What's new

The Obama Presidency:

Wow, he wants everyone to get a shot at the jobs. You're right. That's a horrible idea. We have had gov sanction racism for over 200 years and you are just now getting upset about it?

No, they want to give jobs to minority women, with 9 kids, building bridges, who didn't want a job in the first place ! :blink:
I'm sure they'll be the model employee !

Agian , the 2 keys words in this entire topic are...................................................................
.........................................

Wealth Envy: People who are obsessed and jealous of the success others have attained through hard work and sacrifice !

Wealth Redistribution: Another socialized government progam, that steals money from successful,hard-working people and gives it to people, who did not earn it ! :shock:

You want to help the economy Nobama, give every "TAX PAYING" American a check for $50,000 , whether they're white, black, green or yellow !
Key words here being, "TAX PAYING" !
 
I had a good friend who lived in Canada who was sent home to die because she was too old and did not fit the scale for treatment. She went home that morning and died in her kitchen at lunchtime with a heart condition that could have been treated with surgery. "Free" health care is great if you fall in the range where treatment and life expectancy are at a good ratio.

I read one of the Obama options for 'universal' health care was rationing services ...and part of this rationing will be denial of service due to age and condition...even going as far as preventing paying out of your own pocket.

That was the way Hillary was going at it.

This will be a very sad state of affairs if it comes to be.....but then ,how else will one control the growing aging boomer's?
 
Southwind,

The words I see as crucial are "not simply go". As in no go to just one primary group. As in give everyone a shot.

777,

We can play the coulda woulda shoulda game all day. Hard to tell what would have happened. Going back to the cold war. Part of the agreement I believe was that Germany not spend all that much on Def as we just gout out a second war with them. Same with Japan. As for a carrier fleet. Had we all been developing alternate fuels that carrier fleet would not have been needed, at least not for protecting the oil supply.

I do not know how the Germans would have fared, probably not as well as they have. I have always know the Germans to be very frugal. After they bombings, the people would be out by the bombed structures, sorting through the rubble brick by brick and stacking them and cleaning them to rebuild. I have a friend whos parents are survivors. They save everything. Twist ties, plastic bags, no food is thrown out.... etc It's a very different culture than that of the US. Better in some, worse in others. In so fa as survival I believe they are better at it than the US. They have endured more and understand it better, or at least previous generations had. Not sure about the current German generations.

Dell,

Do you have a link for that health proposal? I don't think there is a snow balls chance in hell of something like that gaining any traction at least not the pay part.

Theoretically, I can see denying a smoker a lung transplant and giving it to a non-smoker. Smoking for me is the easiest due to the fact that there are no health levels of smoking. Too me it's a simpler good/bad equation. Eating and drinking involves far more levels of gray. I guess we can start a new thread on this if we want to continue but suffice to say that some folks may not be deserving of medical care if they ruin their lives of their own free will. In reality I do not think there is any impartial way of deciding that and the people in general would never tolerate it so I don't think it will come to pass unless times are very drastic.
 
777,

We can play the coulda woulda shoulda game all day. Hard to tell what would have happened. Going back to the cold war. Part of the agreement I believe was that Germany not spend all that much on Def as we just gout out a second war with them. Same with Japan. As for a carrier fleet. Had we all been developing alternate fuels that carrier fleet would not have been needed, at least not for protecting the oil supply.

I do not know how the Germans would have fared, probably not as well as they have. I have always know the Germans to be very frugal. After they bombings, the people would be out by the bombed structures, sorting through the rubble brick by brick and stacking them and cleaning them to rebuild. I have a friend whos parents are survivors. They save everything. Twist ties, plastic bags, no food is thrown out.... etc It's a very different culture than that of the US. Better in some, worse in others. In so fa as survival I believe they are better at it than the US. They have endured more and understand it better, or at least previous generations had. Not sure about the current German generations.

I'm not playing "coulda woulda shoulda". I'm just pointing out the fact that Germany got a preety good return from the US tax payer footing most of the bill for the defense of Western Europe during the Cold War. If Germany have had to pay for it they would not have the gernerous social porgrams that they do.
 
Had everything stayed the same you are probably right but there is no way of telling if that would have been the case. If they had to spend more on their own defense, that may have resulted in other discoveries (as a result of need) that decreased cost elsewhere or they could have gone belly up. No way to really know. That's what I meant by the 'wouolda coulda shoulda comment.

Had I washed my car my self instead of taking to a car wash I would not have been rear ended but who knows what else would/would not have happened.
 
I, like many Americans, are praying for the best and preparing for the worst. That's all you can do in times like these.

At the very least, I'm glad we have a President whose exceptional communication skills are exceptionally good as opposed to exceptionally poor.

You can be on one side or the other, but if you're communicating your message to me and have the ability to at least appear to be intelligent, you're going to get farther than if you have difficulty putting words together to form sentences.

Obama's oratory skills meet or exceed Ronald Reagan, at least in my opinion.
 
I, like many Americans, are praying for the best and preparing for the worst. That's all you can do in times like these.

At the very least, I'm glad we have a President whose exceptional communication skills are exceptionally good as opposed to exceptionally poor.

You can be on one side or the other, but if you're communicating your message to me and have the ability to at least appear to be intelligent, you're going to get farther than if you have difficulty putting words together to form sentences.

Obama's oratory skills meet or exceed Ronald Reagan, at least in my opinion.

Oratory skills shouldn't be confused with experience as to which Obama is severely lacking. Sometimes those "oratory skills" can also make one sound a little "slick".
 
Oratory skills shouldn't be confused with experience as to which Obama is severely lacking. Sometimes those "oratory skills" can also make one sound a little "slick".

hmmm i haven't gotten that sense from listening to him speak ... but then again too many americans watch MTV these days so they might not be able to pay attention when someone speaks without a commerical break for more than 5 minutes .


as to his experince , he seems to be doing as well or better than i think most people would given the situation ... how many times have i heard XYZ quoted figure say "wow in all my XYZ years in XYZ industry i''ve NEVER seen anything like this before "
 
This is a little off the subject but did anyone notice that there is money in the bailout bill to build an icebreaker? With global warming and the melting of polar ice, what's the point?
 
This is a little off the subject but did anyone notice that there is money in the bailout bill to build an icebreaker? With global warming and the melting of polar ice, what's the point?

Obama uses it when he meets with the GOP...... :lol:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top