But I thought you said that it takes leadership to lead to the best place even if people don't want to go there.
🙄
But now you want them to go were you want to so they can be good leaders.
Hmmm, kind of a dumb post, but I'll give it a shot.
Maintaining only one position with NO flexibility was a VERY bad place to be during merger negotiations. Nicolau thought so as did your MC who, by the way, asked your MEC to move away from it.
With no flexibility and an inability to negotiate, arbitration was the only option.
And here you are.