Jim, I thought I would let this one ride for a while and see how you responded. Typical ALPA “volunteer” bulls…t. You are full of it. You got FPL, and I won’t say you are quibbling, you are a liar if you say you did not.
you're as bad as BS. I said I got FPL, just not from ALPA. Admitted it up front. So who's full of bs?
Couple of anecdotes. One of my mentors and neighbors growing up in Atlanta ended up a senior check airman at EAL. Got cancer in his mid fifties and was for all intents cured. Crossed the picket line on the first day of the strike telling my family “the Company saved my life with excellent medical care.” Next, witnessing one of our long time committee chairs this Spring chewing on a pilot who dared question her work ethic, saying she was paid by the “Company” and not the line pilots. “ And then there is Maude”..that would be you.
You lost me there. What does an EA scab have to do with FPL?
ALPA and USAPA have zero differences in FPL payment. I have knowledge of both processes. You are dead wrong about bid closing being the only ones “not having to file.” There are many incidents where the Company, to its credit, picks up FPL.
And I covered that. Did I not say that the bid closing committee was the only committee where
100% of FPL was paid by the company? Did I not say that in certain circumstances other committee's members' FPL was paid by the company? Who's full of bs?
But that was always “Union” dues at work actually paying you..no difference.
Who's pocket FPL pay comes out of is a definite difference. You see, the company was happy to have the bid closing committee participate in the bid closings. Many decisions were made by the committee and having a union committee make those decisions meant no grievance could be filed against the company. FPL was a small price to pay for that.
You are not special. You worked for the pilots, not the Company.
I've never claimed to be special. I worked on behalf of the pilots but since they didn't pay me I didn't work
for them. The company paid me when FPL was warranted. Why is that so hard for you to understand when you cite other examples of the company paying FPL?
Any pay you relieved was a result of your Union and your contract.
Fine - cite where the contract or any side letter says that the union negotiated FPL for the bid closing committee. That committee represents one of those times when the company did the right thing, although for selfish motives.
You got FPL, and were not a true “volunteer.”
As I said, from the union perspective the bid closing committee is made up of volunteers - it didn't cost ALPA a dime in FPL. If you don't agree with that talk to ALPA, and apparently USAPA from what you said.
But don’t give me this crap about being different.
Since you didn't serve on the bid closing committee for ALPA and maybe not for USAPA, you making a lot of charges based on nothing but assumptions. I'm telling you that those assumptions are wrong when talking about the bid closing committee under ALPA. I served on that committee for 16 years and was told at the first closing after the US/PI merger that the company paid FPL, so I know how it worked both from the long-time chairman in 1990 and from 16 years of seeing how it worked. You are definitely wrong. Our FPL didn't come out of a negotiated pool of money provided by the company like you assume. It came strictly from the company, for selfish reasons as I said. If you want to be mad at someone, look toward the MEC members, for whom a MEC secretary filed FPL forms whether they missed trips due to union business or not. You and I were paying them FPL, often for nothing but showing up at a MEC meeting on their day off. It they happened to be on reserve, they got that FPL on top of guarantee, even if they flew only 20 hours that month. They, and the officers, were the ones lining their pockets at our expense. Myself, and the other members of the bid closing committee except the chairman (who was paid FPL by ALPA if he missed trips attending a MEC meeting to give a committee chairman's report to the MEC) , never cost the members a dime in FPL. So you can call someone who helps people without those getting the service paying for it a non-volunteer all you want, but it doesn't change the facts.
You apparently like anecdotes, so here's one. Prior to the financial troubles after 911, every member of the committee who didn't have other plans came to every bid closing - at times as many as 10 people. Reserves especially loved it since the company allowed then to claim trips that went junior whether they would have actually gotten them or not. After the financial difficulties started, the company unilaterally told the chairman that the expense of having every member there was too great and that they'd only pay FPL for the chairman and one member for each day the bid closing was anticipated to take - a two day bid closing would result in 3 people eligible for FPL out of the 8 or so on the committee at that time. No negotiating the change with the union, just a unilateral decision by the company. Was FPL coming out of a negotiated pool of money set aside for that purpose by the company? If so, why was a grievance not filed over the unilateral change? Simple - we weren't paid out of a negotiated FPL pool of money.
Jim